Communications
the use of common glass reactors. Concerning the selectivity,
no trace of di- or triarylamines—by-products frequently
formed with palladium catalysis—was observed.
to establish a protocol that permitted the amination of 4-
bromobiphenyl with ammonia in excellent yield. Of the
solvents, bases, additives, and copper sources tested (Table 2),
DMF, caesium carbonate, [Cu(acac)2] (10%), and ligand 1
(0.4 equiv) were found to be the best combination (93% yield
of 4-aminobiphenyl; Table 2, entry 18). It is noteworthy that
the key factor for the success of our system is its biphasic
character.[17] On heating, two phases are present and this
seems necessary, as attested to by the absence of reactivity in
either neat water (Table 2, entry 14) or neat DMF saturated
with NH3 (Table 2, entry 15). We can reasonably assume that
the reaction takes place in the organic phase and that the
aqueous phase plays the role of a reservoir for NH3 (which is
only sparingly soluble in DMF) and copper complexes such as
[Cu(NH3)4]2+. These observations are very preliminary, but
work is currently in progress to better understand how this
biphasic catalytic system functions.
Next we explored the scope of this new method. Our
catalytic system efficiently promotes cross-coupling reactions
between aqueous ammonia and aryl iodides with either
electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituents
(Table 3, entries 1–4) at 908C. The reaction is even possible
at lower temperatures (608C) with activated substrates such
as p-iodocyanobenzene (Table 3, entry 3).[18] A poor yield is
obtained with 2-iodobenzoic ester because of partial hydrol-
ysis of the ester group (Table 3, entry 5). Furthermore, the
yield of the aniline derivative from the highly activated 4-
nitroiodobenzene (63%; Table 3, entry 4) was slightly low-
ered because of disubstitution at the nitrogen atom.
À
However, small amounts of the C C coupling
product (ca. 5%), resulting from arylation of the
diketone, was detected (see above structure).
We then tested other diketone ligands, and
observed that 1 gives yields almost as high as the
electron-rich, but more expensive 2,2,6,6-tetra-
methyl-3,5-heptanedione (6). All other ligands tested
(Table 1, entries 2–5, 7, and 8) gave only poor yields. The
relationship between the structure of the ligand and reactivity
is still not clear. We presume that there is a compromise
between the solubility of the ligand in the water phase and its
electron-donating ability, which may explain the similar yields
observed in the presence of ligands 1 and 6 (the former is
more soluble in water but less electron-donating than the
latter). We presume that the low reactivity observed with
ligands 3 and 5 results from the presence of a substituent in
the middle position of the diketone. Several copper sources
were screened using the same model substrate and supporting
ligand 1.[16] The presence of copper, ligand, and base are all
necessary in this protocol (Table 2, entries 1–3). Different
forms of Cu (oxidation state 0, I, or II) gave quite similar
results (63 to 79% yield of product) in the presence of
0.6 equivalents of 1 (Table 2, entries 4–8), or with 0.4 equiv-
alents of 1 in the case of [Cu(acac)2] (Table 2, entry 10). By a
systematic variation of the reaction parameters we were able
Although the aryl iodides are interesting substrates, we
focused our attention on arylation with aryl bromides, which
are less reactive electrophiles but of much greater interest for
industrial applications. Our procedure is in this case also
compatible with a wide range of substituents. Various aniline
derivatives were obtained with both unreactive and reactive
aryl bromides including PhBr, bromonaphthyl, 3-bromoani-
sole, 4-bromotoluene, 4-bromobiphenyl, 4-bromocyanoben-
zene, and 4-acetobromobenzene. In most cases, good to
excellent yields of the isolated products were obtained when
the reactions were carried out at 908C and, as in the case of
the corresponding iodides, excellent yields were obtained
even at 608C with activated aryl bromides (Table 3, entries 11
and 12). The reaction with the electron-rich 4-bromotoluene
was slower, but the product could be isolated in good yield by
extending the reaction time to 36 h (Table 3, entry 9). In the
case of 1,4-dibromobenzene, 4-bromoaniline was isolated in
only 41% yield because of the formation of disubstituted
product (Table 3, entry 13). We were successful in extending
the procedure to include heterocyclic aromatic bromides (2-
or 3-bromopyridines; Table 3, entries 14 and 15), which are
important pharmaceutical intermediates.[19]
Table 2: Amination of 4-bromobiphenyl using various copper sources
(0.1 equiv) in the presence of supporting ligand 2,4-pentadione (1).[a]
[Cu]
Ligand 1 (equiv)
Solvent
Yield [%][a]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
–
CuI
CuI
CuI
Cu
CuO
Cu(OAc)2
Cu2O
[Cu(acac)2]
[Cu(acac)2]
[Cu(acac)2]
[Cu(acac)2]
[Cu(acac)2]
[Cu(acac)2]
[Cu(acac)2]
[Cu(acac)2]
[Cu(acac)2]
[Cu(acac)2]
0.6
–
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMSO
CH3CN
NMP
H2O
0
0[b]
2[c]
76
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
–
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
68
79
73
63
23
76
18
34
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
50
0
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
6[d]
45[e]
45[f]
93,[g] 20[h]
In conclusion, we have discovered a general, practical,
economical, and efficient method for transforming aryl
iodides and bromides into aniline derivatives in one step.
This biphasic catalytic procedure is unusual, and work is
currently in progress to elucidate exactly how it functions. The
very low operational pressure allows this reaction to be
performed without autoclaves, which are required for work-
ing with liquid ammonia, and this should be an enormous
[a] GC yield determined using 1,3-dimethoxybenzene as an internal
standard. [b] Same result at 1408C. [c] Without base. [d] DMF presatu-
rated with gaseous ammonia. [e] Addition of 0.5 equiv NBu4Br. [f] K2CO3
was used instead of Cs2CO3. [g] Reaction time 24 h. [h] Reaction time
24 h, 3% of [Cu(acac)2]was used. acac=acetylacetanoate.
338
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 337 –339