642 Biomacromolecules, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2010
Gelbrich et al.
(10) Sun, Y.; Ding, X.; Zheng, Z.; Cheng, X.; Hu, X.; Peng, Y. Chem.
Commun. 2006, 2765–2767.
(11) Ohnishi, N.; Furukawa, H.; Hideyuki, H.; Wang, J.-M.; An, C.-I.;
Fukusaki, E.; Kataoka, K.; Ueno, K.; Kondo, A. BioNanotechnology
2006, 2, 43–49.
brush-coated magnetic particles are obtained that possess a high
number of accessible carboxy-analogue functional groups that
can be further modified with bioactive species with the purpose
of their manipulation or isolation. Here, we have shown that
functional group densities of up to 30 mmol per gram of
magnetite could be achieved that are accessible by small
molecule substrates.
The particles are easily dispersed in aqueous media up to 23
mg/mL magnetite. The thermoreversible solvation of the shell
is responsible for thermoflocculation, that results in a fast and
highly effective magnetic isolation of the hybrid structures above
the transition temperature.
As a result of the high functional group density, the particles
show superior behavior in in vitro biocatalysis and labeling
experiments. By immobilization of trypsin to the polymeric shell
of the obtained nanoparticles, magnetically supported biocata-
lysts are obtained. Kinetic experiments on the catalytic activity
via the trypsin mediated scission reaction of BAPNA reveal no
loss in specific enzyme activity when compared to soluble
trypsin. In addition, we have demonstrated the nanostructures’
potential for selective tagging and separation of the exposed
surface of endothelial cells in order to facilitate the isolation
and identification of membrane proteins. While unspecific
adsorption of nonfunctional particles was not observed, in vitro
experiments involving active ester group bearing core-shell
particles resulted in a dense population of particles at the
exposed cell membrane, attributed to the formation of covalent
(amide) bonds.
(13) Perruchot, C.; Khan, M. A.; Kamitsi, A.; Armes, S. P.; von Werne,
T.; Patten, T. E. Langmuir 2001, 17, 4479–4481.
(14) Chen, X. Y.; Randall, D. P.; Perruchot, C.; Watts, J. F.; Patten, T. E.;
von Werne, T.; Armes, S. P. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 257, 56–
64.
(15) Li, D.; Sheng, X.; Zhao, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6248–6256.
(16) Li, D.; Jones, G. L.; Dunlap, J. R.; Hua, F.; Zhao, B. Langmuir 2006,
22, 3344–3351.
(17) Schmidt, A. M. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2005, 26, 93–97.
(18) Gelbrich, T.; Feyen, M.; Schmidt, A. M. Macromolecules 2006, 39,
3469–3472.
(19) Kaiser, A.; Gelbrich, T.; Schmidt, A. M. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
2006, 18, 2563–2580.
(20) Wang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Guan, W.; Ding, B. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254,
5170–5174.
(21) Gou, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, W.; Huang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Wan, M.; Bai, F.
Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 4542–4544.
(22) Chanana, M.; Jahn, S.; Georgieva, R.; Lutz, J.-F.; Ba¨umler, H.; Wang,
D. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 1906–1914.
(23) Lutz, J.-F.; Stiller, S.; Hoth, A.; Kaufner, L.; Pison, U.; Cartier, R.
Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 3132–3138.
(24) Murata, H.; Prucker, O.; Ru¨he, J. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 5497–
5503.
(25) Cullen, S. P.; Mandel, I. C.; Gopalan, P. Langmuir 2008, 24, 13701–
13709.
(26) Batz, H.-G.; Franzmann, G.; Ringsdorf, H. Angew. Chem. 1972, 24,
1189–1190.
(27) Massart, R.; Cabuil, V. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 84, 967–973.
(28) Schimmel, G., Vogell, W., Eds. Methodensammlung der Elektronen-
mikroskopie; Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH: Stuttgart,
1983.
(29) Kaiser, A.; Schmidt, A. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 1894–1998.
(30) Gelbrich, T.; Feyen, M.; Schmidt, A. M. Z. Phys. Chem. 2006, 220,
41–49.
(31) Frickel, N.; Messing, R.; Gelbrich, T.; Schmidt, A. M. Langmuir 2009,
DOI: 10.1021/la902904f.
(32) Matyjaszewski, K.; Davis, T. P. Handbook of Radical Polymerization;
WileyIntersience: New York, 2002.
(33) Rathforn, J. M.; Tew, G. N. Polymer 2008, 49, 1761–1769.
(34) Shunmugam, R.; Tew, G. N. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem.
2005, 43, 5831–5843.
(35) Monge, S.; Haddelton, D. M. Eur. Polym. J. 2004, 40, 37–45.
(36) Odenbach, S. MagnetoViscous Effects in Ferrofluids; Springer-Verlag,
2002.
(37) Jones, A. M.; Glinel, K.; Oren, R.; Nysten, B.; Huck, W. T. S.
Macromolecules 2007, 40, 4403–4405.
The principle described here is applicable to the modification
with other biologically or catalytically relevant groups and will
therefore open new ways for the design of multifunctional hybrid
nanostructures with different property portfolios.
Acknowledgment. We thank Prof. H. Ritter for his steady
interest in our studies. Thanks to Dr. B. Emde for her support
with biological and technical questions. We thank Dr. Yan Lu
University of Bayreuth (Germany) for TEM images of the
particles. We gratefully acknowledge DFG for financial support
within the Emmy-Noether Program and the Priority Program
SPP 1259.
Supporting Information Available. Synthesis and properties
of P(OEGMA-co-SIMA) model copolymers, zeta potential
measurements, and TEM of cell labeling control experiment.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
(38) Lutz, J.-F.; Hoth, A. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 893–896.
(39) Sarin, K. V.; Kent, S. B. H.; Tam, J. P.; Merrifield, R. B. Anal.
Biochem. 1981, 117, 147–157.
(40) McCaldin, D. J. Chem. ReV. 1960, 60, 39–51.
com, BioMag, f ) 0.24 mol · g-1; www.chemagen.de, M-PVA
Magnetic beads activated AK11, f ) 0.39 mmol ·g-1; www.invitrogen.
References and Notes
(1) Hora´k, D.; Babie`, M.; Mackova´, H.; Benesˇ, M. J. J. Sep. Sci. 2007,
30, 1751–1772.
(2) Gu, H.; Xu, K.; Xu, C.; Xu, B. Chem. Commun. 2006, 941–949.
(3) Franzrep, M.; Siemann-Herzberg, M.; Hobley, T. J.; Thomas, O. R. T.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 70, 505–516.
(4) Safarik, I.; Safarikova, M. BioMagn. Res. Technol. 2004, 2, 1–17.
(5) Pankhurst, Q. A.; Connolly, J.; Jones, S. K.; Dobson, J. J. Phys. D:
Appl. Phys. 2003, 36, R167–R181.
(6) Safarik, I.; Safarikova, M. J. Chromatogr., B 1999, 722, 33–53.
(7) Yalcy´n, A.; Damin, F.; Ozkumur, E.; di Carlo, G.; Goldberg, B. B.;
Chiari, M.; Unlu, M. S. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 625–630.
(8) Kondo, A.; Kamura, H.; Higashitani, K. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
1994, 44, 99–105.
com, Dynabeads MyOne, f ) 0.4-0.8 mmol ·g-1
.
binding capacity, 8-20 mg ·g-1; www.micromod.de, nanomag-D
(streptavidin) streptavidin functionality, 1.5-2.0 mg ·g-1
.
(43) Erlanger, B. F.; Kokowsky, N.; Cohen, W. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
1961, 95, 271–278.
(44) Michaelis, L.; Menten, M. L. Biochem. Z. 1913, 49, 333–369.
(45) Lineweaver, H.; Burk, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1934, 56, 658–666.
(46) Hofstee, B. H. J. Nature 1959, 184, 1296–1298.
(47) Hofstee, B. H. J. Science 1952, 116, 329–331.
(48) Eadie, G. S. J. Biol. Chem. 1942, 146, 85–93.
(9) Lai, J. J.; Hoffman, J. M.; Ebara, M.; Hoffman, A. S.; Estourne‘s, C.;
Wattiaux, A.; Stayton, P. S. Langmuir 2007, 23, 7385–7391.
BM901203Z