Chemistry and Hydrolysis of Phosphorothioates
A R T I C L E S
reduction in 18Oδ - 16Oδ from 0.066 ppm in the dianion to
0.054 ppm in the monoanion.
It is uncertain why protonation of pNPPT causes the 31P
chemical shift to move downfield, in contrast to the movement
upfield observed with phosphates. Calculations have been re-
ported of the comparative Mulliken atomic charges on phosphate
and thiophosphate in all four possible protonation states (from
the trianion to the neutral species).26 In these calculations the
charge on phosphorus is more altered in phosphate than in
thiophosphate by protonation; in phosphate, from the trianion
PO43- to the neutral species H3PO4 the Mulliken atomic charge
on phosphorus changed in the sequence 1.23, 1.30, 1.38, to 1.56.
The calculated changes in thiophosphate were in the same
direction, but smaller: 1.28, 1.29, 1.31, to 1.44.26 Another study
using different computational methods found that the conjugate
bases of phosphoric acid and thiophosphoric acid respond
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the transition-state structure for the
hydrolysis of pNPPT dianion. P-O bond fission is extensive, and nearly a
full negative charge resides on the leaving group.
Inconsistencies in the synchronization of development of
charge and its delocalization by resonance have been well-
documented.32 Nitro compounds are particularly susceptible to
this phenomenon, and such transition-state imbalances in the
deprotonation of nitroalkanes (termed the “nitroalkane anomaly”)
have been central to the development of the principle of
nonperfect synchronization.32 One example is the deprotonation
of arylnitroalkanes (ArCH2NO2) by hydroxide ion in water. The
Hammett F value for the deprotonation rate is 1.28, while F for
the equilibrium is 0.83.33 This is unusual in that the rate of
deprotonation is more sensitive to substituent effects than the
equilibrium, implying that in the transition state more charge
is felt by the aryl group than in the fully deprotonated ion. The
most widely accepted explanation is that the transition state is
imbalanced in that delocalization of the negative charge into
the nitro group lags considerably behind deprotonation and
charge development.
Why there should be a difference in the synchronization of
charge development and delocalization between the reaction of
the phosphorothioate compared with the phosphate ester is
uncertain. This may arise from a difference in the electrostatic
description of the phosphoryl group compared with thiophos-
phoryl. In both transition states the leaving group resembles
p-nitrophenolate ion and is in proximity to the negatively
charged (thio)phosphoryl group. The extent to which charge is
delocalized, and presumably the synchronization with P-O bond
fission, may be influenced by electrostatic interactions between
these moieties.
-
oppositely to protonation.28 Protonation of H2PO4 caused the
computed gross atomic charge on phosphorus to change from
1.42 to 1.48, while protonation of H2PO3S- caused a change
from 1.01 to 0.85.28 Perhaps further computational study will
reveal which of these tendencies is correct and shed more light
on the reason for our NMR results.
Equilibrium Isotope Effect for Complexation of pNPPT.
In complexes with phosphorothioates, cadmium coordinates
virtually completely with sulfur. In zinc complexes with
phosphorothioates, about three-fourths of the species in solution
are sulfur coordinated, with the remainder coordinated to
oxygen.29 The lack of a significant change in 18Oδ - 16Oδ even
at the highest Zn2+ concentration indicates there is no significant
isotope effect. For Cd2+ the results were similar, indicating the
EIE is negligible (unity within experimental error). For com-
parison, the reported EIE for Ca2+ complexation with pNPP is
also near unity, 18K ) 0.997.30 The results indicate that
complexation in aqueous solution with either zinc or cadmium
does not result in significant changes in bonding within the
phosphoryl group. Cobalt(III) complexes with phosphate esters
have been found to result in significant EIEs,31 not unexpected
in light of the stronger coordinating properties of this metal ion.
Kinetic Isotope Effects. (A) Hydrolysis of the pNPPT
Dianion. The kinetic isotope effects in the leaving group in the
reaction of the dianion of pNPPT are indicative of significant
P-O bond fission and nearly a full negative charge on the
leaving group in the transition state. These KIEs were measured
at 50 °C in contrast to 95 °C for the pNPP data. Higher
Nonetheless, the18kbridge and 15k data together suggest that a
similar and substantial negative charge is delocalized in the
leaving groups of both reactions, even though P-O bond fission
is slightly greater in the reaction of pNPPT. Stereochemical
results and other data indicate that reactions of phosphorothioate
dianions such as pNPPT are stepwise DN + AN mechanisms in
which a thiometaphosphate intermediate forms,34 while phos-
phate esters react by concerted mechanisms.35 The loose
transition state implied by the isotope effects is shown schemati-
cally in Figure 6.
temperature reduces the magnitudes of KIEs, and the difference
18
in the magnitudes of
k
in the reactions of pNPP and
bridge
pNPPT is partly due to this effect, but this temperature difference
should only account for a small change (compare the 18knonbridge
The 18knonbridge data reported here for phosphorothioate esters
differ from previous data for phosphate esters in two respects.
values for the pNPP monoanion at 95 and at 30 °C in Table 3).
18
The value for
k
is normal, not inverse, for the loose
nonbridge
18
The larger value for
k
in the pNPPT dianion reaction
bridge
transition state of the pNPPT reaction, and it changes toward
the inverse direction as the transition state becomes tighter in
the diester reaction. This trend is logical if bending modes are
compared to the pNPP reaction implies the former reaction has
a larger degree of P-O bond fission in the transition state.
Evidently this occurs without a significant difference in the
amount of charge delocalization into the nitro group in the
transition states of the two reactions, as the values of 15k are
the same.
(31) Rawlings, J.; Hengge, A. C.; Cleland, W. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 542-549.
(32) Bernasconi, C. F. AdV. Phys. Org. Chem. 1992, 27, 119-238.
(33) Bordwell, F. G.; W. J. Boyle, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 3907-3911.
(34) Cullis, P. M.; Misra, R.; Wilkins, D. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1987, 1594-1596. Cullis, P. M.; Iagrossi, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 7870-7871. Burgess, J.; Blundell, N.; Cullis, P. M.; Hubbard, C. D.;
Misra, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7900-7901.
(28) Basch, H.; Krauss, M.; Stevens, W. J. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 1991,
235, 277-291.
(29) Sigel, R. K. O.; Song, B.; Sigel, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 744-
755.
(35) Herschlag, D.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 7579-7586.
Buchwald, S. L.; Friedman, J. M.; Knowles, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984,
106, 4911-4916.
(30) Hoff, R. H.; Mertz, P.; Rusnak, F.; Hengge, A. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 6382-6390.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 25, 2003 7551