acetate while the La3+ and Zn2+ catalysts refer to the methanol-
ysis of ethyl acetate). A second point of note is that the La3+
and Zn2+ catalysts have second order rate constants comparable
to the rate constant of methoxide attack in methanol, while the
Cu2+ : DMP and 3 : Zn2+(−OH) systems are at least 100-fold
(and several thousand-fold in the case of methanolysis of p-
nitrophenyl acetate) less reactive than methoxide or hydroxide
respectively for a given ester. Interestingly, where a comparison
can be made between the second order rate constants for
hydrolysis and methanolysis promoted by 3 : Zn2+(−OH) or
3 : Zn2+(−OCH3) respectively, the methanolysis reactions are
about 1000-fold faster than the hydrolysis reactions with the aryl
esters, and somewhat less for the aliphatic esters, again bearing
in mind that the hydrolysis data are with methyl acetate and the
methanolysis is with ethyl acetate.
4 G. W. Parshall and S. D. Ittel, Homogeneous Catalysis. The Ap-
plications and Chemistry of Catalysis by Soluble Transition Metal
Complexes, 2nd edn., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992, pp. 269–
296.
5 (a) A. A. Neverov, T. McDonald, G. Gibson and R. S. Brown,
Can. J. Chem., 2001, 79, 1704; (b) A. A. Neverov, G. Gibson and
R. S. Brown, Inorg. Chem., 2003, 42, 228.
6 For the designation of pH in non-aqueous solvents we use the recom-
mendations of the IUPAC Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature.
Definitive Rules 1997, 3rd edn., Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1998. If one
calibrates the measuring electrode with aqueous buffers and then
measures the pH of an aqueous buffer solution, the term wwpH is
used; if the electrode is calibrated in water and the ‘pH’ of the neat
buffered methanol solution then measured, the term swpH is used,
and if the electrode is calibrated in the same solvent and the ‘pH’
reading is made, then the term sspH is used.
7 W. Desloges, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, Inorg. Chem., 2004,
43, 6752.
8 A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2004, 2, 2245.
9 R. Cacciapaglia, S. Di Stephano, F. Fahrenkrug, U. Lu¨ning and L.
Mandolini, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 2004, 17, 350.
10 (a) S. Kitagawa, M. Munakata and A. Higashie, Inorg. Chim. Acta,
1884, 84, 79; (b) A. Paulovicova, U. El-Ayanan and Y. Fukuda, Inorg.
Chim. Acta, 2001, 321, 56; (c) electrospray MS measurements on
methanolic solutions containing equimolar amounts of CuCl2 and
dimethylphenanthroline (DMP) indicate the presence of monovalent
copper as Cu+ : DMP whereas the electrospray MS of CuCl2 in
the presence of the less sterically encumbered phenanthroline parent
shows only divalent copper complexes, consistent with the well-
known destabilizing effects of DMP on square planar, square pyra-
The fact that La3+ and Zn2+ systems react with many of
the esters faster than does methoxide gives some clue to the
mechanism of reaction. The available data are consistent with a
mechanism of catalysis that involves a pre-equilibrium binding
of the metal-methoxide complex with the ester followed by an
internal delivery of the methoxide via a five-coordinate transition
state to form an anionic tetrahedral addition intermediate
stabilized by a four coordinate Zn2+. This is analogous to
the general mechanism that is widely proposed for metal-ion
catalyzed hydrolyses, but is kinetically equivalent to a process
where an external nucleophilic hydroxide or methoxide attacks
the Mx+-coordinated ester.32 It is particularly interesting that,
where direct comparison can be made with the 3 : Zn2+(−OH)
system in promoting the hydrolysis of these esters in water, the
corresponding methanolysis promoted by 3 : Zn2+(−OCH3) is at
least two to three orders of magnitude larger. The likely origins of
the rate enhancements are an increased pre-equilibrium binding
midal and octahedral coordinate complexes and a stabilizing effect
10a,b
on tetrahedral or pseudo tetrahedral coordination geometries
.
11 The corresponding 3 : Zn2+ −OH species, which was first reported
:
as a model for carbonic anhydrase,13 has been investigated as to its
ability to catalyze the hydrolysis of aryl esters; J. Suh, S. J. Son and
M. P. Suh, Inorg. Chem., 1998, 37, 4872.
12 R. A. Joshi, M. K. Gurjar, N. K. Tripathy and M. S. Chorghade,
Org. Process Res. Dev., 2001, 5, 176.
13 E. Kimura, T. Shiota, T. Kooike, M. M. Shiro and M. Kodama,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 5805 report that the pKa for the aquo
form of 4 : Zn2+(H2O) is 8.4.
of the substrate, and a less solvated nucleophile attacking the
2+
=
Zn -coordinated C O unit.
14 F. Rived, M. Rose´s and E. Bosch, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1998, 374,
309.
15 (a) V. A. Palm, Tables of Rate and Equilibrium Constants of Hetero-
cyclic Reactions, Vol. 1 (1), Proizbodstvenno-Izdatelckii Kombinat
Biniti, Moscow, 1975; (b) V. A. Palm, Tables of Rate and Equilibrium
Constants of Heterocyclic Reactions, Suppl. Vol. 1, issue 3, Tartuskii
gosudarsvennii Universitet, Tartu, 1985.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance
of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of
Canada, Queen’s University and the United States Department
of the Army, Army Research Office, Grant No. W911NF-04-1-
0057.33 N. E. S. thanks NSERC for the award of a Summer
Student Research Award. Finally, the authors thank Prof.
Andrew Williams and Prof. Elisabeth Bosch for very helpful
discussions concerning various aspects of this work.
16 E. Bosch, F. Rived, M. Rose´s and J. Sales, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2, 1999, 1953.
17 J. Lu, Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario:
London, Ontario, Canada, 1994, p. 228.
18 B. Blesniewski, Z. Przybyszewski and Z. Paulak, J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 1, 1984, 80, 1769.
19 J. F. Kirsch and W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86, 837.
20 (a) G. T. T. Gibson, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, Can. J. Chem.,
2003, 81, 495; (b) J. S. Tsang, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 7602; (c) J. S. W. Tsang, A. A. Neverov and
R. S. Brown, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2004, DOI: 10.1039/b412132e;
(d) we have determined that the maximal activity for the La3+
catalyzed methanolysis of esters and phosphates lies in the sspH
region between 8.7–9.1, where 95% of the activity is attributed to
La3+2(−OCH3)2. Thus, the conditional observed k2La(OCH3) rate
constant reported in Table 1 is ∼1/2 of the k2 of the La3+2(−OCH3)2
active form.
21 The rationale for this is presented in ref. 8 above, and references 3
and 4 of that publication.
22 (a) Z. S. Chaw, A. Fischer and D. A. R. Happer, J. Chem. Soc. (B),
1971, 1818; (b) J. Kirsch, A. Clewell and A. Simon, J. Org. Chem.,
1968, 33, 127; (c) A. A. Humffray and J. J. Ryan, J. Chem. Soc. (B),
1967, 468.
Notes and references
1 (a) J. Koskikallio, in The Chemistry of Carboxylic Acids and Esters,
ed. S. Patai, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1969, pp. 103–136;
(b) M. A. Ogliaruso and J. A. Wolfe, Synthesis of Carboxylic Acids,
Esters and Their Derivatives, ed. S. Patai and Z. Rappoport, John
Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1991, pp. 465–476.
2 (a) J. March, Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms
and Structure, 4th edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1992, pp.
397–398 and references therein; (b) M. G. Stanton, C. B. Allen, R. M.
Kissling, A. L. Linclon and M. R. Gagne´, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998,
120, 5981 and references therein; (c) R. M. Kissling and M. R. Gagne´,
J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 9005.
3 (a) T. Okano, K. Miyamoto and J. Kiji, Chem. Lett., 1995, 246; (b) P.
Dutta, A. Sarkar and B. C. Ranu, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 6027; (c) L.
Baldini, C. Bracchini, R. Cacciapaglia, A. Casnati, L. Mandolini and
R. Ungaro, Chem. Eur. J., 2000, 6, 1322; (d) R. Cacciapaglia, S. Di
Stephano, E. Kelderman and L. Mandolini, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
1999, 38, 349; (e) W. M. Stevels, M. J. K. Ankone´, P. J. Dijkstra
and J. Feijen, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 8296; (f) N. J. Hinde and
C. D. Hall, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1998, 1249 and references
therein; (g) J. Otton, S. Ratton, V. A. Vasnev, G. D. Markova, K. M.
Nametov, V. I. Bakhmutov, L. I. Komarova, S. V. Vinogradova and
V. V. Ko r s h a k , J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem., 1998, 26, 2199;
(h) R. Cacciapaglia, S. Di Stephano and L. Mandolini, J. Org. Chem.,
2001, 66, 5926.
23 (a) J. J. Ryan and A. A. Humffray, J. Chem. Soc. (B), 1966, 842;
(b) T. C. Bruice and M. Mayahi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1960, 82, 3067;
(c) J. F. Kirsch and W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86, 837.
24 C. G. Mitton, R. L. Schowen, M. Gresser and J. Shapley, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1969, 91, 2036.
25 We thank Professor Andrew Williams for helpful discussions on this
point.
26 Using the available data23 for the −OH-catalyzed hydrolysis of aryl,
the Brønsted b is computed to be ∼−0.6 for aryl groups which do
not contain strongly withdrawing resonators.
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 5 , 3 , 6 5 – 7 2
7 1