Purification and Characterization of a Novel Pyrethroid Hydrolase
J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 53, No. 19, 2005 7419
DISCUSSION
approximately equal activity toward permethrin isomers.
This feature is different from that of carboxylesterase E3
from Nephotettix cincticeps Uhler (21) and carboxylesterase
(BAC36707) (25), indicating that the purified enzyme lacked
stereoselectivity. The comparison of Km and kcat revealed that
the pyrethroid hydrolase has about 10-fold higher affinity toward
trans-permethrin than deltamethrin and can hydrolyze the former
about 65-fold faster than the latter. The catalytic efficiencies
(kcat/Km) are considered as a measurement of the enzyme
specificity; among these, trans-permethrin is clearly the pre-
ferred substrate, due to either steric hindrance of hydrolysis or
stabilization of the est bond. Replacement of the chlorovinyl
group of the pyrethoids with bromovinyl also affected the rate
of hydrolysis by the enzyme. Cypermethrin was more readily
transformed than deltamethrin, in agreement with findings for
the permethrinase from Bacillus cereus (9), pyrethroid-
hydrolyzing carboxylesterase (BAC36707) from mouse liver
microsomes, and the esterases associated with mammalian
microsomal fractions (27), suggesting that the pyrethroid
hydrolase has a specific preference for the properties of the
halogen atoms.
In conclusion, the pyrethroid hydrolase described here differs
from those previously reported in at least one of the following
aspects: molecular mass, pI, pH, and temperature optima. These
differences of the isofunctional enzyme suggest diversity in
evolution and a spread of pyrethroid hydrolase gene among
different microorganisms. Environments contaminated with
pyrethroid are regarded as hazardous because the pesticides are
considered to be an endocrine-disrupting chemical (28). Thus,
a technique for rapid degradation of the compounds is required.
In view of the resistance to many metals, leakage requirement
for cofactors, relatively broad pH and temperature optimum,
and higher activity against a range of pesticides, the purified
enzyme could conceivably be developed to fulfill the practical
requirements to enable its use in situ for detoxification of
pyrethroids where they cause environmental contamination
problems. Further study is helpful to establish more molecular
knowledge on gene overexpression and regulatory mechanisms.
A few bacterial isolates possessing pyrethroid hydrolase
activity have been isolated, whereas pyrethroid-degrading
enzymatic preparations have not been reported to date on the
fungus. This is the first report to our knowledge on the
production, purification, and properties of a pyrethroid hydrolase
from fungus. The production of pyrethroid hydrolase from
Aspergillus niger ZD11 depended strongly on the carbon
sources. When glucose was added in the minimal medium as
carbon source, cell extract showed no or only a trace level of
the enzyme activity. The pyrethroid was the best carbon source
for the production of intracellular pyrethroid hydrolase. The
specific activity of the purified enzyme under optimal conditions
was 31.1 U mg-1 of protein on trans-permethrin, whereas the
specific activities reported for pyrethroid hydrolase toward trans-
permethrin were from 0.0146 to 0.597 U mg of protein-1 (9,
21, 25). Therefore, the purified enzyme from Aspergillus niger
ZD11 is among the most efficient pyrethroid hydrolase described
so far. As a monomeric 53 kDa protein, the purified enzyme is
also similar to some known pyrethroid hydrolase, whose
molecular masses range from 58.6 to 61 kDa (9, 21, 25). The
optimum pH of the purified enzyme was lower than that
recorded from Bacillus cereus (pH 7.5) (9). The optimal
temperature of 45 °C was higher than that recorded for Bacillus
cereus (37 °C) (9).
The effects observed in the presence of potential inhibitors
or activators of the purified enzyme activity were investigated.
The purified enzyme was significantly affected by sulfhydryl
oxidant metals (Hg2+, Ag+), while other metal ions did not have
a remarkable effect on the activity. This suggested that thiol
may be involved in the active catalytic site. Furthermore, activity
was completely inhibited by thiol-modifying reagents such as
PCMB, therefore, suggesting again that sulfhydryl groups may
be involved in the catalytic center of the enzyme, substrate
binding, and/or recognition (26). EDTA and 1,10-phenanthroline
did not affect activity, indicating that divalent cations are not
required for enzyme activity. This property is similar to that
noted in Bacillus cereus, lacking any requirement for metal ions
at the active site (9).
LITERATURE CITED
The purified enzyme not only hydrolyzed various F-nitro-
phenyl esters of short-medium chain fatty acids, but also
degraded many pesticides with similar carboxylester such as
cypermethrin, permethrin, fenvalerate, deltamethrin, and mala-
thion, which is an organophosphorus pesticide, indicating that
the purified enzyme is an esterase with broader specificity.
However, this observation does not quite agree with data
reported by Motoyama et al., Maloney et al., and Stok et al. (9,
21, 25). The pyrethroid-hydrolyzing carboxylesterase (BAC36707)
from mouse liver microsomes and permethrinase from Bacillus
cereus did not hydrolyze malathion. On the other hand,
Motoyama et al. found that one of five forms of carboxy-
lesterases degraded malathion twice as fast as the fenvalerate,
and three other forms possessed approximately equal activity
toward these two insecticides. Furthermore, the hydrolysis of
cis-permethrin, trans-permethrin, cypermethrin, fenvalerate, and
deltamethrin by the purified pyrethroid hydrolase was much
higher than that of pyrethroid-hydrolyzing carboxylesterase
(BAC36707) from mouse liver microsomes and carboxylesterase
E3 from Nephotettix cincticeps Uhler (21, 25). In a previous
paper, there was a preference in both mammal and insect
carboxylesterases for permethrin to cypermethrin, and trans-
permethrin to cis-permethrin (21, 25). Yet the carboxylesterase
from Nephotettix cincticeps Uhler preferred cis-permethrin to
trans-permethrin. In this study, pyrethroid hydrolase possessed
(1) Shan, G. M.; Huang, H. Z.; Stoutamire, D. W.; Gee, S. J.; Leng,
G.; Hammock, B. D. A sensitive class specific immunoassay
for the detection of pyrethroid metabolites in human urine. Chem.
Res. Toxicol. 2004, 17, 218-225.
(2) Lee, S. J.; Gan, J. Y.; Kabashima, J. Recovery of synthetic
pyrethroids in water samples during storage and extraction. J.
Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 7194-7198.
(3) Class, T. J.; Kintrup, J. Pyrethroids as household insecticides-
analysis, indoor exposure and persistence. Fresenius’ J. Anal.
Chem. 1991, 340, 446-453.
(4) Park, E. K.; Kim, J. H.; Gee, S. J.; Watanabe, T.; Ahn, K. C.;
Hammock, B. D. Determination of pyrethroid residues in
agricultural products by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 5572-5576.
(5) Mian, L. S.; Mulla, M. S. Effects of pyrethroid insectides on
nontarget invertebrates in aquatic ecosystem. J. Agric. Entomol.
1992, 9, 73-98.
(6) Martinez Galera, M.; Martinez Vidal, J. L.; Garrido Frenich, A.;
Gil Garcia, M. D. Determination of cypermethrin, fenvalerate
and cis- and trans-permethrin in soil and groudwater by high-
performance liquid chromatography using partial least-squares
regression. J. Chromatogr., A 1996, 7, 39-46.
(7) Horne, I.; Sutherland, T. D.; Harcourt, R. L.; Russell, R. J.;
Oakeshott, J. G. Identification of an opd (organophosphate
degradation) gene in an Agrobacterium isolate. Appl. EnViron.
Microbiol. 2002, 68, 3371-3376.