P.R. Campodónico et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 488 (2010) 86–89
89
philic Fukui function, namely, fkꢁðO1Þ = 0.003, fkꢁðN2Þ = 0.001 and
fkꢁðN2Þ = 0.004 for the keto form and fkꢁðO1Þ = 0.051,
fkꢁðN2Þ = 0.208 and q(N2) = 0.231 for the enol form. These results
reinforce the hypothesis based on experimental data that the
nucleophilic site is the terminal N3 atom (see Scheme 3 for atom
numbering). This result also explain the low response in the rate
coefficients to inductive substituent effects: the marginal activa-
tion/deactivation patterns induced by electron releasing and elec-
tron withdrawing substituents may be traced to the fact that
being the terminal N3 site the active nucleophilic center for these
reactions, substituent at p-positions in the ring are too much far
from the site of reaction at N3. Substituent effects should be more
important at the carbonyl site but after the results obtained here
they should have relevant effects on the keto-enol tautomerism,
not at the nucleophilic attack stage of the reaction.
The product analysis for the reaction between 4-nitrophenyl
acetate and benzohydrazide in the same experimental conditions
corresponded to 4-nitrophenolate anion and the corresponding
diacylhydrazine, thereby reinforcing the theoretical prediction.
The identification of the products was achieved by comparison of
the UV–vis and HPLC spectra after completion of the reactions with
those of authentic samples of 4-nitrophenol and diacylhydrazine in
accord to Scheme 3. The latter was synthesized as reported previ-
ously by Carlsen and Jorgensen protocol [22].
mechanism incorporating keto-enol pre-equilibria is proposed.
The study is completed with a local reactivity analysis describing
the most reactive centers for nucleophilic attack, and the predicted
selectivity was confirmed by products study.
Acknowledgements
This work received financial support from project Clínica Alem-
ana-Universidad del Desarrollo 8011046 and Fondecyt Projects:
1070715 and 11060195.
References
[1] E.V. Titov, A.P. Grekov, V.I. Rybachenko, V.V. Shevchenko, Teoreticheskaya I
´
Eksperimentalnaya Khimiya 4 (1968) 742.
[2] G.D. Byrkit, G.A. Michalek, Ind. Eng. Chem. 42 (1950) 1862.
[3] H. Feuer, R. Harmetz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 24 (1959) 1501.
[4] E.A. Castro, M. Aliaga, P.R. Campodónico, M. Cepeda, R. Contreras, J.G. Santos, J.
Org. Chem. 74 (2009) 9173.
[5] W.P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80 (1958) 4585.
[6] W.P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80 (1958) 4581.
[7] A.J. Kirby, J.E. Davies, T.A.S. Brandao, P.F. da Silva, W.R. Rocha, F. Nome, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 12374.
[8] M.L. Bender, R.D. Ginger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77 (1954) 348.
[9] A. Williams, Concerted Organic and Bio-Organic Mechanism, CRC Press, Boca
Raton, FL, 2000 (Chapter 4, and references therein).
[10] D. Stefanidis, S. Cho, S. Dhe-Paganon, W.P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1993)
1650.
[11] M.J. Gresser, W.P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96 (1974) 7018.
[12] W.P. Jencks, M. Gilchrist, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90 (1968) 2622.
[13] G. Manoussakis, M. Haristos, C. Youri, Can. J. Chem. 51 (1973) 811.
[14] M.L. Bender, Chem. Rev. 60 (1960) 53.
[15] E.A. Castro, R.B. Moodie, J. Chem. Soc. Commun. (1973) 828.
[16] M.J. Gresser, W.P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99 (1977) 6963.
[17] C. Hansch, A. Leo, R.W. Taft, Chem. Rev. 97 (1991) 165.
[18] P.R. Campodónico, P. Fuentealba, E.A. Castro, J.G. Santos, R. Contreras, J. Org.
Chem. 70 (2005) 1754.
[19] M.J. Frisch et al., GAUSSIAN 98, Revision A.6, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
[20] R. Contreras, J. Andrés, V.S. Safont, P.R. Campodónico, J.G. Santos, J. Phys. Chem.
A 107 (2003) 5588.
[21] G. Klopman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90 (1968) 223.
[22] P.H.J. Carlsen, K.B. Jorgensen, J. Het. Chem. 31 (1994) 805.
3. Concluding remarks
The reaction of a series of benzohydrazide derivatives towards
p-nitrophenyl acetate have been both kinetically and theoretically
studied. The kinetic data are consistent with a stepwise mecha-
nism with the nucleophilic attack as the rate determining step.
From the theoretical analysis it is found that benzohydrazide
derivatives establish intramolecular proton rearrangement. The
enol form appears as the active species for nucleophilic attack
and this result consistently explain the low response in the reac-
tion rate coefficients to inductive substituent effects. A reaction