C. Li et al.
Bioorganic Chemistry 111 (2021) 104847
(S)-protopanaxadiol [30]. Consequently, the structure of 1 was deduced
as (20S,24R)-dammarane-24-hydroxyl-11-O-β-D-quinovopyranosyl and
named cyclocarioside Z9.
β-oriented. The ROESY cross peaks of H-5/H-9/H-17/H-CH3-21/H-CH3-
30 suggested that H-5, H-9, H-17, CH3-21, CH3-24, and CH3-30 are
α
-oriented (Fig. 3). Furthermore, to determine the absolute configura-
Cyclocarioside Z10 (2) was established to have the molecular formula
C43H74O14 by the negative ion HRESIMS peak at m/z 813.4999 [Mꢀ H]ꢀ
(calcd 813.5000 for C43H73O14) (Fig. S9). The 1H NMR data (pyr-
idine‑d5, Table 1, Fig. S10) of 2 showed eight methyl singlets at δH 0.76
(s, 30-CH3), 0.93 (s, 28-CH3), 1.08 (s, 18-CH3), 1.24 (s, 29-CH3), 1.33 (s,
19-CH3), 1.25 (s, 21-CH3), 1.29 (s, 27-CH3), and 1.50 (s, 26-CH3), a
doublet methyl signal at δ 1.55 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 6′’-CH3) and two
glycosyl anomeric protons aHt δH 5.49 (m, H-1′) and 5.03 (d, J = 7.7 Hz,
H-1′’). The 13C NMR (pyridine‑d5, Table 3, Fig. S11) and DEPT (dis-
tortionless enhancement by polarization transfer, pyridine‑d5) spectra
displayed the existence of eight methyl carbon signals at δ 17.4 (C-18),
17.0 (C-19), 27.0 (C-21), 27.7 (C-26), 29.2 (C-27), 23.2 (CC-28), 29.2 (C-
tion for chiral centers C-3/11/17/20 of 3, the comparisons of the carbon
signals of compound 3 at δC 79.5 (C-3), 77.1 (C-11), 50.8 (C-17), 74.7 (C-
20) to those of analogous dammaranes demonstrated its chiral centers to
be 3R, 11R, 17S, and 20S [20,36]. Thus, the structure of 3 was deduced
as
(20S,23E)-dammarane-11-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-3-O-α-L-arabino-
furanoside and named cyclocarioside Z11
.
Cyclocarioside Z12 (4) was separated as a white amorphous powder.
The molecular formula of C35H58O11 of 4 was determined by a positive
sodium ion HRESIMS peak at m/z 677.3880 [M+Na]+ (calcd 677.3877
for C35H58O11Na) (Fig. S25). The 1H- and 13C NMR data of 4 (pyr-
idine‑d5, Tables 1 and 3) were similar to those of cyclocarioside P [34],
with the exception of the resonances of the side chain and connecting
positions of the glycosyl units, suggesting that 4 also possessed a
dammarane-type triterpenoid skeleton. The side chain is cleaved be-
tween C-20 and C-22, which is followed by the formation of a keto group
at C-20, as confirmed by the HMBC correlations of H-21 (δH 2.07) with
29) and 17.3 (C-30) and two glycosyl anomeric carbon signals δ 106.8
C
(C-1′) and 101.7 (C-1′’). A dammarane-type triterpenoid glycoside
structure was established for compound 2, which is similar to cyclo-
carioside H, except for the signals of the side chain and connecting po-
sition of the glycosyl unit [31]. In the 1H–1H COSY spectrum of 2, the
correlations of H-9/H-11/H-12/H-13/H-17 and H-22/H-23/H-24 sub-
C-17 (δ 54.2) and C-20 (δ 211.3). The 1H–1H correlation spectroscopy
(COSY)Cresults of H-9/H-11/H-12/H-13/H-17/H-16/H-15 in 4 demon-
C
–
–
–
–
stantiated the existence of the two fragments CHCHCH2CHCH and
strated the presence of one
CHCHCH2CHCHCH2CH2 fragment
–
–
CH2CH2CH (Figs. 2 and S14). The HMBC peak from H-21-CH3 (δH
(Figs. 2 and S30). Furthermore, L-arabinose and D-quinovose were
confirmed in the acid hydrolysis solution of 4 by comparing with the
authentic sugars in the HPLC assay (Table 4). The HMBC correlations
from the anomeric protons H-1′ (δ 5.56, br s) to C-3 (δ 79.7) and H-1′’
1.25, s) to C-17 (δ 51.3) suggested that the side chain was connected to
C-17. The connectCions of the two hydroxyl groups at C-24 and C-25 were
determined by the key HMBC correlations of H-26 (δH 1.50, s) to C-24
H
C
(δ 70.3), C-25 (δ 75.0), C-27 (δ 29.2) and H-27 (δ 1.29, s) to C-25 (δ
(δH 4.87, dd) to C-11 (δ 76.6) affirmed that the two glycosyl moieties
C
C
C
H
C
C
75.0) and C-26 (δ 27.7). Furthermore, L-arabinose and D-quinovose
are linked at C-3 and C-11, respectively (Fig. 2). The β-orientations of H-
3, H-11, H-13, H-CH3-19, and H-CH3-29 were then verified by the
ROESY peaks of H-13/H-CH3-18/H-CH3-19. Similarly, the diagnostic
ROESY peaks of H-17 and H-30 demonstrated that H-17 and H-30 are
C
were identified in the acid hydrolysis solution of 2 by comparing with
authentic sugar samples in the HPLC assay (Table 4). The HMBC cor-
relations from the anomeric protons H-1′ (δH 5.49, m) to C-3 (δ 79.9)
C
and H-1′’ (δ 5.03, d) to C-11 (δ 77.3) suggested that L-arabinose and D-
α-oriented (Figs. 3 and S32). In addition, to determine the absolute
quinovose were situated at posiCtions 3 and 11, respectively. The HMBC
configuration for chiral centers C-3/11/17/20 of 4, the comparisons of
the carbon signals of compound 4 at δC 79.7 (C-3), 76.6 (C-11), 50.8 (C-
17) to those of analogous dammaranes suggested its chiral centers to be
3R, 11R, and 17S [20,36]. Thus, compound 4 was elucidated as
H
peak from H-5 -CH3COO (δH 1.96, s) to C-5′ (δC 65.5) demonstrated
′
–
′
–
that CH3COO was linked to position 5 (Fig. 2). Moreover, the diag-
nostic ROESY correlations of H-3/H-11/CH3-19/CH3-29 suggested that
H-3, H-11, CH3-19, and CH3-29 are β-oriented. The correlations of H-5/
(3α,11α)-11-O-β-D-quinovopyranosyl-3-O-α-L-arabinofuranoside-
–
H-9/H-17/H-CH3 21/H-CH3-30 in the ROESY spectrum indicated that
23,24,25,26,27-hexanor-dammarane-20-one and named cyclocarioside
H-5, H-9, H-17, CH3-21, CH3-24, and CH3-30 are
α
-oriented (Fig. 3).
Z12
.
Moreover, to determine the absolute configuration for chiral centers C-
3/11/17/20/24 of 2, the comparisons of the carbon signals of com-
pound 2 at δC 79.9 (C-3), 77.1 (C-11), 50.8 (C-17), 76.3 (C-20) to those
of analogous dammaranes indicated its chiral centers to be 3R, 11R, 17S,
and 20S [20,36]. In addition, the 13C NMR datum at δC 70.3 (C-24) of 2
The molecular formula of cyclocarioside Z13 (5) was deduced to be
C
42H72O12 due to the positive sodium ion HRESIMS peak at m/z
791.4917 [M+Na]+ (calcd 791.4921 for C42H72O12Na) (Fig. S33). The
1H NMR data (pyridine‑d5, Table 1) of 5 showed one double bond
hydrogen signal at δH 5.15 (dt, J = 9.0, 1.3 Hz, 24-H). The detailed
analysis of the NMR data showed that 5 was similar to compound 12,
except for the number and positions of the double bonds and the sub-
stitution of the methoxy group on the side chain, indicating that 5 also
possesses a dammarane skeleton. Compound 5 possessed a double bond
between positions 24 and 25 and a methoxy group linking to position 23
in the side chain. L-arabinose and D-quinovose were confirmed in the
acid hydrolysis solution of 5 by comparing with the authentic sugars in
the HPLC assay (Table 4). The 1H–1H COSY correlations of H-9/H-11/H-
more closely resembled that at δ 70.8 (C-24) of 24R,25-dihydroxyl
C
protopanaxadiol than that at δC 77.1 (C-24) of cyclofoetoside B [32,33].
Thus, compound 2 was deduced as dammarane-(20S,24R,25)-penthy-
droxyl-11-O-β-D-quinovopyranosyl-3-O-(5′-O-acetyl)-
α-L-arabinofurano-
side and named cyclocarioside Z10
.
Cyclocarioside Z11 (3) was determined to have the molecular for-
mula C41H68O12 by a positive sodium ion HRESIMS peak at m/z
775.4613 [M+Na]+ (calcd 775.4608 for C41H68O12Na) (Fig. S17).
1
Detailed analyses of the H- and 13C NMR data (pyridine‑d5, Tables 1
12/H-13/H-17/H-16/H-15 and H-22 (δ 2.14, m, 1.67, m)/H-23 (δ
H
and 3) demonstrated that 3 showed features that were closely similar to
4.39, m)/H-24 (δH 5.15, dt, 9.0, 1.3) demonstrated the presence of thHe
–
– –
–
those of cyclocarioside P, except the quinovopyranosyl moiety was
fragments CHCHCH2CHCHCH2CH2 and CH2CHCH (Figs. 2 and
S38). The connection of the side chain to position 17 was determined by
the key HMBC correlations of δ 1.43 (s, H-21) to δ 50.8 (C-17), δ 74.6
replaced by a glucopyranoside moiety [34]. α-L-Arabinopyranose and
β-D-glucopyranoside were confirmed in the hydrolysate of 3 by
comparing with the authentic samples in the HPLC assay (Table 4). The
1H–1H COSY correlations of H-9/H-11/H-12/H-13/H-17 and H-22/H-
23/H-24 of 3 demonstrated the presence of the two fragments
H
C
C
(C-20), and δC 45.1 (C-22), those of δH 1.69 (s, H-26) to δC 127.3 (C-24),
δ 135.8 (C-25), and δ 26.1 (C-27), and the HMBC correlation of δ 3.19
(s, 23-OCH3) to δC 76C.1 (C-23) (Fig. 2). The diagnostic ROESY correla-
C
H
–
– –
–
CHCHCH2CHCH and CH2CHCH (Figs. 2 and S22). The HMBC
tion of H-23 and H-21 suggested that CH3-21 and H-23 are α-oriented,
correlations from the anomeric protons H-1′ (δ 5.52, br s) to C-3 (δ
indicating that the methoxy group at position 23 in the side chain is
β-oriented (Fig. 3). In addition, compound 5 and cycloarta-24-ene-
3β,23-diol possess almost the same fragments on the side chain.
79.5) and H-1′’ (δH 5.06, br s) to C-11 (δ 77.1)Hsuggested that the two
sugar units were situated at positions 3Cand 11, respectively (Fig. 2).
Furthermore, in the diagnostic ROESY of 3, the correlations of H-3/H-
11/CH3-19/CH3-29 indicated that H-3, H-11, CH3-19, and CH3-29 are
C
Considering their 13C NMR data, the 13C NMR data of δ 127.3 (C-24)
C
C
and δ 135.8 (C-25) of 5 more closely resembled those of δ 128.4 (C-24)
C
8