P. Selvam et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 3071–3075
3075
2. (a) Keinan, E.; Greenspoon, N.; Rappoport, P. The
Chemistry of Enones, Part 2; Wiley: New York, 1989; (b)
Baik, W.; Rhee, J. U.; Lee, N. H.; Kim, B. H.; Kim, K. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 2793–2794; (c) Corey, E. J.;
Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1986–2012;
(d) Larock, R. C. Comprehensive Organic Transforma-
tions: A Guide to Functional Group Preparation, 2nd ed.;
Wiley-VCH: New York, 1999; pp 821–828; (e) Ohkuma,
T.; Takeno, H.; Honda, Y.; Nayori, R. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2001, 343, 369–375; (f) Alonso, F.; Beletskaya, I. P.; Yus,
M. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4009–4092; (g) Moisan, L.;
Hardouin, C.; Rousseau, B.; Doris, E.. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 2013–2015; (h) Jurkauskas, V.; Sadighi, J. P.;
Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2417–2420.
3. (a) de Graauw, C. F.; Peters, J. A.; van Bekkum, H.;
Huskens, J. Synthesis 1994, 1007–1017; (b) Node, M.;
Nishide, K.; Shigeta, Y.; Shiraki, H.; Obata, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1927–1936; (c) Ukisu, Y.; Miya-
dera, T. J. Mol. Catal. A 1997, 125, 135–142; (d) Ukisu,
Y.; Miyadera, T. Appl. Catal. B 2003, 40, 141–149; (e)
10. (a) Kresge, C. T.; Leonowicz, M. E.; Roth, W. T.; Vartuli,
J. C.; Beck, J. S. Nature 1992, 359, 710–712; (b) Selvam,
P.; Bhatia, S. K.; Sonwane, C. G. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
2001, 40, 3237–3261.
11. The preparation of PdMCM-41 was carried out as
follows: Initially, 6.8 mL of tetramethylammonium
hydroxide (TMAOH; 25% in water; Aldrich) was taken
in 10 mL of water and stirred for 15 min. To this, one-third
(1.5 g) of the total fumed silica (SiO2; Aldrich; an
exceptionally pure form (98.8%) of nano-sized (11 nm)
silica with high surface area (255 m2 gꢀ1)) was added
slowly and the resulting mixture was designated as
ÔSolution-AÕ. In the next step, ÔSolution-BÕ was prepared
by stirring 7.02 g cetyltrimethylammonim bromide
(CTAB; Aldrich) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH; 0.742 g
in 5 mL water; Loba) in 18 mL distilled water, and stirred
for 30 min. Subsequently, ÔSolution-AÕ was added drop-
wise to ÔSolution-BÕ followed by the addition of the
remaining fumed silica (3.0 g), which resulted in the
formation of a gel. The resulting gel was then stirred for
another 30 min. In addition, the gel was further stirred for
another 30 min after adding 10 mL of water. Finally,
palladium acetate solution (0.127 g in 5 mL water; Loba)
was added dropwise to the gel and stirred for 15 min. A
final volume of water (29 mL) was then added to the gel,
which was then stirred for a further 1 h so that a
homogeneous gel resulted. The pH was maintained at
11.4. The final gel had the following (molar) composition:
1SiO2:0.27CTAB:0.26NaOH:0.26TMAOH:60H2O:0.01PdO
(Si/Pd ¼ 100). The gel was then transferred into a Teflon-
lined stainless steel autoclave and kept in an air oven for
crystallization at 423 K for 72 h. The solid product, that is,
synthesized PdMCM-41, obtained was washed, filtered, and
dried in air oven at 353 K for 12 h. The synthesized sample
was calcined under a N2 flow at 823 K for 2 h followed by
8 h in air. The yield of PdMCM-41 obtained was about 85%
with respect to the starting amount of fumed silica.
12. The presence of strong Lewis acid sites was confirmed by
NH3–TPDmeasurements (peak in the range 833–913 K).
13. In a typical reaction, the substrate (10 mmol) was dis-
solved in methanol (10 mL) to which ammonium formate
(30 mmol) was added as a hydrogen donor along with the
catalyst (PdMCM-41; 50 mg). The reaction mixture was
then refluxed at 343 K for several minutes to a few hours
depending on the nature of the substrates. The progress of
the reaction was monitored by TLC, and the products
were analyzed using GC (Eshika) fitted with an OV-17
column. After completion of the reaction, the catalyst was
recovered for the recycling studies by simple filtration,
washed several times with acetone followed by distilled
water, then activated at 373 K for 6 h.
ꢀ
ꢀ
Aramendıa, M. A.; Borau, V.; Jimenez, C.; Marinas,
J. M.; Ruiz, J. R.; Urbano, F. Appl. Catal. A 2003, 249,
1–9.
4. (a) Beaupere, D.; Bauer, P.; Nadjo, L.; Uzan, R.
J. Organomet. Chem. 1982, 238, C12–C14; (b) Visintin,
M.; Spogliarich, R.; Kaspar, J.; Graziani, M. J. Mol.
Catal. 1984, 24, 277–280; (c) Khai, B. T.; Arcelli, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6599–6602; (d) Grushin, V. V.;
Alper, H. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 1047–1062.
5. (a) Gallezot, P. In Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis;
Wiley: New York, 1997; Vol. 5, pp 2209–2221; (b) Ryndin,
Y. A.; Santini, C. C.; Prat, D.; Basset, J. M. J. Catal. 2000,
190, 364–373; (c) De Bruyn, M.; De Vos, D. E.; Jacobs, P.
A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 1120–1125; (d) Adimur-
thy, S.; Ramachandraiah, G.; Bedekar, A. V. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 6391–6392; (e) Cellier, P. A.; Spindler,
J.-F.; Taillefer, M.; Cristau, H.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44, 7191–7195.
6. (a) Sommovigo, M.; Alper, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
59–62; (b) von Holleben, M. L. A.; Zucolotto, M.; Zini, C.
A.; Oliveira, E. R. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 973–978; (c)
Urbano, F. J.; Marinas, J. M. J. Mol. Catal. A 2001, 173,
329–345.
7. Kantam, M. L.; Bandyopadhyay, T.; Rahman, A.; Reddy,
N. M.; Choudary, B. M. J. Mol. Catal. A 1998, 133, 293–
295.
8. (a) Sakthivel, A.; Badamali, S. K.; Selvam, P. Catal.
Lett. 2002, 80, 73–76; (b) Mohapatra, S. K.; Hussain,
F.; Selvam, P. Catal. Commun. 2003, 4, 57–62; (c)
Sakthivel, A.; Selvam, P. J. Catal. 2002, 211, 134–143;
(d) Mohapatra, S. K.; Sahoo, B.; Keune, W.; Selvam, P.
Chem. Commun. 2002, 1466–1467; (e) Sakthivel, A.;
Dapurkar, S. E.; Selvam, P. New J. Chem. 2003, 27,
1184–1190; (f) Sakthivel, A.; Dapurkar, S. E.; Selvam, P.
Appl. Catal. A 2003, 246, 283–293; (g) Mohapatra, S. K.;
Sonavane, S. U.; Jayaram, R. V.; Selvam, P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 8527–8529; (h) Mohapatra, S. K.; Sonav-
ane, S. U.; Jayaram, R. V.; Selvam, P. Appl. Catal. B 2003,
46, 155–163; (i) Selvam, P.; Mohapatra, S. K.; Sonavane,
S. U.; Jayaram, R. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2003–
2007.
14. Han, B. H.; Jang, D. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 1181–
1182.
15. The PdMCM-41 catalyst was also tested for its reusability,
and interestingly, the yield was practically unaffected for
up to three cycles for these substrates. The catalyst was
also used for the reduction of cinnamaldehyde (up to six
cycles) without significant change in the yield of cinnamyl
alcohol (first run ¼ 90%; sixth run ¼ 88%). The XRD
pattern of the recycled PdMCM-41 catalyst (after the sixth
run) and BET surface area measurement showed that the
structural integrity remained unaltered after reuse. The
mesoporous nature of the reused catalyst was confirmed
by N2 adsorption measurements (BET surface area ¼
985 m2 gꢀ1, pore volume ¼ 0.85 cm3 gꢀ1, and pore size
9. X-ray diffractograms (Rigaku-miniflex, Cu-Ka) of both
synthesized and calcined PdMCM-41 showed patterns
typical of hexagonal mesoporous systems.7 Further, N2
adsorption measurements (BET surface area; 970 m2 gꢀ1
,
pore volume; 0.78 cm3 gꢀ1, and pore size; 31 A) support the
mesoporous nature of the sample. ICP-AES analysis
shows 2.8 wt% Pd loading in the catalyst.
31 A). Overall there was no major detrimental effect
ꢁ
ꢁ
observed from the reaction conditions over the structural
properties of PdMCM-41.