(TBAF, HOAc, THF, room temperature) provided the known
enyne 4. The yield of this last step mainly reflects difficulties
in isolation due to the volatility of the compound. The vinyl
ketone 5 was prepared from azelaic acid monomethyl ester
(8) via a Stille type cross-coupling11 as shown in eq 3.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis and Synthesis of
Tetrahydrodicranenone B (1)a
Scheme 1 outlines the synthesis of tetrahydrodicranenone
B from the two subunits, 4 and 5. Subjecting a 1:1 mixture
of these two building blocks and lithium bromide to a two-
component ruthenium-tin catalyst12 in acetone at 60 °C gave
a 4:1 mixture of the Z and E bromoalkenes (only the major
(Z)-bromoalkene depicted). Despite little precedent for
Barbier reactions mediated by chromous chloride-nickel
chloride with ketones,13,14 this intramolecular reaction pro-
ceeded very well with ketones under standard conditions to
give the desired cyclopentenol 2. PDC-promoted allylic
rearrangement simultaneous with oxidation7 produced the
desired cyclopentenone as its ester, the hydrolysis of which
gave the target 1.
a (a) 10% CpRu(CH3CN)3PF6, 15% SnBr4, LiBr, CH3COCH3,
60 °C; (b) CrCl2, NiCl2, DMF, room temperature; (c) PDC, CH2Cl2,
0 °C; (d) LiOH, H2O, dioxane, 60 °C.
alcohols.7 A Barbier type reaction of Z-vinyl bromide 3
constitutes a ring-forming appraoch to the requisite allyl
alcohol 2. On the basis of a new ruthenium-catalyzed three-
component coupling under development in these laborato-
ries,8 the alkyne 4 and the enone 5 become the starting
materials.
The facility of the sequence led us to develop this strategy
for a synthesis of rosaprostol (8), an antiulcer drug marketed
as the sodium salt under the name Rosal. It displays gastric
antisecretory activity devoid of many side effects of other
prostanoids.5 Scheme 2 illustrates the retrosynthetic analysis.
Since cyclopentanone 9 is a known precursor,6 the corre-
sponding cyclopentenone 10 represents a reasonable inter-
mediate. Following the logic as outlined for tetrahydro-
dicranenone B, alkyne 13 and vinyl ketone 14 become the
basic building blocks. Alkyne 13 is available by simple
Fischer esterification of the corresponding commercially
available 8-nonynoic acid. Known vinyl ketone 1415 is
available from heptanoic acid via the Stille cross-coupling
in identical fashion to the synthesis of vinyl ketone 5 (eq 3).
As shown in Scheme 2, the ruthenium-catalyzed three-
component coupling proceeded in a fashion similar to that
used previously to give a 70% yield of a 4:1 Z:E ratio of
vinyl bromides (only the major Z-vinyl bromide 12 de-
picted.). Subjecting the mixture to the Ni-Cr-mediated
Barbier type reaction gave a 71% isolated yield of allyl
alcohol 11 whose oxidative rearrangement produced cyclo-
pentenone 10 straightforwardly. Catalytic hydrogenation
using Pd/C delivered a 3:1 trans:cis ratio of 2,3-disubstituted
cyclopentanones. However, base hydrolysis of the ester was
accompanied by equilibration to give only the E cyclopen-
tanone-carboxylic acid. Sodium borohydride reduction as
reported in the literature produced rosaprostol 8.
The known enyne 49 was derived as outlined in eq 2. The
mesylate 6b prepared from commercially available (Z)-2-
penten-1-ol (6a) (MsCl, (C2H5)3N, THF, 0 °C), underwent
copper-mediated displacement with trimethylsilylacetylene
(CuI, NaI, K2CO3, DMF, room temperature)10 to give 7 in
addition to the product of SN2′ displacement in a 3-9:1 ratio
depending upon the amount of copper iodide. Desilylation
(6) For syntheses, see: (a) Mikolajczyk, M.; Zurawinski, R. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 8894. (b) Tanimori, S.; Kainuki, T.; Nakayama, M. Biosci.
Biotech. Biochem. 1992, 56, 1807. (c) Shono, T.; Kise, N.; Fujimoto, T.;
Tominaga, N.; Morita, H. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 7175. (d) Valcavi, U.;
Innocenti, S.; Bosone, E.; Farina, P.; Marotta, V.; Zabban, G. B. Eur. Pat.
Appl. EP 155392; Chem. Abstr. 1986, 104, 168263C.
(7) Dauben, W. G.; Michno, D. M. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 682.
Majetich, G.; Condon, S.; Hull, K.; Ahmad, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30,
1033.
(8) Trost, B. M.; Pinkerton, A. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 360.
(9) Billington, D. C.; Bladon, P.; Helps, I. M.; Pauson, P. L.; Thomson,
W.; Willison, D. J. Chem. Res. 1988, 10, 2601.
(10) Jeffery, T.; Gueugnot, S.; Linstrumelle, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992,
33, 5757. Lapitskaya, M. A.; Vasiljeva, L. L.; Pivnitsky, K. K. Synthesis
1993, 65.
(11) For a representative procedure, see: Darwish, I. S.; Patel, C.; Miller,
M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6072. For a review, see: Farina, V.;
Krishnamurthy, V.; Scott, W. J. The Stille Reaction; Wiley: New York,
1998.
The chemoselectivity exhibited in the ruthenium-catalyzed
three-component coupling should make this a versatile
(12) For the ruthenium-acetonitrile complex, see: Gill, T. P.; Mann,
K.R. Organometallics 1982, 1, 485.
(15) Galatsis, P.; Millan, S. D.; Faber, T. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1215.
Nakahira, H.; Ryu, I.; Ikebe, M.; Oku, Y.; Ogawa, A.; Kambe, N.; Sonoda,
N.; Murai, S. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 17.
(16) Floyd, J. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 15, 2877. Kim, B. M.; Guare,
J. P. Hanifin, C. M.; Arford-Bickerstaff, D. J.; Vacca, J. P.; Ball, R. G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5153.
(13) For a review, see: Cintas, P. Synthesis 1992, 248.
(14) For an intramolecular example, see: Chen, X.-T.; Bhattacharya, S.
K.; Zhou, B.; Gutteridge, C. E.; Pettus, T. R. R.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6563. For a recent modification for reactions with
ketones, see: Chen, C. Synlett 1998, 1311.
1602
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 11, 2000