LETTER
A New Entry to Sonochemical/Efficient Agitation Switching
199
The deoxygenation of epoxides is a challenging area of re- utilising ultrasonic irradiation promotes a single-electron-
search, since the successful reduction presents the epoxide transfer (SET) process that could be similar to that report-
unit as a viable protecting group for alkenes.6,7 Several re- ed by Huang and co-workers, presumably aromatic sys-
search groups have developed processes for epoxide de- tems tend to undergo the SET process due to stabilisation
oxygenation, often requiring harsh reaction conditions or of the benzyl radical, which cannot be achieved when em-
expensive gold catalysts.8,9 Recently Huang and co-work- ploying aliphatic epoxides. However, under our condi-
ers have reported the electrochemically supported deoxy- tions we do not observe alkene formation in the absence
genation of epoxides into alkenes in aqueous solution and of carbon dioxide, and we also do not observe conversion
this prompted us to investigate our system further.10
of cyclic carbonate to alkenes under the reaction condi-
tions.15
Intrigued by our initial findings we performed a series of
control reactions in which we found that it was essential We are also investigating the factors that influence the ra-
to have a carbon dioxide atmosphere (under argon no re- tio of products in our laboratory and full results will be
action was observed), in the absence of current no reaction published in due course.
occurred and without heating we still observed alkene for-
mation (67% conversion by 1H NMR).
Acknowledgment
With our optimised conditions in hand we then chose to
screen a range of substrates to see what effect substituents
would make to the deoxygenation reaction, with mixed re-
sults (Table 1). As a general rule under our conditions al-
iphatic epoxides produced the cyclic carbonate in
excellent conversion but di-, and trisubstituted epoxides
remained untouched. Styrene oxide remains the only sub-
strate to fully convert to the alkene with no trace of the
corresponding cyclic carbonate and disappointingly there
appears to be no correlation with the electron-withdraw-
ing or electron-donating ability of the substituents present
on the aromatic substrates. However, this work does rep-
resent the first report of sonochemical switching for this
type of process. We also found that aziridine substrates
were compatible with our carbon dioxide incorporation
process but they too did not undergo formation of the par-
ent alkene under sonochemical conditions (Scheme 4).13
B.R.B. and K.G.U.W. would like to thank Research Councils UK
for RCUK fellowships and Loughborough University for funding a
PhD studentship to A.P.P.
References and Notes
(1) Styring P., Jansen D., de Coninck H., Armstrong K.; Carbon
Capture and Utilisation in the Green Economy, Report No.
501; The Centre For Low Carbon Futures: Birmingham, UK,
2011; ISBN 978-0-9572588-0-8.
(2) Buckley, B. R.; Patel, A. P.; Wijayantha, K. G. U. Chem.
Commun. 2011, 47, 11888.
(3) (a) Cravotto, G.; Cintas, P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46,
5476; Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 5573. (b) Ando, T.; Sumi,
S.; Kawate, T.; Ichihara, J.; Hanafusa, T. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1984, 439.
(4) Kegelaers, Y.; Eulaerts, O.; Reisse, J.; Segebarth, N. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 3683.
(5) (a) Corey, E. J.; Su, W. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109,
7534. (b) Kraus, G. A.; Thomas, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 1988,
53, 1395. (c) Johnson, W. S.; Plummer, M. S.; Reddy, S. P.;
Bartlett, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 515.
(6) Corey, E. J.; Su, W. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 7534.
(7) See for some recent examples: (a) Mahesh, M.; Murphy, J.
A.; Wessel, H. P. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4118. (b) Choi, K.
H.; Choi, K. I.; Kim, J. H.; Yoon, C. M.; Yoo, B. W. Bull.
Korean Chem. Soc. 2005, 26, 1495. (c) Firouzabadi, H.;
Iranpoor, N.; Jafarpour, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46,
4107. (d) Oh, K.; Knabe, W. E. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2966.
(e) Iranpoor, N.; Firouzabadi, H.; Jamalian, A. Tetrahedron
2006, 62, 1823. (f) Justicia, J.; Jimenez, T.; Morcillo, S. P.;
Cuerva, J. M.; Oltra, J. E. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10837.
(g) Noujima, A.; Mitsudome, T.; Mizugaki, T.; Jitsukawa,
K.; Kaneda, K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2986.
(8) (a) Mitsudome, T.; Noujima, A.; Mikami, Y.; Mizugaki, T.;
Jitsukawa, K.; Kaneda, K. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 11818.
(b) Mitsudome, T.; Noujima, A.; Mikami, Y.; Mizugaki, T.;
Jitsukawa, K.; Kaneda, K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
5545. (c) Noujima, A.; Mitsudome, T.; Mizugaki, T.;
Jitsukawa, K.; Kaneda, K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
2986. (d) Ni, J.; He, L.; Liu, Y.-M.; Cao, Y.; He, H.-Y.; Fan,
K.-N. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 812.
O
N
O
Mg
Cu
R
O
A
CO2 (1 atm)
+
N
Bu4NBr (1.0 equiv), MeCN
60 mA, 6 h, 50 °C + )))
R
N
R = Me 3: 95:5 ratio A:B, 87% yield
R = Ph 4: 0:100 ratio A:B, 32% yield
O
R
B
Scheme 4 Formation of cyclic carbamates; no denitrogenation is ob-
served under sonochemical conditions
In conclusion we have identified a new entry into the so-
nochemical switching process that works well for styrene
oxide but further investigations are required in order to
develop this into a practical approach to alkene group pro-
tection as epoxides. We are currently investigating the
proposed mechanism, under standard heating and stirring
conditions. We believe that an ionic mechanism similar to
that reported by North and co-workers14 is in operation as
retention of stereochemical information in the final cyclic
carbonate product is observed when employing enantio-
merically enriched epoxides. We believe that the reaction
(9) Huang, J.-M.; Lin, Z.-Q.; Chen, D.-S. Org. Lett. 2012, 14,
22.
(10) Representative Procedure for the Standard Synthesis of
Phenyl Ethylene Carbonate (Ref. 2): Styrene oxide (1;
0.12 g, 1.0 mmol) and CO2 (balloon) in MeCN (150 mL)
were electrolysed (constant current: 60 mA) for 6 h in a
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Synlett 2014, 25, 197–200