Intermediates in Oxidation Catalyzed by Heme−Thiolate
A R T I C L E S
intermediate is responsible for the oxidation reaction even in
catalytic reactions. The catalytic reaction in the presence of
substrates could be quite different. In contrast to the conventional
simple scheme, in which compound I is the sole reactive
intermediate responsible for the oxidation reaction based on
direct and indirect evidence,7 recent studies suggest that the
actual reaction mechanism is a more complex one, as shown in
Scheme 1.8,9 Machii et al. demonstrated that the active species
responsible for the epoxidation is not always compound I in
catalytic epoxidation by synthetic iron porphyrins and also
showed that competitive epoxidation is a good indicator to
discriminate the active species.8a Nam et al. studied the
competitive epoxidation by synthetic iron porphyrins with
hydroperoxides or peracids and demonstrated that two inter-
mediates, 1 and 2 in Scheme 1, were both able to oxidize easily
oxidizable substrates such as alkenes and that the nature of the
reactive intermediates depended upon the rate of the O-O bond
cleavage of 1.8b Further, Nam et al. demonstrated that 1 could
oxidize even nonactivated alkanes to give alcohol products.9a
Collman et al. also provided evidence that the active intermedi-
ates in the oxidation reactions by iron porphyrins with iodos-
ylbenzene derivatives as oxygen donors are iron porphyrin-
oxidant complexes.9b In the case of P450 enzymes, site-specific
mutagenesis studies performed by Vaz et al. and Newcomb et
al. indicated that iron-hydroperoxide (1), iron-hydrogen
peroxide (protonated 1), and iron-oxo complex (2) all act as
electrophilic oxidants in alkene epoxidation and alkane hy-
droxylation.10
Figure 1. Structure of the SR Complex.
We synthesized the first synthetic heme-thiolate (SR
complex,12a Figure 1) that retains thiolate coordination during
catalytic oxidation and have found several remarkable thiolate
axial ligand effects.12a-c,13 In previous studies using SR, we
measured the rates of substrate oxidation by SR with several
alkyl hydroperoxides and found that the sixth thiolate ligand of
SR induces a 50-250-fold increase in the oxidation rates
compared with chloride ligand.12a We also examined the
degradation of terminal oxidant mediated by SR and found that
the thiolate ligand enhances the formation of the two-electron-
oxidized intermediate in high yield without the assistance of
acid or base.13 To assess the effect of thiolate ligand on the
oxidation reactivity, we examined the kinetic isotope effect and
18O incorporation from 18O-enriched oxidants in the O-de-
methylation reaction and examined the alkane oxidation rate/
alkene oxidation rate ratio in the competitive oxidations of
alkane and alkene catalyzed by SR, other synthetic iron-
porphyrins, and cytochrome P450s. From these studies, we have
established that the catalytic features of SR and P450s are very
similar and that the thiolate ligand has a marked influence on
the reactivity of the intermediate, although the electronic
structure of the reactive intermediate derived from SR remains
uncertain.12b,c
However, these previous studies using synthetic hemes were
carried out by use of nonthiolate synthetic hemes. Considering
that axial thiolate coordination is a key feature of cytochrome
P450 and that the axial ligand greatly affects both the reactivity
of heme enzyme11 and that of synthetic heme,12 thiolate-ligated
iron porphyrin would be clearly preferable as a model for
reaction mechanism analysis relevant to P450. While Vaz et
al. and Newcomb et al. obtained interesting results by using
P450 enzymes and their mutants, synthetic model studies with
thiolate-ligated iron porphyrin would be of value because one
can chose various oxidants, substrates, and reaction conditions
such as temperature, polarity of solvent, and so on, as required
for analysis of each reaction.
Now in the present study, we have carried out reaction
analysis by use of SR with various oxidants and substrates in
order to throw light on the nature of the reactive intermediate
derived from SR that is truly responsible for the oxygen atom
transfer reaction in catalytic oxidation.
Experimental Section
Materials. CH2Cl2 was distilled from CaH2 before use. Peroxy-
phenylacetic acid and other substituted peroxybenzoic acids were
prepared by a literature method14 and purified by washing with 200
mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH ) 6.5) and recrystallization from
hexane. SR complex and Fe(TMP)Cl (5,10,15,20-tetramesitylpor-
phyrinate iron(III) chloride) were prepared by a method reported
previously.12,15,16 Fe(TPFPP)Cl [5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophen-
yl)porphyrinate iron(III) chloride] was purchased from Aldrich Chemi-
cal Co. and used without further purification. TBPH (2,4,6-tri-tert-
butylphenol) was purchased from Tokyo Kasei and purified by silica
gel column chromatography and recrystallization from EtOH-H2O.
Cyclooctane and cyclooctene were purchased from Tokyo Kasei and
distilled from CaH2 before use.
(7) (a) Nam, W.; Goh, Y. M.; Lee, Y. J.; Lim, M. H.; Kim, C. Inorg. Chem.
1999, 38, 3238. (b) Bernadou, J.; Meunier, B. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2167.
(c) Lee, K. A.; Nam, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1916. (d) Bernadou,
J.; Fabiano, A. S.; Robert, A.; Meunier, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
9375.
(8) (a) Machii, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Morishima, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
6691. (b) Nam, W.; Lim, M. H.; Lee, H. J.; Kim, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 6641. (c) Kamaraj, K.; Bandyopadhyay, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 8099.
(9) (a) Nam, W.; Lim, M. H.; Moon, S. K.; Kim, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 10805. (b) Collman, J. P.; Chien, A. S.; Eberspacher, T. A.; Brauman,
J. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11098.
(10) (a) Vaz, A. D. N.; McGinnity, D. F.; Coon, M. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1998, 95, 3555. (b) Vaz, A. D. N.; Pernecky, S. J.; Raner, G. M.;
Coon, M. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 4644. (c) Newcomb,
M.; Shen, R.; Choi, S.-Y.; Toy, P. H.; Hollenberg, P. F.; Vaz, A. D. N.;
Coon, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2677. (d) Toy, P. H.; Newcomb,
M.; Coon, M. J.; Vaz, A. D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9718.
(11) (a) Sigman, J. A.; Pond, A. E.; Dawson, J. H.; Lu, Y. Biochemistry 1999,
38, 11122. (b) Raphael, A. L.; Gray, H. B.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
1038. (c) Matsui, T.; Nagano, S.; Ishimori, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Morishima,
I. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 13118.
(12) (a) Higuchi, T.; Uzu, S.; Hirobe, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7051.
(b) Ohno, T.; Suzuki, N.; Dokoh, T.; Urano, Y.; Kikuchi, K.; Hirobe, M.;
Higuchi, T.; Nagano, T, J. Inorg. Biochem. 2000, 82, 123. (c) Urano, Y.;
Higuchi, T.; Hirobe, M.; Nagano, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12008.
(d) Nam, W.; Lim, M.; Oh, S. Y.; Lee, J. H.; Lee, H. J.; Woo, S. K.; Kim,
C.; Shin, W. Angew. Chem. 2000, 39, 3646.
Instruments. GC/SIM (gas chromatography/selected ion monitoring)
analyses were performed on a Hewlett-Packard 5890 Series II gas
(13) Higuchi, T.; Shimada, K.; Maruyama, N.; Hirobe, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 7551.
(14) Ogata, Y.; Sawaki, Y. Tetrahedron 1967, 23, 3327.
(15) Lindsey, L. S.; Wagner, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 828.
(16) Kobayashi, H.; Higuchi, T.; Kaizu, Y.; Osada, H.; Aoki, M. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1975, 48, 3137.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 32, 2002 9623