ChemComm
Communication
The formation of benzoin (16) from benzil (17) in the absence of O2
(but presence of CH3OH) also requires explanation: we would suggest
that – by analogy with a recent proposal10 in a distinct but related
transformation – attack by the enaminol 23 on diketone 17 would yield
27 (isolated by Massi et al.10). In the presence of excess base and
methanol, the cleavage of 27 to yield ester 19 and 16 via hemiacetal 28
is conceivable. This model was supported by the inefficiency of the
corresponding amidation chemistry (Scheme 6) involving pyrrolidine –
a more nucleophilic but less acidic reagent than MeOH.
We suggest that this may be related to the attack of the more
hindered amine on the very bulky ketone 25. This reaction
would also be hampered by considerably less efficient general
base catalysis of the attack on the ketone involving the con-
siderably less acidic amine.
In summary these reactions have been shown to be mechan-
istically distinct from other either NHC-catalysed ‘oxidative’ or
‘oxygenative’ esterifications in that the species which reacts with
oxygen in the air is not the Breslow intermediate, but the aryloin
(or more accurately, its enolate). In aqueous solvent benzoic acid
(10) is accessible from aldehyde 1 in excellent yield. Investigations
to further develop the scope and utility of these reactions are
underway. Financial support from the IRCSET, Science Founda-
tion Ireland and the DFG is gratefully acknowledged.
Fig. 2 Mechanistic rationale: all highlighted compounds have been either
isolated and/or detected in situ.
product (Scheme 5A; only low levels of acid 10 and aldehyde 1). The
use of ethanol as a co-solvent also diverted the process towards the
generation of ester 20 (Scheme 5B), however, acid formation was
more favourable here (together with of small amounts of aldehyde 1
and benzoin 16). In aqueous isopropanol conversion is incomplete.
No esterification occurs: oxidation to 10 and reversion to aldehyde 1
are the major fates of 17 (Scheme 5C). It appears that the factors
which govern selectivity in these processes are not simply related to
either acidity or steric bulk, but a confluence of factors: a weak
correlation between acidity and propensity for ester formation was
found, while the outcome of the experiment involving isopropanol is
difficult to rationalise based on its pKa alone.13
Overall, a mechanistic rationale consistent with the data outlined
above is shown in Fig. 2. The carbene 22 reacts with 1 to form the
enaminol 23, which, on addition to another molecule of 1 results in the
rapid formation of 16 (also see Scheme 2), which is oxidised by air in
the presence of base to benzil (17).14 Since our results are not consistent
with acyl azolium ion formation, we would propose that the electro-
philic diketone 17 is attacked by NHC 22 to give the tetrahedral
intermediate 25, which is converted to 26 (presumably via intra-
molecular general base catalysis – also see Scheme 2). The hemiacetal
26 (ref. 15) can then collapse to reform the enaminol 23 and methyl
benzoate 19. The formation of the hindered hemiacetal 26 would be
likely to depend on both the steric bulk and the pKa of the alcohol. In
the absence of added alcohol, it is possible that a similar process occurs
involving 16 as the nucleophile, which affords the hydroacylation
product 18. In the presence of MeOH 18 is converted to 16 via 24
(also see eqn (2)).16
Notes and references
1 E. G. Delany, C.-L. Fagan, S. Gundala, A. Mari, T. Broja, K. Zeitler
and S. J. Connon, DOI: 10.1039/c3cc42596g.
2 (a) W. Yang, G.-Z. Gou, Y. Wang and W.-F. Fu, RSC Adv., 2013,
3, 6334; (b) M. Yoshida, Y. Katagiri, W.-B. Zhu and K. Shishido, Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 4062.
3 C. E. I. Knappke, A. Imami and A. J. von Wangelin, ChemCatChem,
2012, 4, 937.
4 C. Noonan, L. Baragwanath and S. J. Connon, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2008, 49, 4003.
5 (a) J. L. Ihrig and R. G. Caldwell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1956, 78, 2097;
(b) T. C. Bruice and J. P. Taulane, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98, 7769.
6 (a) L. Baragwanath, C. A. Rose, K. Zeitler and S. J. Connon, J. Org.
Chem., 2009, 74, 9214; (b) S. E. O’Toole and S. J. Connon, Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 3584; (c) S. E. O’Toole, C. A. Rose,
S. Gundala, K. Zeitler and S. J. Connon, J. Org. Chem., 2011,
76, 347; (d) C. A. Rose, S. Gundala, S. J. Connon and K. Zeitler,
Synthesis, 2011, 190; (e) C. A. Rose, S. Gundala, C.-L. Fagan,
J. F. Franz, S. J. Connon and K. Zeitler, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 735.
7 Quoted yields within the figures are determined by 1H NMR spectro-
scopy with an internal standard. See the ESI† for details.
8 A. Chan and K. A. Scheidt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 4558.
9 This process features a comparison of reactions of different mole-
cularity; therefore (to avoid confusion), we have quote the yields as
mmol of product.
10 It is noteworthy that Massi et al. have recently observed the benzoyla-
tion of PEG400 on treatment of benzil with a thiazolium ion-derived
NHC, see: O. Bortolini, G. Fantin, M. Fogagnolo, P. P. Giovannini,
V. Venturi, S. Pacifico and A. Massi, Tetrahedron, 2011, 67, 8110.
11 It must be acknowledged that reversion of 16 to 1, followed by a
hydroacylation reaction as proposed by Scheidt (see Scheme 2)
cannot be ruled out at this juncture.
12 For use of an unsymmetrical benzil, see the ESI†.
13 It is noteworthy that in mixtures with MeCN, MeOH has been found
to be more nucleophilic than EtOH: (a) S. Minegishi, S. Kobayashi
and H. Mayr, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 5174; (b) T. B. Phan and
H. Mayr, Can. J. Chem., 2005, 83, 1554.
14 In a control experiment under standard aerobic conditions in the
absence of 2, 16 (1.0 mmol) was converted to 17 (0.19 mmol) after
just one 1 h reaction time.
15 We note that a similar intermediate has been suggested (in a different
process) by Massi et al., see ref. 10.
16 This process occurs in both the presence and absence of 2.
Scheme 6 The NHC-mediated oxidative amidation of 1.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun.