Y. Yang et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 381 (2010) 274–281
275
stability and allow for catalyst recycling and product separation.
Conventionally, the Schiff base complexes are immobilized on poly-
meric organic materials such as resins, or polystyrene [21], then
supported on inert porous solid such as alumina [22] and silica or
encapsulated in the pores of zeolite-Y [23]. There are certain dis-
advantages with polymeric supports due to their vulnerability to
some chemicals and solvents. Encapsulation of metal complexes
in porous materials typified by zeolites leads to size restriction
and severe leaching of catalysts. Mesoporous silica materials have
been widely used as useful and versatile solid supports to construct
various hybrid materials in catalysis, enzyme immobilization and
drug delivery due to their large tunable pore dimensions, high sur-
face areas and great diversity in surface functionalization [24,25].
Therefore, covalent anchoring of the Schiff base complexes onto
a functionalized siliceous mesoporous material with large pore
diameters seems to be promising. The mesoporous SBA-15 materi-
als are more versatile than other mesoporous supports because of
their larger pore diameter permitting easy diffusion of bulky reac-
tants and products during the liquid-phase oxidation of styrene.
Herein, we report the immobilization of functionalized Cu(II)
and VO(IV) Schiff base complexes bearing chloromethyl groups
onto amino-modified SBA-15 materials and their catalytic prop-
erties in styrene oxidation. The catalytic performances of both
heterogeneous copper(II) and oxovanadium(IV) catalysts were
compared to those of their homogeneous analogues and the oxi-
in petroleum ether. The extract furnished 5-chloromethyl-2-
hydroxybenzaldehyde as white-colored needles (9.0 g, 32.0%
yield). Found: C, 57.57; H, 4.12%. Calc. for C H7O Cl: C, 56.30; H,
8
2
−
1
4.10%. FT-IR (KBr pellets, cm ): 3240 (OH), 2925, 2873 (Aliph-H),
1659 (C=O), 1260 (CH Cl), 772 (C–Cl) (Supplementary Fig. S1).
2
1
UV–vis, ꢀ (nm): 224, 257, 332. H NMR (CDCl , TMS, ı ppm): 11.07
3
(1H, s, OH), 9.90 (1H, s, CHO), 7.59 (1H, s, Ar–H), 7.26–7.19 (1H, d,
Ar–H), 7.02–6.08 (1H, d, Ar–H), 4.59 (1H, s, CH Cl) (Supplementary
2
Fig. S2).
2.2.3. Synthesis of
ꢀ
N,N -bis(5-chloromethyl-salicylidene)ethylenediamine
(CM–SalenH ) and its metal complexes
2
3.41 g (20.0 mmol) of 5-chloromethyl-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde
was dissolved in 10 ml of CH Cl . A solution of ethylene diamine
2
2
(0.67 ml, 10 mmol) in 10 ml of CH Cl2 was then added. The result-
2
ing solution was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. After the
solvent was removed under vacuum, the product was obtained
as bright yellow crystals. Found: C, 58.50; H, 5.10; N, 7.86%. Cal.
for C18
H N O Cl : C, 59.20; H, 4.90; N, 7.70%. FT-IR (KBr pel-
18 2 2 2
−
1
lets, cm ): 3423 (OH), 2929, 2887 (Aliph-H), 1647 (C=N), 1262
1
(CH Cl), 769 (C–Cl). UV–vis, ꢀ (nm): 252, 340, 381. H NMR (DMSO-
2
d6, TMS, ı ppm): 11.12 (2H, s, OH), 7.83–6.98 (6H, m, Ar–H), 8.40,
8.44 (2H, s, CH=N), 4.44 (4H, s, CH Cl), 3.48–3.38, 3.19–3.10 (4H, t,
2
N–CH –CH –N) (Supplementary Fig. S3).
2
2
dation performances using air and H O2 as oxidizing agent were
To prepare the metal complexes of CM–SalenH , we dissolved
2
2
also compared.
0.367 g of CM–SalenH2 (1 mmol) and 1 mmol of Cu(CH COO)2 or
3
VOSO4 in 20 ml THF under N2 atmosphere and we stirred the mix-
ture at room temperature for 24 h. The solvent was removed by
filtration, and the resulting solid was washed with copious tetrahy-
drofuran and dried in vacuum. Found for Cu–CM–Salen: C, 50.50;
2
. Experimental
2.1. Materials
H, 3.82; N, 6.32; Cu, 13.50%. Calc. for C18H16N O Cl Cu: C, 50.61; H,
2
−
2
1
2
The following chemicals were commercially available and were
3.75; N, 6.56; Cu, 14.88%. FT-IR (KBr pellets, cm ): 3423 (OH), 2929,
2887 (Aliph-H), 1621 (C=N), 767 (C–Cl), 526 (Cu–O), 470 (Cu–N).
UV–vis, ꢀ (nm): 240, 345, 389, 572. Found for VO–CM–Salen: C,
49.92; H, 3.63; N, 6.42; V, 11.50%. Calc. for C18H16N2O3Cl2V: C,
50.20; H, 3.72; N, 6.51; V, 11.84%. FT-IR (KBr pellets, cm ): 3423
(OH), 2929, 2887 (Aliph-H), 1631 (C=N), 769 (C–Cl), 976 (V=O), 534
(V–O), 456 (V–N). UV–vis, ꢀ (nm): 263, 323, 379, 554.
used as received: 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (Aldrich), Pluronic
P123 (EO20PO70EO20) (Aldrich), salicylaldehyde (99%), tetraethyl
orthosilicate Si(OC H5)4 (99%), styrene (98%). 30% H O , VOSO ,
2
2
2
4
−
1
Cu(CH COO) and all organic solvents are A.R. grade. Toluene was
3
2
dried by Na/diphenylketone ketyl and distilled under N2 atmo-
sphere. All air or moisture-sensitive compounds were transferred
using a standard vacuum line and the Schlenk technique.
2.2.4. Immobilization of Cu–CM–Salen and VO–CM–Salen on
2.2. Synthetic procedures (Scheme 1)
amino-functionalized mesoporous SBA-15
Metal Schiff base complexes were anchored onto SBA-15 matrix
based on the nucleophilic reaction between the chloromethyl
modified metal complexes and the aminopropyl-functionalized
SBA-15. A known amount of Cu–CM–Salen (0.33 g, 0.8 mmol) or
VO–CM–Salen (0.32 g, 0.8 mmol) was added to a suspension of the
amino-functionalized SBA-15 (1.0 g) in dry toluene and stirred at
reflux temperature for 24 h. The resulting samples were filtered
off, Soxhlet-extracted with CH2Cl2 to remove untethered species
2
.2.1. Synthesis of amino-functionalized SBA-15
The mesoporous support SBA-15 (1.0 g), prepared by a lit-
◦
erature method [26], was activated by heating at 120 C for
2
aminopropyltriethoxysilane (1.6 mmol in 20 ml of dry toluene)
under N2 atmosphere and the mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 24 h. The resulting solid was filtered, washed,
Soxhlet-extracted with CH Cl2 for 24 h and dried under vacuum.
Found for APS–SBA-15: C, 5.37; H, 1.41; N, 1.39%. FT-IR (KBr pel-
lets, cm ): 1510 (NH ), 1000–1130 (Si–O–Si), 960 (Si–OH), 687
h. After cooling, the activated SBA-15 was added to the 3-
−
1
and dried in vacuum. Cu–Salen–SBA, FT-IR (KBr pellets, cm ):
3413 (OH), 3236 (N–H), 2926 (Aliph-H), 1636 (C=N), 1087, 808, 468
(Si–O–Si). UV–vis, ꢀ (nm): 265, 349, 380, 576. VO–Salen–SBA, FT-IR
2
−
1
2
−
1
(
N–H).
(KBr pellets, cm ): 3407 (OH), 3220 (N–H), 2931 (Aliph-H), 1629
C=N), 1086, 804, 464 (Si–O–Si). UV–vis, ꢀ (nm): 243, 325, 389.
(
2.2.2. Synthesis of 5-chloromethyl-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde
5
-Chloromethyl-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde was synthesized
2.3. Characterization
from salicylaldehyde by the classical chloromethylation method.
In a typical synthesis, 17.5 g (160 mmol) of salicylaldehyde was
treated with 24 ml of 38% aqueous formaldehyde and 1.2 g of
ZnCl2 in 100 ml of con. HCl. The mixture was stirred at room
temperature under N2 atmosphere for 24 h. The resulting white
solid was filtered and repeatedly extracted with diethyl ether. The
combined organic phases were washed with saturated aqueous
Powder XRD was collected with a Rigaku X-ray diffractome-
ter with nickel filtered CuK␣ radiation (ꢀ = 1.5418 Å). The samples
◦
◦
◦
were scanned in the range 2ꢁ = 0.4–5.0 and in steps of 2 /min. N
2
adsorption/desorption isotherms were recorded at 196 C with a
Micromeritics ASAP 2020. Before measurements, the samples were
outgassed at 120 C for 12 h. The specific surface area was calculated
◦
NaHCO3 and water and then dried over MgSO . The viscous oil
was obtained by distillation and then subjected to crystallization
using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method and the pore size
distributions were measured using Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH)
4