H. Wang et al. / Journal of Catalysis 275 (2010) 140–148
147
Table 5
eight consecutive reactions for two model reactions. The as-syn-
thesized mesostructured materials have a great advantage as the
support of the noble metal nanoparticles, because they can be used
as support directly, without further calcination or modification.
Due to the facile preparation process and high catalytic perfor-
mance, the hybrid catalysts would be promising in practical appli-
cations at relative low temperature.
Weight loss by TG and Pd content of 1.0%Pd/as-M41 catalysts before and after
reaction.
Loss of mass (%)a
Pd (%)b
Pd(%)-SiO2
c
Entry
Catalyst
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.0%Pd/as-M41
35.8
30.7
27.3
33.3
22.2
21.4
1.09
1.18
1.22
1.12
1.34
1.37
1.70
1.70
1.68
1.68
1.72
1.74
1.0%Pd/as-M41-H-4d
1.0%Pd/as-M41-H-8
1.0%Pd/as-M41-O-1e
1.0%Pd/as-M41-O-4
1.0%Pd/as-M41-O-8
Acknowledgments
a
b
c
Weight loss from TG curve between 150–600 °C.
Pd weight percent in the catalyst detected by ICP measurement.
Calculated Pd weight percent in the catalyst by deduction of the weight loss of
This work was supported by NSFC (20873070, 20973095),
National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB623502), RFDP
(200800550007), NCET of Ministry of Education (NCET-07-0448)
and MOE (IRT-0927).
the organic species. The oxidation of Pd and dehydroxylation of the silica during the
TG measurements were not taken into account.
d
H-n: the catalyst was reused in hydrogenation of allyl alcohol for n times.
O-n: the catalyst was reused in aerobic oxidation of benzyl alcohol for n times.
e
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
the surfactants. For easy comparison, the Pd content was calibrated
by deduction of the weight loss of the organic species, and the cal-
culated Pd content values were listed in Table 5. It could be clearly
found that the Pd content in the reused catalysts remained un-
changed within experimental error, indicating that there was al-
most no Pd leaching in the reaction system even after repeated
uses. This point was in good agreement with the experiment, i.e.,
when extra allyl alcohol (10 mmol) was added into the filtrate after
extraction of the catalyst, no further conversion occurred after
45 min at the same reaction condition as was detected by GC. This
indicated that no observable leaching of the Pd nanoparticles into
the solution during the reaction.
References
[1] J.M. Campelo, D. Luna, R. Luque, J.M. Marinas, A.A. Romero, ChemSusChem 2
(2009) 18.
[2] R.J. White, R. Luque, V.L. Budarin, J.H. Clark, D.J. Macquarrie, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38
(2009) 481.
[3] A. Taguchi, F. Schueth, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 77 (2005) 1.
[4] X. Chen, H.Y. Zhu, J.C. Zhao, Z.F. Zheng, X.P. Gao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47
(2008) 5353.
[5] A. Fukuoka, H. Araki, J. Kimura, Y. Sakamoto, T. Higuchi, N. Sugimoto, S. Inagaki,
M. Ichikawa, J. Mater. Chem. 14 (2004) 752.
[6] P. Haider, A. Baiker, J. Catal. 248 (2007) 175.
As discussed above, in the Pd/as-M41 the Pd nanoparticles were
stabilized by the CTA+ surfactants. The gradual loss of the surfac-
tants during the catalytic reactions would probably result in the
partial leaching of the Pd nanoparticles; however, the Pd content
in the catalyst remained unchanged. To explain this point, the
black solution of CTAB-stabilized Pd nanoparticles was prepared
as described previously. When proper amount of as-M41 (corre-
sponding to 1 wt% Pd loading) was added in the solution, it was
found that the CTAB-stabilized Pd nanoparticles were adsorbed
by as-M41, and the black solution became colorless (Fig. S4 in Sup-
porting Information). This implies though some Pd nanoparticles
could be leached together with the surfactants from the Pd/as-
M41 during the catalytic reactions, those disassociated surfac-
tant-stabilized Pd nanoparticles in the reaction solvent could be
adsorbed back by the catalyst, while the extracted surfactants were
irreversibly lost. This could explain why the loss of the surfactants
would not influence the stability of the Pd nanoparticles in the
catalyst.
[7] U. Junges, W. Jacobs, I. Voigt-Martin, B. Krutzschc, F. Schueth, J. Chem. Soc.
Chem. Commun. (1995) 2283.
[8] P. Krawiec, E. Kockrick, P. Simon, G. Auffermann, S. Kaskel, Chem. Mater. 18
(2006) 2663.
[9] A.K. Prashar, R.P. Hodgkins, R. Kumar, R.N. Devi, J. Mater. Chem. 18 (2008)
1765.
[10] P. Serp, P. Kalck, R. Feurer, Chem. Rev. 102 (2002) 3085.
[11] T. Ishida, M. Nagaoka, T. Akita, M. Haruta, Chem. Eur. J. 14 (2008) 8456.
[12] J. Sun, D. Ma, H. Zhang, X. Liu, X. Han, X. Bao, G. Weinberg, N. Pfander, D. Su, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 15756.
[13] C. Yang, H. Shen, K. Chao, Adv. Funct. Mater. 12 (2002) 143.
[14] L. Li, J.L. Shi, L.X. Zhang, L.M. Xiong, J.N. Yan, Adv. Mater. 16 (2004) 1079.
[15] C. Wang, G. Zhu, J. Li, X. Cai, Y. Wei, D. Zhang, S. Qiu, Chem. Eur. J. 11 (2005)
4975.
[16] M.P. Mokhonoana, N.J. Coville, A.K. Datye, Catal. Lett. 135 (2010) 1.
[17] H. Lee, S.E. Habas, S. Kweskin, D. Butcher, G.A. Somorjai, P. Yang, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 45 (2006) 7824.
[18] T.K. Sau, C.J. Murphy, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 8648.
[19] H. Wang, S. Deng, Z. Shen, J. Wang, D. Ding, T. Chen, Green Chem. 11 (2009)
1499.
[20] L. Martins, W. Holderich, P. Hammer, D. Cardoso, J. Catal. 271 (2010) 220.
[21] Y. Kubota, H. Ikeya, Y. Sugi, T. Yamada, T. Tatsumi, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 249
(2006) 181.
[22] Y. Kubota, Y. Nishizaki, H. Ikeya, M. Saeki, T. Hida, S. Kawazu, M. Yoshida, H.
Fujii, Y. Sugi, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 70 (2004) 135.
[23] A.C. Oliveira, L. Martins, D. Cardoso, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 120 (2009)
206.
4. Conclusions
[24] L. Martins, D. Cardoso, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 106 (2007) 8.
[25] L. Martins, T.J. Bonagamba, E.R. Azevedo, P. Bargiela, D. Cardoso, Appl. Catal. A:
Gen. 312 (2006) 77.
[26] T. Jiang, Q. Zhao, M. Li, H. Yin, J. Hazar. Mater. 159 (2008) 204.
[27] A. Bhaumik, S. Inagaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 691.
[28] A.H. Lu, W.C. Li, Z. Hou, F. Schuth, Chem. Commun. (2007) 1038.
[29] A.K. Prashar, R.P. Hodgkins, J.N. Chandran, P.R. Rajamohanan, R.N. Devi, Chem.
Mater. 22 (2010) 1633.
[30] R. Xing, Y. Liu, H. Wu, X. Li, M. He, P. Wu, Chem. Commun. (2008) 6297.
[31] B. Karimi, A. Zamani, S. Abedi, J.H. Clark, Green Chem. 11 (2009) 109.
[32] T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 3037.
[33] K. Mori, K. Yamaguchi, T. Hara, T. Mizugaki, K. Ebitani, K. Kaneda, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 124 (2002) 11572.
In summary, a facile method was presented to prepare sup-
ported noble metal catalysts by using as-synthesized mesostruc-
tured materials as the host. Other than the role of templating for
mesopores, the surfactants played a new role of capturing and sta-
bilizing agents to prepare supported noble metal nanoparticles.
The specific interaction between the alkylammonium surfactants
and PdCl24ꢀ at room temperature offered an easy control of Pd load-
ings. The Pd/as-M41 catalyst exhibited higher catalytic activity in
hydrogenation of allyl alcohol and aerobic oxidation of benzyl alco-
hol reactions than that of the amino-functionalized MCM-41 sup-
ported Pd catalyst. Partial leaching of surfactants was observed in
the recycling uses of the catalyst. However, the catalyst still
showed high activity because no obvious leaching of Pd was ob-
served in the process. The result was confirmed by the recycling
uses of the catalyst, which exhibited stable catalytic activity in
[34] K. Mori, T. Hara, T. Mizugaki, K. Ebitani, K. Kaneda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126
(2004) 10657.
[35] D.I. Enache, J.K. Edwards, P. Landon, B.S. Espriu, A.F. Carley, A.A. Herzing, M.
Watanabe, C.J. Kiely, D.W. Knight, G.J. Hutching, Science 311 (2006) 362.
[36] N. Dimitratos, J.A. Lopez-Sanchez, D. Morgan, A.F. Carley, R. Tiruvalam, C.J.
Kiely, D. Bethell, G.J. Hutchings, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11 (2009) 5142.
[37] N. Dimitratos, A. Villa, D. Wang, F. Porta, D. Su, L. Prati, J. Catal. 244 (2010) 113.