P. Rudrapaul et al. / Phytochemistry Letters 9 (2014) 7–10
9
Fig. 2. Selected NOESY correlations of 1.
Fig. 3. Selected NOESY correlations of 2.
Compound (2) named meyanthic acid, was isolated as colorless
powder. Its molecular formula was determined as C32H50O7 from
its quasi-molecular ion peaks at m/z 547.3632 [M+H]+ (Calcd for
C32H51O7, 547.3635) and 569.3450 [M+Na]+ (Calcd for C32H50O7Na,
569.3454) and 13C-DEPT NMR spectral data. Its IR spectrum
showed the presence of hydroxyl (3467 cmꢀ1), ester (1732 cmꢀ1),
carboxyl (1692 cmꢀ1) and olefinic (1639 cmꢀ1) functionalities. The
1H-NMR spectral data (Table 1) showed five tertiary methyl
br s), 1.58 (2H, quint), 1.62 (2H, quint), 2.32 (2H, t, J = 6.8 Hz), 4.05
(2H, t, J = 6.8 Hz), attributable for a long linear aliphatic ester chain.
The 13C-NMR spectrum with DEPT experiments showed carbon
signals at dC 14.1 (CH3), 22.7 (CH2), 25.7 (CH2), 29.2 ꢀ 29.7 (CH2),
32.8 (CH2), 63.1 (CH2) and 174.6 (C) also corroborating its long
chain saturated fatty acid ester structure. The acid moiety was
assigned as pentadecanoic acid from the presence of a strong
fragment ion at m/z 243 in its FAB-MS due to McLafferty cleavage.
Its saponification with 1 N methanolic KOH under N2 atmosphere
gave myricyl alcohol (1-triacontanol), CH3(CH2)29OH and penta-
decanoic acid, CH3-(CH2)13-COOH (Dinda et al., 1999). Based on
this evidence, compound 3 was identified as myricyl-1-pentade-
canoate (Fig. 1). It was isolated for the first time from nature.
It may be noted that although we have isolated oleanolic acid
from this plant but failed to isolate its saponin. Possibly saponins
may be present in the polar butanol fraction, work on this fraction
is in process. The plants of family Rubiaceae contain both
oleananes and ursanes (Zhao et al., 1995, 1996).
singlets (
1.12, d, J = 6.0 Hz), one trisubstituted olefinic proton (
and one methine proton ( 3.06, s), characteristic of 19
hydroxyurs-12-ene type triterpenoid (Cheng and Cao, 1992).
The signals of two methine protons [ 5.06 (1H, br s) and 4.27 (1H,
ddd, J = 4.2, 4.0, 2.4 Hz)], a hydroxymethyl signal [ 3.74 (1H, d,
d
1.09, 1.11, 1.15, 1.43 and 1.67), one secondary methyl (
d
d
5.60, t-like)
d
a-
d
d
J = 10.2 Hz) and 4.22 (1H, d, J = 10.2 Hz)] and one acetoxymethyl
(3H, s, 2.05) in the 1H-NMR spectrum indicated the presence of two
hydroxyl groups and one acetoxy group in ring A (Kojima and
Ogura, 1989; Cheng and Cao, 1992). The location of the acetoxy
group at C-3 position was suggested by the downfield shift of H-3
(
d
5.06) and the location of the hydroxyl group at C-23 position was
Studies on the evaluation of bioefficacy of the isolated
chemicals in bone fracture, renal disorders and others will be
carried out after isolation of sufficient amount of the compounds
from these fractions of medium polarity as well as from butanol
fraction.
deduced by the chemical shifts of C-23 and C-24 (Table 1) (Mahato
and Kundu, 1994). The 13C-NMR spectral data (Table 1) recorded
32 carbon signals consisting of seven methyl, nine methylene,
seven methine and nine quaternary carbons. The presence of two
olefinic carbons (
73.0), one methylene carbon (
carbons ( 69.2, 78.6), a methyl carbon (
181.0) and carbons of an acetoxy group (
d
128.3 and 140.3), one quaternary carbon (
66.6), two hydroxymethine
14.7), a carboxyl carbon
21.7 and 170.2) also
d
d
3. Experimental
d
d
(
d
d
3.1. General experiment
corroborated its 3-acetoxy,2,19,23-trihydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic
acid-like structure for it (Zhou et al., 1992). The HMBC correlation
of H-18 with dC at 73.0 confirmed the location of one hydroxyl
group at C-19 position. Similarly, HMBC correlation of H-1 with dC
at 69.2 and of H-2 with dC at 78.6 and of H-3 with dC at 66.6
supported the position of hydroxyl group at C-2, acetoxy group at
C-3 and hydroxyl group at C-23. HMBC correlation of H-18 with dC
181.0 confirmed the location of carboxyl group at 28 position. The
signal of H-2 was observed as a doublet of double doublet with the
coupling constants of 4.2, 4.0 and 2.4 Hz, for one diequatorial and
Melting points were determined on a Ko¨fler block type
apparatus. The IR spectra were measured on a Perkin Elmer
FTIR-100 spectrometer. NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker
Avance DRX-600 and DRX-400 spectrometers operating at 600 and
400 MHz for 1H-NMR, and 150 and 100 MHz for 13C-NMR. EI, HR-
FAB and FAB-MS were recorded on
a JEOL JMS-303 mass
spectrometer. Optical rotation was measured on a Perkin Elmer
digital polarimeter. Column chromatography (CC) was performed
with silica gel (60–120 mesh, Merck, India) and TLC with silica gel
G (Merck, India).
two axial-equatorial couplings, characteristic for 2b, 3b-dihy-
droxyurs-12-en-28-oates (Kojima and Ogura, 1989). The NOESY
correlations between H-3 and H-23, H-2, H-1 supported the
3.2. Plant material
stereochemical assignment of 3
groups. Similarly, the NOESY relations between H-18 and H-29 and
H-20 confirmed the -configuration of hydroxyl group at C-19
position(Fig. 3). Thus, the structure of meyanthic acid 2 was
b-acetoxy, 2b and 23-dihydroxyl
The leaves of M. spinosa Roxb. were collected from Dharma-
nagar, North Tripura in June 2011. The plant was identified by Prof.
B.K. Datta, Taxonomist, Department of Botany, Tripura University.
A voucher specimen (TU/H/1535) was deposited in the laboratory
of B.K.D.
a
elucidated as 3b-acetoxy,2b,19a,23-trihydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic
acid (Fig.1).
Compound 3 was isolated as colorless amorphous powder. Its
molecular formula was assigned as C45H90O2 from the quasi-
molecular ion peak at m/z 663.7022 [M+H]+ (Calcd for C45H91O2,
663.7019) in HR-FAB-MS. Its IR spectrum revealed the presence of
an ester (1740 cmꢀ1) function. Its 1H-NMR spectrum showed
3.3. Extraction and isolation
Air-dried leaves (2 kg) of M. spinosa were extracted with
methanol by maceration at room temperature (6 L ꢁ 2, 6 d each
time) and the methanolic extract was concentrated in vacuo using a
proton signals at dH 0.84 (3H, t), 0.88 (3H, t, J = 6.6 Hz), 1.26 (76H,