Disproportionation of Hydroxylamine
A R T I C L E S
was also supplied with an absolute pressure transducer, MKS Baratron
622 A, and with a mechanical stirrer. The pH was controlled with a
Hanna HI9321 pHmeter, calibrated against Merck standard buffers. The
NMR studies (15N) were performed in a Bruker 500 MHz instrument,
using Ar-flushed solutions of Na3[Fe(CN)5NH3]‚3H2O in D2O (ca. 0.06
M, pH 9), after adding a great excess of 15NH2OH. IR spectra were
obtained using either a Thermo Mattson (model Genesis II) or a Nicolet
510P FTIR instrument. Resonance Raman spectra were measured with
the 457.9-nm excitation line of an Ar+-laser (Coherent Innova 400)
using an U1000, ISA spectrograph equipped with a liquid nitrogen
cooled CCD camera. The spectral resolution was 4 cm-1, and the step
width (increment per data point) was 0.53 cm-1. Accumulation times
of the spectra were 15 s. The samples were placed in a rotating cell to
avoid photodamage by the incident beam (power of ca. 30 mW). Phenol
was determined with a Konic HPLC instrument model KNK-500-A
containing a UV-vis detector.
Slow disproportionation of NH2OH in alkaline solutions gives
NH3 and N2/N2O mixtures.9 These processes are also apparent
in the reactions of NH2OH with iron porphyrins and bacteria.5f,10
It has been suggested that this reaction type only occurs in the
presence of metal ion catalysts, involving coordination of NH2-
OH to the metal.11 In general, the redox properties of coordinated
NH2OH as compared to the free ligand have not been studied
in great detail.8
We focus on the reactivity of NH2OH bound to the
[FeII(CN)5]3- fragment.12 The pentacyano(L)ferrate(II) com-
plexes are well characterized systems, and many L ligands form
moderate to strong stable complexes (Kst ) ca. 103-105 M-1).
In many cases, the pentacyano(L)ferrate(III) derivatives have
been also characterized.13 The potential for the Fe(III),Fe(II)
couple to catalyze ligand redox is intriguing. Reactive inter-
mediates may be stabilized by the [FeII(CN)5]3- fragment during
these redox processes.14 The catalytic disproportionation of NH2-
OH using nitroprusside (NP) has been considered,15,16 but the
mechanistic proposal admits a significant revision, as will be
shown here. Our main goal is to investigate the mechanism of
the catalytic disproportionation reaction(s) of NH2OH in anaero-
bic medium, with an eye toward characterizing its coordination
Procedures and Identification of Reactants and Products. At pH’s
6-8, the dissociation of NH3 from the [Fe(CN)5NH3]3- ion (λmax
)
396 nm, ꢀ ) 450 M-1 cm-1) yields quantitatively the [Fe(CN)5H2O]3-
ion in a few minutes (λmax ) 444 nm, ꢀ ) 660 M-1 cm-1).18 This
species decays slowly through a decomposition process leading to the
[Fe(CN)6]4- and Fe2+ ions by way of successive release and recombina-
tion of cyanides (t1/2 ) ca. 2 h).19 Thus, it is sufficiently long-lived,
relative to the time scale of the main reactions under study, to trap the
free ligands present in the solutions. We checked spectroscopically on
these dissociation-decomposition processes, to put them under control
in our reaction conditions, including the absence of perturbations
associated with oxygen leakage. Due to the possible catalytic role of
the ferrous ions, we verified that the distribution of products in the
experiments to be described below did not change by adding a great
excess of EDTA as a potential scavenger.18,20
ability to the iron center. We address the conditions favoring
the formation of N2 vs N2O and NO+/NO2
.
-
Experimental Section
Reagents. Na3[Fe(CN)5NH3]‚3H2O was synthesized and purified
according to literature procedures.17 NH2OH‚HCl (Merck, 99%), 15NH2-
OH‚HCl (Isotec, 99% of 15N atoms), (N2H5)2SO4, pyrazinamide, D2O,
95% thiosuccinic acid, and 99% methyl methacrylate (Aldrich) were
used as received. N2 and Ar (AGA, UAP) were used for previous
bubbling of the solutions. The buffer solutions were prepared using
reagent grade Na2B4O7‚10H2O (Merck, 99%), KH2PO4 (Merck, 99%),
and NaOH (Anwill, 99%). Deionized distilled water was used in all
the experiments.
Physical Measurements. UV-vis spectra were recorded in a UV
2101-PC Shimadzu instrument, in the range 300-900 nm. Comple-
mentary measurements in the near-infrared region (NIR), up to 1500
nm, were obtained with a Shimadzu 3101 PC instrument. Some kinetic
runs were carried out with an Applied Photophysics RX 1000 stopped
flow (SF) accessory, linked to a Hewlett-Packard 8453 diode array
spectrophotometer. Qualitative and quantitative gas production were
conducted using a thermostated homemade flow reactor (volume, 0.07
dm3) linked to a vacuum system and to an Extrel Emba II quadrupolar
mass spectrometer through a thin thermostated capillary. The reactor
The experiments were carried out under oxygen-free conditions
(bubbling with, and mixed under N2 or Ar), avoiding the formation of
the [FeIII(CN)5H2O]2- ion (λmax ) 394 nm, ꢀ ) 750 M-1 cm-1),21
potentially produced by oxidation of [FeII(CN)5H2O]3- 18
.
The reactions were studied at 25.0 °C in buffer solution (0.1 or 1 M
in phosphates for pH 6-8 or 0.1 M in Borax for pH 9.3). The detailed
procedures were as follows. For the UV-vis kinetic experiments,
Na3[Fe(CN)5NH3]‚3H2O was dissolved in a volume of buffer solution
(final concentration (0.02-3.0) × 10-3 M). A sample was put in the
quartz cell (optical path 0.1 or 1 cm) and a desired amount of NH2OH
solution was added over the range 2 × 10-5-10-1 M. Absorbance
values at fixed wavelengths (440, 520 nm) were registered as a function
of time. The kinetic runs in the SF regime were performed under
pseudo-first-order conditions in NH2OH ((2.0-5.0) × 10-3 M, I ) 1
M, NaCl; pH 7), by monitoring, at 440 nm, the decay of the absorbance
of 1.0 × 10-4 M [Fe(CN)5H2O]3-. The measured values were fitted to
ln(At - A∞) against time. The pseudo-first-order rate constants (kobs
/
s-1) were plotted against [NH2OH]0, thus obtaining a second-order rate
constant (kf/M-1 s-1). For the measurement of the gaseous products,
0.025-0.040 dm3 of a buffered solution of NH2OH at the desired
concentration (5 × 10-4 - 2 × 10-1 M) and a measured amount of
solid Na3[Fe(CN)5NH3]‚3H2O (final concentration, (1-3) × 10-3 M)
were placed separately inside the reactor. Both reactants were mixed
after evacuation, and the time evolution of the gaseous stream was
continuously monitored. The evolution of the total pressure of the
system (psys) was obtained by numerical integration of the balance
equation: (dpsys/dt) ) (dpobs/dt) + (ke × pobs2), with pobs being the
measured pressure and ke ≈ 2 × 10-5 Torr-1 min-1, the leak constant.
The products of the reaction were N2 and N2O, and quantitative
determinations required the calibration of the mass spectrometer
(9) (a) Nast, R.; Hieber, W.; Proeschel, E. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1948, 13,
339. (b) Nast, R.; Foppel, J. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1950, 263, 310.
(10) (a) Choi, I. K.; Liu, Y.; Wei, Z.; Ryan, M. D. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36,
3113-3118. (b) Barley, M. H.; Takeuchi, K. J.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1986, 108, 5876-5885. (c) Bazylinski, D. A.; Arkowitz, R. A.;
Hollocher, T. C. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1987, 259, 520-526. (d)
Castignetti, D.; Hollocher, T. C. Appl. EnVironm. Microbiol. 1982, 44, 923-
928. (e) Bagchi, S. N.; Kleiner, D. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1990, 1041,
9-13.
(11) (a) Lunak, S.; Veprek-Siska, J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1974, 39,
41-48. (b) Lunak, S.; Veprek-Siska, J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.
1974, 39, 391-395. (c) Bonner, F. T.; Akhtar, M. J. Inorg. Chem. 1981,
20, 3155-3160.
(12) Lunak, S.; Veprek-Siska, J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1974, 39,
2719-2723.
(13) (a) Macartney, D. H. ReV. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 6, 101-151. (b) Baraldo,
L. M.; Forlano, P.; Parise, A. R.; Slep, L. D.; Olabe, J. A. Coord. Chem.
ReV. 2001, 219-221, 881-921.
(14) Olabe, J. A. AdV. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 55, 61-126.
(15) Banyai, I.; Dozsa, L.; Beck, M. T.; Gyemant, G. J. Coord. Chem. 1996,
37, 257-270.
(18) Toma, H. E. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1975, 15, 205-211.
(19) Olabe, J. A.; Zerga, H. O. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 4156-4158.
(20) Bridgart, G. J.; Waters, W. A.; Wilson, I. R. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1973, 1582-1584.
(16) Wolfe, S. K.; Andrade, C.; Swinehart, J. H. Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 2567-
2572.
(17) Kenney, D. J.; Flynn, T. P.; Gallini, J. B. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1961, 20,
75-81.
(21) Espenson, J. H.; Wolenuk, S. G., Jr. Inorg. Chem. 1972, 11, 2034-2041.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 41, 2004 13433