Applications of (Me3SiNSN)2E in Chalcogen-Nitrogen Chemistry
polarization effects, and an empirical absorption correction was
applied to the net intensities. The structures 1 and 2 were solved
by direct methods using SHELXS-9731 and were refined using
SHELXL-97.32 The structures 4a and 4b were solved and refined
by using programs Bruker SMART,33 SAINT,33 SHELXTL,34 and
local programs. The scattering factors for the neutral atoms were
those incorporated with the programs.
Computational Details. Ab initio MO calculations of Cl2TeESN2
(E ) S, Se) were carried out using the Stuttgart relativistic large
core effective core potential approximation (RLC ECP)35-37 by
augmenting the double-ú quality basis sets of the valence orbitals
by two polarization functions for all atoms. Fundamental vibrations
and the geometry optimization of 1 and 2 were calculated at the
DFT level of theory involving Becke’s three-parameter hybrid
functionals with the Perdew/Wang 91 correlation (B3PW91).38-44
The calculated wavenumbers were scaled by 0.993 to eliminate
the systematic errors.45 The calculations for geometry optimizations
and fundamental vibrations were also performed at the same level
of theory with DZVP46 basis set which takes into account all
electrons of the atoms. In both cases, an excellent correlation
between the calculated and observed wavenumbers was achieved.
Calculations were performed with the GAUSSIAN 03 (Rev. B.04)
program.47
The EI mass spectra of both the initial reaction precipitate
and the crystallized product from the decanted solutions
formed in the reactions of both (Me3SiNSN)2S and (Me3-
SiNSN)2Se with TeCl4 exhibited the molecular ions of 1 and
+
2 (Cl2TeS2N2 , and Cl2TeSeSN2+), respectively, as fragments
of highest mass. A reasonable fragmentation pattern was also
observed for both compounds. The fragments were unam-
biguously assigned by consideration of isotopic distributions.
The calculated isotopic distributions of the molecular ions
of 1 and 2 as well as their fragments agree well with the
observed isotopic distribution patterns. The fragmentation
patterns are consistent with those proposed by Haas et al.9,12
The 14N and 125Te NMR spectra of 1 and 2 were recorded
in THF. The 14N NMR spectrum of 1 shows four signals at
-79, -121, -256, and -361 ppm and that of 2 shows four
resonances at -79, -108, -256, and -361 ppm. In both
cases, the first two signals are assigned to the five-membered
Cl2TeESN2 (E ) S, Se) rings (-79 and -121 ppm for 1
and -79 and -108 ppm for 2) and the latter two resonances
are assigned to S4N4 (-256 ppm) and NH4Cl (-361 ppm).27
The 14N chemical shifts of 1 and 2 are reasonable for the
five-membered TeS2N2-rings containing a NdSdN frag-
ment.50 The 125Te spectrum of 1 shows a single resonance
at 2110 ppm and that of 2 exhibits a single resonance at
1973 ppm, These two resonances show expected relative
values, since the replacement of the selenium atom with a
more electronegative sulfur atom in the five-membered
equatorial ring can be considered to cause deshielding of
the adjacent tellurium atom. However, Haas et al.9 reported
Results and Discussions
Reactions of (Me3SiNSN)2E with TeCl4 (E ) S, Se).48,49
The reaction of (Me3SiNSN)2S with TeCl4 in CH2Cl2 affords
Cl2TeS2N2 (1) in ca. 32% yield. The reaction also produces
N2, Me3SiCl, and S4N4 (eq 1). Some S4N4 subsequently reacts
with TeCl4 yielding a small amount of S4N4‚TeCl4 (3).17
a
125Te chemical shift of 1764 ppm for 1 recorded in THF/
(Me3SiNSN)2E + TeCl4 f
C6D6 (1:1). The 77Se NMR spectrum of 2 exhibits a single
resonance at 1195 ppm.
Cl2TeESN2 + 2Me3SiCl + 1/2N2 + 1/4S4N4 (1)
The Raman spectra of crystalline 1 and 2 are shown in
Figure 1.51 The assignment of the observed fundamental
vibrations of Cl2TeS2N2 (1) is based on the B3PW91
In an analogous manner, (Me3SiNSN)2Se reacts with TeCl4
producing Cl2TeSeSN2 (2) in ca. 48% yield (eq 1). In this
reaction, we did not observe the formation of S4N4‚TeCl4
(3).
(47) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin,
K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone,
V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G.
A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.;
Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai,
H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.;
Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev,
O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P.
Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.;
Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas,
O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J.
B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.;
Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.;
Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.;
Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M., Gill; P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen,
W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. GAUSSIAN 03, Revision
B.04; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
(31) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXS-97, Program for Crystal Structure Deter-
mination; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997.
(32) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal Structure Refine-
ment; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997.
(33) SMART and SAINT software for CCD diffractometers; Bruker AXS,
Inc.: Madison, WI, 1994.
(34) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL, User Manual, Version 5; Bruker AXS,
Inc.: Madison, WI, 1994.
(35) Kuechle, W.; Dolg, M.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H. Mol. Phys. 1991, 74,
1245.
(36) Bergner, A.; Dolg, M.; Kuechle, W.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H. Mol. Phys.
1993, 80, 1431.
(37) Buhl, M.; Thiel, W.; Fleischer, U.; Kutzelnigg, W. J. Phys. Chem.
1995, 99, 4000.
(38) Becke, A. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 98, 5648.
(39) Burke, K.; Perdew, J. P.; Wang, Y. In Electron Density Functional
Theory: Recent Progress and New Directions; Dobson, J. F., Vignale,
G., Das, M. P., Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1998.
(40) Perdew, J. P. In Electronic Structure of Solids; Ziesche, P., Eschrig,
H., Eds.; Akademie Verlag: Berlin, 1991.
(48) Haas et al.9 have reported that the reaction of [(Me3Si)2N]2S with TeCl4
and SCl2 in CH2Cl2 also produces Cl2TeS2N2. Although the charac-
terization of their product was incomplete, we believe that this reaction
indeed affords 1.
(41) Perdew, J. P.; Wang, Y. Phys. ReV. 1992, B45, 13244.
(42) Perdew, J. P.; Chevary, J. A.; Vosko, S. H.; Jackson, K. A.; Pederson,
M. R.; Singh, D. J.; Fiolhais, C. Phys. ReV. 1992, B46, 6671.
(43) Perdew, J. P.; Chevary, J. A.; Vosko, S. H.; Jackson, K. A.; Pederson,
M. R.; Singh, D. J.; Fiolhais, C. Phys. ReV. 1993, B48, 4978.
(44) Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Wang, Y. Phys. ReV. 1996, B54, 16553.
(45) Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502.
(46) Godbout, N.; Salahub, D. R.; Andzelm, J.; Wimmer, E. Can. J. Chem.
1992, 70, 560.
(49) Haas et al. have reported the preparation of 2 by the reactions of Se-
12
(NSO)2 with TeCl4 and [(Me3Si)2N]2S with TeCl4 and SeCl4.9
(50) Cl2SeS2N229 that also contains the NdSdN fragment has been reported
to exhibit two 14N resonances at -51.7 and -137.8 ppm. The ionic
nature of the five-membered ring and the higher electronegativity of
sulfur and selenium compared to that of tellurium may explain the
minor differences in chemical shifts.
(51) Raman spectrum was recorded both from the reaction precipitate and
from the crystals to verify the identity of the products.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 44, No. 14, 2005 4995