2970
M.S.C. Pedras, Y. Yu / Phytochemistry 69 (2008) 2966–2971
units are 10ꢀ1 deg cm2 gꢀ1 and the concentrations are reported in
g/100 ml.
1.04 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d 171.5 (2C),
158.8, 116.6, 115.0, 74.0, 72.5, 67.6 (2C), 62.8, 61.9 (2C), 24.8,
21.3 (2C), 20.8 (2C), 19.5, 16.6, (C-10, -60, and -100 were not de-
tected). 13C NMR spectral data were obtained from analysis of
HMQC and HMBC correlations.
Chemical degradation of maculansin A (9). Na2CO3 (10.0 mg)
was added to a solution of maculansin A 9 (8.0 mg, 0.017 mmol)
dissolved in MeOH (4.0 ml). The reaction mixture was stirred for
4 h at room temperature then concentrated. The residue was dis-
solved in H2O (5 ml), the pH of the solution was adjusted to 2, fol-
lowed by extraction (CH2Cl2). The aqueous layer was concentrated
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra (1H, 13C, HMQC-het-
eronuclear multiple quantum coherence, HMBC-heteronuclear
multiple bond coherence) were recorded on Bruker Avance 500
spectrometers. High resolution (HR) electron impact (EI) mass
spectra (MS) were obtained on a VG 70 SE mass spectrometer
employing a solids probe. LC–MS–ESI data were obtained on an
Agilent 1100 HPLC system coupled to an LC/MSD ion trap detector
with electrospray ionization. Chromatographic separation was car-
ried out at room temperature using an Eclipse XSB C-18 column
(5
l
m particle size silica, 150 mm ꢁ 4.6 mm) equipped with an on-
to dryness then pyridine (500 ll) and Ac2O (500 ll) were added to
line filter. The mobile phase consisted of a gradient of 0.2% HCO2H
in H2O (A) and 0.2% HCO2H in CH3CN (B); linear gradient elution
starting with 75:25 of A/B to 25:75 of A/B in 35 min, to 100% B
in 5 min and a flow rate 1.0 mL/min. Other conditions were as pre-
viously reported (Pedras et al., 2006).
HPLC–DAD analysis was carried out with Agilent high perfor-
mance liquid chromatographs equipped with quaternary pump,
automatic injector, and diode array detector (DAD, wavelength
the residue and the reaction mixture stirred for 5 h at room tem-
perature. After concentration to dryness, the residue was separated
(prep TLC, MeOH–CH2Cl2, 4:96) to yield a compound (6.7 mg) iden-
tical to
and specific optical rotation data ([
tic -mannitol hexaacetate [ D = 12 (c 0.26, CHCl3)).
D
-mannitol hexaacetate as determined by 1H NMR, HRMS
a]D = 13 (c 0.51, CHCl3); authen-
D
a]
4.4. Bioactivity assays
range 190–600 nm), degasser, and a Hypersil ODS column (5 lm
particle size silica, 4.6 i.d. ꢁ 200 mm), having an in-line filter. Mo-
bile phase: 75% H2O-25% CH3CN to 100% CH3CN, for 35 min, linear
gradient, and at a flow rate 1.0 ml/min.
Three activity assays were carried out as described below.
Elicitor activity. Canola (B. napus cv. Westar, susceptible to L.
maculans) and brown mustard (B. juncea cv. Cutlass, resistant to
L. maculans) were grown in a growth chamber with 16 h light (fluo-
4.2. Fungal isolates and culture conditions
rescent and incandescent, 450–530 l
mol sꢀ1 mꢀ2)/8 h dark, at
24 2 °C. After two weeks, extracts dissolved in MeOH–H2O (1:1,
v/v) solutions were applied to leaves punctured with a needle
(about 20 punctures per leaf). After two days, the leaf tissues were
frozen in liquid N2, crushed with a glass rod and extracted with
50 ml EtOAc. EtOAc extract was dried over Na2SO4 and concen-
trated in a rotary evaporator. The residue was dissolved in 1%
MeOH–CH2Cl2, applied to a mini silica gel column (Pasteur pipette)
and eluted with 1% MeOH–CH2Cl2 (5 ml); the eluate was concen-
Canadian virulent isolate of L. maculans IBCN 57 (BJ 125) was
grown in Erlenmeyer flasks (250 ml) containing PDB (100 ml),
inoculated with fungal spores (108 spores/100 ml) and incubated
on a shaker at 120 rpm, at 23, 25, 27, and 29 °C. Culture samples
(20 ml) of 4-day-old or 7-day-old cultures were filtered to separate
the broth from mycelia. The broth was extracted with EtOAc
(20 ml ꢁ 3) and the EtOAc layer was dried over Na2SO4 and con-
centrated. The residue was dissolved in CH3CN (1.0 ml) and ana-
lyzed by HPLC.
trated, the residue was dissolved in CH3CN (80 ll) and analyzed
by HPLC. Control leaves were treated similarly (MeOH–H2O, 1:1)
and analyzed by HPLC. All assays were carried out in triplicate.
Phytotoxic activity. Canola, brown mustard and white mustard
(S. alba cv. Ochre, resistant to L. maculans) were grown as described
above. Solutions of either fractions or purified compounds dis-
solved in MeOH–H2O (1:1, v/v) were applied to punctured leaves
4.3. Isolation and characterization of maculansins A (9) and B (10)
PDB cultures of L. maculans (5 l) were prepared as reported
above and grown in an incubator at 27 °C to maximize production
of 9. After four days, the cultures were combined and filtered, the
broth was extracted with EtOAc, and the EtOAc layer was concen-
trated to yield 360 mg of residue. The residue was separated by
FCC (RP-18, CH3CN–H2O, 10:90 to 40:60, gradient elution) to yield
30 fractions (15 ml per fraction). Fractions 8–10 were combined
and further purified by FCC (MeOH–CH2Cl2 0:100 to 5:95, gradient
elution) to give compound 8 (10.5 mg). Fractions 15 to 18 were
combined (45.1 mg) and further purified by prep TLC (MeOH–
CH2Cl2, 5:95) to yield compound 9 (9.7 mg) and a mixture of the
component with Rt = 14.7 min (mixture of isomers structural type
similar to 9). Fractions 22–25 contained a mixture of maculansin
type metabolites that were further separated by prep TLC to yield
an epimeric mixture of maculansin B (10, 1.6 mg).
(5 ll, 6 punctures per leaf). After two days, the damaged areas
were measured using a stencil having cut out circles with different
diameters, and the measured diameters were converted to the
damage index, as shown in Table 2. All bioassays were carried
out in triplicate.
Root growth inhibition activity. Seeds of brown mustard (20)
and canola (20) were sterilized by soaking in Javex (10%) for
10 minutes, washed with H2O, air dried and incubated in PDB med-
ium (0.9 g/100 ml) amended with compound 8 (0.5 mM). The
dishes were sealed with parafilm and kept in darkness at room
temperature. After 7 days the root length of seedlings was mea-
sured with a ruler.
Maculansin A (9). HPLC Rt = 16.4 min. HRMS–EI: m/z 480.1749,
C22H28N2O10, calcd. 480.1744. MS–EI: m/z 480 (3%), 465 (22%), 115
(100%). for 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data see Table 1. FTIR
Table 2
Scale for conversion of damaged area to damage index
(KBr): 3460, 2960, 2923, 2116, 1740, 1732, 1222 cmꢀ1
. UV
Lesion diameter (mm)
Damage index
(MeOH): kmax (log
e) 231 (4.2) nm; [
a]
D = ꢀ71 (c 0.10, CHCl3).
Maculansin B (10). HPLC Rt = 18.3 min. HRMS–ESI: [M + Na]+
m/z 505.1807, C22H28N2O10Na, calcd. 505.1792. HRMS–ESI–MS/
MS: m/z 505 (100%), 380 (40%), 378 (70%), 253 (27%). 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3): d 5.2 (m, 1 H), 5.1 (m, 1 H), 4.6 (m, 2 H), 4.4
(m, 2 H), 4.28 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.8 (m, 2 H), 3.07 (d, J = 7.4 Hz,
1 H, OH), 2.93 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H, OH), 2.4 (m, 1 H), 2.32 (s, 3 H),
2.19 (s, 3 H), 2.10 (s, 3 H), 2.09 (s, 3 H), 1.14 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H),
<1.5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1.6–2.3
2.4–3.1
3.2–3.9
4.0–4.7
4.8–5.5
5.6–6.3
6.4–7.0