A comparison of methods for N-oxidation of some 3-substituted pyridines

Article abstract of DOI:10.1080/00397919708006090

The results from the N-oxidation of four 3-substituted pyridines using five different reagents are reported. The best yields are obtained with m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid.

Full text of DOI:10.1080/00397919708006090

This article was downloaded by: [New Mexico State University]
On: 17 September 2013, At: 04:48
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954
Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,
UK
Synthetic Communications: An
International Journal for Rapid
Communication of Synthetic
Organic Chemistry
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lsyc20
A Comparison of Methods
for N-Oxidation of Some 3-
Substituted Pyridines
a
a
David H Bremner , Keith R Sturrock , Grant
a
a
a
Wishart , Stewart R Mitchell , Stuart M Nicoll
&
a
Gareth Jones
a
Division of Chemistry, School of Molecular and Life
Sciences, University of Abertay Dundee, Bell Street,
Dundee, Scotland, DD1 1HG
Published online: 22 Aug 2006.
To cite this article: David H Bremner , Keith R Sturrock , Grant Wishart , Stewart
R Mitchell , Stuart M Nicoll & Gareth Jones (1997) A Comparison of Methods for
N-Oxidation of Some 3-Substituted Pyridines, Synthetic Communications: An
International Journal for Rapid Communication of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 27:9,
1535-1542, DOI: 10.1080/00397919708006090
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00397919708006090
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,
or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views
expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and

are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the
Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with
primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any
losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,
and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the
Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,
sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is
expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions