(t, J = 6.6 Hz, 1 H, CHCl) and 7.33–7.43 (m, 5 H, aromatic). CI
mass spectrum: m/z 156 (Mϩ).
Table 1 Catalytic ring opening of styrene oxide by SiMe3(N3)
2-Azido-1-phenylethanol. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 2.38 (s br, 1 H,
OH), 3.44 (dd, J = 4.2, 12.6, 1 H, CH2N3), 3.50 (dd, J = 7.8, 12.6
Hz, 1 H, CH2N3), 4.90–4.93 (m, 1 H, CHOH) and 7.32–7.39 (m,
5 H, aromatic).
O
(1) SiMe3(N3), catalyst N3
OH
HO
Ph
N3 Cl
+
OH
+
(2) H +
2
1
Ph
Ph
Ph
Preparation of [{Cr(NBut)2Cl}2(ì-N3)2] 1
I
II
III
The compound SiMe3(N3) (0.44 cm3, 3.31 mmol) was added to
a solution of [Cr(NBut)2Cl2] (0.22 g, 0.83 mmol) in hexane (10
cm3). The reaction mixture was refluxed overnight. The solvent
was removed in vacuo and the residue recrystallised from
toluene. Dark red crystals were obtained after cooling the
solution to Ϫ10 ЊC overnight {yield 25% with respect to [Cr-
% Yield
Catalyst a
Solvent
I
II
III Reaction time
[Cr(NBut)2Cl2]
CH2Cl2 90
CH2Cl2 90
CH2Cl2 63 30
thf
MeCN
CH2Cl2
0
0
7
0
3
2
0
0
0
9
12 h
10 h
5 h
12 h
24 h
5 d
[{Cr(NBut)2Cl}2(N3)2]
[Cr(NBut)Cl3(dme)]
42 10
1
(NBut)2Cl2] used}. H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.64 (s, 36 H, But).
4
0
0
0
0
0
[CrL(NBut)Cl2]b
IR (cmϪ1): 1198 ν(Cr᎐NBut) and 2098 ν(N ) (Found: C, 35.2;
᎐
3
[Mo(NBut)2Cl2(dme)]
[{Ti(NBut)Cl2(NH2But)2}3]
CH2Cl2 45
CH2Cl2 45
2 d
20 h
H, 6.8; N, 26.8. Calc. for C16H36Cl2Cr2N10: C, 35.4; H, 6.6;
N, 25.8%).
a
Catalyst loading was 10 mol % except for the reactions with [Cr(N-
But)Cl3(dme)], in which 5 mol % catalyst was used. b L = (η-C5H5)Co-
{PO(OEt)2}3.
Preparation of [Cr(ButN᎐N᎐N᎐NSiMe )(N )Cl ] 2
᎐
᎐
3
3
2
The compound SiMe3(N3) (0.50 cm3, 3.77 mmol) was added to
a solution of [Cr(NBut)Cl3(dme)] (0.30 g, 0.94 mmol) in CH2Cl2
(10 cm3). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature
overnight. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue
recrystallised from CH2Cl2–diethyl ether to give a dark yellow
solid (yield 75%). IR (cmϪ1): 2110 ν(N3). CI mass spectrum: m/z
264 (Mϩ Ϫ N2 Ϫ isobutene). µeff(Evans method,16 CHCl3) =
3.52 µB (Found: C, 23.4; H, 5.2; N, 25.4. Calc. for
C10H27Cl2CrN8Si2: C, 23.9; H, 5.1; N, 27.9%).
diffractometer at 25 ЊC. Intensity data were corrected for
Lorentz-polarization effects. The structure was solved by direct
methods (SIR 9218) and refined by full-matrix least-squares
analysis with hydrogen atoms placed in calculated positions.
CCDC reference number 186/650.
Results and Discussion
Ring opening of cyclohexene oxide by [Cr(NBut)Cl3(dme)] with
(S,S )-diop
Catalytic azidolysis of styrene oxide
tert-Butylimidochromium complexes [Cr(NBut)2Cl2] and
[Cr(NBut)Cl3(dme)] catalyse ring opening of styrene oxide with
SiMe3(N3) to give the vicinal azidohydrins in good yields and
the results are summarised in Table 1. Typically reaction of
styrene oxide with SiMe3(N3) in the presence of 10 mol %
of [Cr(NBut)Cl3(dme)] afforded a 1:2 mixture of azidohydrins
I and II in 93% yield.
A mixture of cyclohexene oxide (0.61 mmol), [Cr(NBut)-
Cl3(dme)] (10 mmol), (S,S )-diop (10 mmol) and SiMe3(N3)
(1.83 mmol) was stirred in CH2Cl2 (5 cm3) at room temperature
for 3 d. The reaction mixture was worked up as described earlier
and the products were identified as racemic mixtures of 2-
azidocyclohexanols (30%) and 2-chlorocyclohexanol (20%) by
GLC.
Depending on the purity of the catalyst and experimental
conditions, some chlorohydrin III was also detected. It is
apparently derived from the chloride of the catalyst because
none was detected when the azidochromium complex [{Cr-
(NBut)Cl(N3)}2(µ-N3)2] (see later) was employed as the catalyst.
The corresponding reactions with [Cr(NBut)2Cl2] and [Mo-
(NBut)2Cl2]19 were slower but selective, yielding the 2-azido-
alcohol I exclusively. The preference for the formation of I by
the ring opening of styrene oxide may be explained in terms of
the stability of the benzylic carbocation intermediate, which
is susceptible to nucleophilic attack by azide. The activity of
imidometal complexes in epoxide ring opening was found to
decrease in the order CrV > TiIV > CrVI > MoVI, which reflects
the trend in Lewis acidity of the metal centre. The lower Lewis
acidity of [Cr(NBut)2Cl2] compared with that of [Cr(NBut)-
Cl3(dme)] may be reasoned by the fact that the former complex,
although in a higher oxidation state, is stabilised by two strong-
ly π-donating imides and is therefore a weaker Lewis acid. No
catalytic reaction was observed when co-ordinatively saturated
[(η-C5H5)Co{PO(OEt)2}3Cr(NBut)Cl2]20 was used as catalyst,
suggesting that a vacant site on chromium is essential for the
catalytic ring opening. However, there is no appreciable differ-
ence in catalytic activity between [Cr(NBut)Cl3(dme)] and the
more substitutionally labile [Cr(NBut)Cl3(thf)2], indicating
that dissociation of the ether ligands in the imidochromium()
complexes is not a rate-limiting step in the chromium-catalysed
azidolysis reaction. The catalytic epoxide ring opening is rather
insensitive to the choice of solvent, although the yield for
CH2Cl2 was found to be slightly higher than that for thf. This is
in contrast to the Cr(salen) [H2salen = N,NЈ-bis(salicylidene)-
ethane-1,2-diamine] system,10 in which epoxide ring opening
Preparation of [{Cr(NBut)Cl3}2{ì-(S,S )-diop}] 4
The compound (S,S )-diop (0.27 g, 0.54 mmol) was added to a
solution of [Cr(NBut)Cl3(thf)2] (0.20 g, 0.54 mmol) in CH2Cl2
(10 cm3). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature
overnight. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue
washed with toluene. Recrystallisation from CH2Cl2–Et2O
afforded green prisms, suitable for X-ray diffraction study
{Yield 33% with respect to [Cr(NBut)Cl3(thf)2] used} (Found:
C, 55.7; H, 5.8; N, 2.5. Calc. for C53H66Cl6Cr2N2O2P2: C, 55.3;
H, 5.7; N, 2.6%).
X-Ray crystallography
Crystal data and experimental details for complexes 1 and 4 are
listed in Table 2. Measurements for 1 were made on an Enraf-
Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer. X-Ray-quality crystals of
[{Cr(NBut)2Cl}2(µ-N3)2] 1 were obtained from a toluene solu-
tion at Ϫ10 ЊC. Lattice parameters for 1 were obtained from 25
reflections with 2θ 19.02–27.70Њ. All reflections were corrected
for Lorentz-polarisation effects. All data reduction and refine-
ment was performed using the NRCVAX packages.17 The
structure was solved by the Patterson method and refined on F
by full-matrix least-squares analysis. All hydrogen atoms were
refined isotropically and all other atoms anisotropically.
Hydrogen atoms on the organic ligands were calculated in ideal-
ised positions and included in the structure-factor calculation.
X-Ray-quality crystals of [{Cr(NBut)Cl3}2{µ-(S,S )-diop}] 4
were obtained by slow diffusion of ether into a CH2Cl2
solution. Measurements were made on a Rigaku AFC7R
3526
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1997, Pages 3525–3529