1350
A. Kamal, G. Chouhan / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 1347–1350
Acknowledgements
4 mol% Sc(OTf)3, HS(CH2)3SH
O
O
O
S
S
( )n
( )n
H
R
H
R
CH2Cl2, r.t.
n=1,2
One of the authors (G.C.) would like to thank the
8a-d
9a-d
IICT, Hyderabad for the award of
Fellowship.
a Research
R=p-OCH3Ph, Ph,
CH3, 2-thiophene
Scheme 3.
References
1. (a) Corey, E. J.; Seebach, D. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31,
4097; (b) Seebach, D. Synthesis 1969, 17; (c) Groebel,
B.-T.; Seebach, D. Synthesis 1977, 357; (d) Seebach, D.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1979, 18, 239; (e) Bulman
Page, P. C.; van Niel, M. B.; Prodger, J. Tetrahedron
1989, 45, 7643.
2. Greene, T. W. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis;
John Wiley: New York, 1981; pp. 129–133.
3. Corey, E. J.; Shimoji, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 169.
4. Fieser, L. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 1945.
5. Ong, B. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 4225.
6. Kumar, V.; Dev, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 1289.
7. Garlaschelli, L.; Vidari, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31,
5815.
4 mol% Sc(OTf)3, HS(CH2)3SH
CH2Cl2, r.t., 8 h
O
O
O
S
S
OC2H5
R
OC2H5
R
R=Ph, CH3,
2-thiophene
0%
Scheme 4.
COCH3
+
O
COCH3
S
S
4 mol% Sc(OTf)3, HS(CH2)3SH,
CH2Cl2, r.t., 5 h
+
8. Firouzabadi, H.; Iranpoor, N.; Karimi, B. Synthesis
1999, 58.
9. Muthusamy, S.; Arulananda Babu, S.; Gunanathan, C.
97%
90%
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 359.
10. Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Pandey, S. K. Synlett 2001,
238.
Scheme 5.
11. For a review, see: Kobayashi, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
1, 15.
12. Crotti, P.; Bussol, V. D.; Favero, L.; Psero, M. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 9548.
13. Kobayshi, S.; Hachiya, I.; Araki, M.; Ishitani, H. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1993, 34, 3755.
14. Kawada, A.; Mitamura, S.; Kobayashi, S. Synlett 1994,
545.
This method has also been extended for the intramolec-
ular chemoselectivity between keto and aldehyde func-
tionalities (Scheme 3). However, enolizable ketones
under the same conditions with scandium triflate did
not produce the corresponding dithioacetals, even after
prolonged reaction times (Scheme 4).
15. Kobayashi, S.; Moriwaki, M.; Hachiya, I. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1995, 1527.
16. Kobayashi, S. Synlett 1994, 689.
Furthermore, it was also observed that the aliphatic
ketone, cyclohexanone, could be selectively protected in
the presence of the aromatic ketone, acetophenone, by
employing the present methodology (Scheme 5).
17. Typical experimental procedure: To a stirred solution of
scandium triflate (4 mol%) and p-chlorobenzaldehyde (4
mmol) in dichloromethane (50 ml) at room temperature
was added ethanethiol (4.8 mmol). The mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 20 min. After completion
of the reaction, as indicated by TLC, water (25 ml) was
added to the reaction mixture, which was then extracted
with dichloromethane. The crude product was purified by
silica gel column chromatography to furnish the thioac-
etal in 93% yield. The aqueous layer containing the
catalyst could be evaporated under reduced pressure to
give a white solid. The FT-IR spectrum of the recovered
material was identical to that of the commercially avail-
able salt, which could be reused for the next thioacetal-
ization reaction (Table 1, product 2b).
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the use of scan-
dium triflate for the thioacetalization of aromatic,
aliphatic and heterocyclic aldehydes under extremely
mild conditions where the catalyst could be readily
recovered and reused thus making this procedure envi-
ronmentally acceptable. Moreover, the demonstration
of the high chemoselectivity between the two keto
functionalities as well as the keto and aldehyde groups,
in good to high yields and in short reaction times
makes the present method a practical protocol for
thioacetalization.