three novel insecticides successively since 1999. They exert their pesticidal efficacy through the persistent release of intracellular Ca2+
ion, which ultimately leads to the death of insects. Among those three RyRs insecticides, chlorantraniliprole and cyantraniliprole (Fig.
1
, A) both possess an anthranilic diamide structure containing a bromopyrazole ring linked with a chloropyridyl moiety. Due to their
excellent insecticidal and eco-friendly properties, the studies on various modifications of such structures have received considerable
attention in the last decade [6-12].
It was reported that more than half of commercial pesticides are fluorinated among which 50% percentage are insecticides and
acaricides, during 2010-2016 [13]. This situation may be because that the introduction of fluorine atom could greatly influence the
biological activities of the parent molecule owing to the good hydrophobility, permeability, stability and combining ability of the
fluorinated compound [14]. For example, novel insecticides and acaricides sulfoxaflor [15], flupyradifurone [16] and pyflubumide [17]
all have fluorine-containing substituents just as flubendiamide (contains a heptafluoroisopropyl group). Moreover, some
trifluoroethoxyl-containing anthranilic diamide derivatives, e.g., compound B in Fig. 1, also exhibited perfect insecticidal activities
against M. separate, P. xylostella, etc. [10,18-19].
In addition, FKI-1033 (Fig. 1, C) was reported to have activation effect on RyRs and exhibited insecticidal activity [20]. Based on
the structural features of chiral α-amino acid ester moieties in FKI-1033, and chiral amide moiety in compound D (Fig. 1) that were
derived from our recent researches, the D-amino acid moieties were considered to be favorable for retaining insecticidal activity [7,21].
In view of all those information mentioned above, a series of new anthranilic diamides containing trifluoroethoxyl and chiral amino
acid moieties were synthesized as showed in Fig. 1. The insecticidal activities of the new compounds against oriental armyworm and
diamondback moth were evaluated. The preliminary structure-activity relationship (SAR) was also discussed.
The melting points were determined on an X-4 binocular microscope melting point apparatus (Beijing Tech Instrument Co., Beijing,
1
13
China) and were uncorrected. H NMR and C NMR spectra were recorded at 400 MHz using a Bruker AV 400 spectrometer (Bruker
Co., Switzerland) in CDCl or DMSO-d solution with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. Elemental analyses were
3
6
performed on a Vario EL elemental analyzer (Elementar Co., Germany). Optical rotations were measured with a PerkinElmer 341
polarimeter (PE-PerkinElmer Co., Ltd, U.S.A.). Column chromatography purification was carried out using silica gel (200-300 mesh).
All chemical reagents and solvents were of analytical grade.
3
-(2,2,2-Trifluoroethoxy)-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxylic acid 6 was synthesized referring to literature (Scheme
S1 in Supporting information) [17]. The chiral amino acid esters 9a-f were obtained by the reaction of corresponding D-amino acid
with various alcohols (Scheme S2 in Supporting information) [22].
2
-(3-(2,2,2-Trifluoroethoxy)-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-yl)-6-chloro-8-methyl-4H-benzo[d][1,3]oxazin-4-one 11a was
obtained by reported procedure [19]. 3-(2,2,2-Trifluoroethoxy)-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxylic acid 6 (10 mmol)
and 2-amino-5-chloro-3-methylbenzoic acid 10a (10 mmol) were added into 25 mL of acetonitrile, the mixture was dissolved after the
addition of 4 mL of pyridine. And then, 2 mL of methanesulfonyl chloride was added slowly in ice-bath and stirred overnight. After
completion of the reaction, the mixture was filtered and the residual solid was the target compound 11a. The compounds 11b and 11c
were prepared according to 11a via an “one-pot” method.
(R)-Methyl
2-(2-(3-trifluoroethoxyl-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carbox-amido)-5-chloro-3-
methylbenzamido)propanoate Ia was prepared referring to the following procedure (Scheme S3 in Supporting information) [23]. 2-(3-
Trifluoroethoxyl-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-yl)-6-chloro-8-methyl-4H-benzo[1,3]-oxazin-4-one 11a (1.0 mmol) and (R)-
methyl 2-aminopropanoate hydrochloride 9a (1.2 mmol) was mixed with 10 mL of tetrahydrofuran, followed by the addition of
triethylamine (2.5 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred overnight. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was filtered and the
filtrate was evaporated in vacuum and purified on silica gel eluting with petroleum/ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v) to give Ia. Compounds Ib-i
were synthesized using similar procedure to that of Ia.
Using intermediates 11(a-c) and 9(d-f) as materials with similar procedure for Ia, the title compounds (5-substitued-2-(1-(3-
chloropyridin-2-yl)-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamido)-3-methylbenzoyl)serinate II(a-i) were obtained (Scheme
S3).
All of the title compounds were identified by melting points, H NMR, 13C NMR, elemental analysis and specific optical rotation
1
1
analysis (Supporting information). In the H NMR spectra of compounds Ia-i and IIa-i, the proton signals of two amide groups
“
−NHCO−” appeared at δ 10.42−9.75 as a singlet peak and δ 8.52−8.40 as a dd peak, respectively. The protons in trifluoroethoxyl
group (−OCH CF
) were observed at δ 4.72−4.62 as a mixed peak with the tertiary hydrogen (-CH) in chiral carbon. From the 13
NMR spectra of the title compounds, it was found that both of the carbons in –OCH CF group were split by the fluorine atoms as
quartet, with the coupling constant (J) showed up at 35 Hz for CH and 278 Hz for CF , respectively. From the specific optical rotation
analysis, all of the title compounds were dextrorotatory except Ic, If, IIe, IIf and IIh.
2
3
C
2
3
2
3
All of the biological assays were experimented on representative test organisms reared in laboratory. The test insects were cultured
according to literatures [24-25]. The bioassay was replicated at 25 ± 1 °C according to statistical requirements. Assessments were
based on a dead/alive scale, and mortality rates were rectified by Abbott’s formula [26]. Evaluation was based on a percentage scale of
0
−100, where 0 equals no activity and 100 equals total kill. Error of the experiments was kept within 5%. For comparative purposes,
chlorantraniliprole was tested as a control under the same conditions.