Novel Pyridine and Naphthalene Derivatives
J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 44, No. 1, 1996 225
Ta ble 2. Ma ss Sp ectr om etr ic Da ta
3
-phenylfuran
145 (12), 144 (100), 116 (11), 115 (86), 89 (14), 87 (3), 86 (3), 63 (12), 62 (5)
46 (10), 145 (100), 144 (38), 117 (10), 116 (82), 115 (36), 90 (10), 89 (10), 64 (7), 63 (10),
3 (12), 62 (5)a
1
6
3
3
,5-diphenylpyridine (X)
,4-diphenylpyridine
232 (19), 231 (100), 230 (24), 203 (5), 202 (12), 115 (3), 102 (10), 101 (6), 77 (4), 76 (6)
232 (19), 231 (100), 230 (70), 216 (14), 202 (21), 115 (9), 114 (9), 102 (8), 101 (13),
8
8 (8), 76 (7)
232 (18), 231 (100), 230 (61), 228 (6), 204 (4), 203 (3), 202 (9), 154 (6), 127 (10), 116 (4),
14 (8), 102 (20), 101 (7), 77 (15), 76 (10)
170 (13), 169 (98), 168 (100), 167 (38), 166 (6), 155 (3), 154 (18), 143 (1), 142 (8), 141 (13),
39 (9), 115 (20), 63 (10), 62 (3)
71 (11), 170 (84), 169 (100), 168 (53), 167 (13), 166 (1), 155 (14), 154 (7), 143 (5), 142 (11),
41 (21), 140 (8), 139 (7), 115 (19), 63 (9), 62 (4)a
156 (12), 155 (100), 154 (49), 128 (11), 127 (13), 102 (10), 77 (5), 51 (7)
57 (4), 156 (26), 155 (100), 154 (46), 128 (12), 127 (13), 102 (11), 77 (10), 51 (12)
2
4
,6-diphenylpyridine
1
-(phenylmethyl)pyridine
1
1
1
3
2
-phenylpyridine
1
-[5′-(hydroxymethyl)-2′-formylpyrrol-1′-yl]-
256 (11), 255 (27), 211 (4), 210 (5), 193 (2), 182 (2), 180 (2), 167 (2), 148 (5),
3
-phenylpropionic acid lactone
147 (5), 131 (11),120 (9), 108 (12), 104 (5), 103 (4), 92 (11), 91 (100), 78 (7), 77 (7), 63 (5),
5
1 (8)
N-(phenethyl)-1(2)-naphthaleneamine (Y)
248 (7), 247 (31), 157 (10), 156 (100), 143 (9), 128 (6), 127 (3), 78 (9), 77 (4)
N-(phenethyl)-N-methyl-1(2)-aminonaphthalene (Z) 262 (7), 261 (34), 171 (13), 170 (100),157 (3), 155 (3), 156 (3), 128 (7), 92 (4)
N-(phenylmethylene)phenethylamine
210 (1), 209 (5), 208 (3), 132 (7), 119 (9), 118 (100), 117 (6), 103 (4), 92 (7), 91 (95), 90 (6),
9 (7), 78 (4), 77 (11), 65 (11), 63 (4), 51 (7)
8
a
With [1-13C]glucose.
A. P yr id in e Der iva tives. Pyridines as a group
have exhibited mutagenic activity based on the Ames
and Williams tests (Sasaki et al., 1987). Two pyridine
derivatives, 3-phenylpyridine and 4-(phenylmethyl)-
pyridine, were identified in the model systems on the
basis of a spectral library search. 3-Phenylpyridine has
also been identified by Baltes and Mevissen (1988). In
addition, one of the major chromatographic peaks
designated X (molecular ion at m/z 231) in the pyrogram
of ARPP (see Figure 1) showed close similarity with 2,6-
diphenyl- and 3,4-diphenylpyridine mass spectra (see
Table 2). However, one of the common major peaks (m/z
F igu r e 1. Pyrogram of phenylalanine Amadori product
generated from the ribbon probe at 250 °C for 20 s. Pyranone
2
30) differed in relative intensity when compared with
the known diphenylpyridine spectra, indicating a dif-
ferent isomer that was tentatively assigned to 3,5-
diphenylpyridine structure. The two pyridine deriva-
tives, 3-phenylpyridine and 4-(phenylmethyl)pyridine,
and compound X were formed during pyrolysis of ARPP
on the ribbon probe at 250 °C, while at 150 °C only
compound X was formed (Table 3) and it increased in
intensity with increasing temperature (Table 4). Py-
rolysis of phenylalanine on the ribbon probe produced
compound X at all temperatures studied, whereas the
other two pyridine derivatives were formed only at 250
)
2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4(H)-pyran-4-one.
leads to the formation of components with benzyl and
phenyl residues as characteristic structural features
(
Kato et al., 1971). Py/GC/MS of phenylalanine on the
ribbon probe and in the quartz tube yields phenethyl-
amine as the main degradation product. No thermal
degradation products of phenylalanine were observed
below 200 °C. However, ARPP degraded at 150 °C and
exhibited a more complex product profile. The main
reaction products were phenylacetaldehyde (Strecker
aldehyde), styrene, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-
°
C. These observations indicate that the precursors of
compound X are readily formed from phenylalanine
compared to the precursors of the two other pyridine
derivatives.
4
(H)-pyran-4-one (pyranone), and three unknown com-
pounds designated X, Y, and Z (see Figure 1). In
addition, pyrazines were identified only in the ARPP
model systems. The identification of the Strecker
aldehyde and the pyrazines in the glucose/phenylalanine
model system and the similarity of the pyrograms of
ARPP and the glucose/phenylalanine mixture are in-
dicative of the efficiency of Amadori rearrangement
under pyrolysis conditions similar to the proline/glucose
system (Huyghues-Despointes et al., 1994). Formation
of phenylacetaldehyde from phenylalanine has been
reported at trace levels (Kato et al., 1971). Due to its
acidic R-hydrogens, phenylacetaldehyde is capable of
condensation reactions with other aldehydes such as
glycoladehyde to form 3-phenylfuran, as reported by
Baltes et al. (1988), and was also detected in our model
systems containing glucose, ribose, and glyceraldehyde.
Proposed Mechanism of Formation of 3,5-Diphenylpy-
ridine (Compound X) and 3-Phenylpyridine. Phenethyl-
amine can be formed by the decarboxylation of phenyl-
alanine. Phenylacetaldehyde, on the other hand, can
be formed through Strecker degradation, although it has
been detected in trace amounts in the absence of sugars
(Kato et al., 1971). These two compounds are known
to react to form an imine which rearranges into enamine
due to conjugation with the benzene ring (Figure 2). The
corresponding benzaldehyde adduct [N-(phenylmethyl-
ene)phenethylamine] was detected in the heated (10
min) methanolic solution of ARPP in 10% water (Table
2). If the above enamine reacts with another mole of
phenylacetaldehyde as an N-nucleophile, it eventually
leads to the formation of N-(2-phenethyl)-2,4-diphen-
ylpyrrole (Papadopoulou and Ames, 1994). However,
enamines can act as C-nucleophiles and undergo con-
densation reactions with other carbonyls such as phe-
nylacetaldehyde or acetaldehyde to produce 1 (Figure
2). Intermediate 1 can lose a styrene molecule as shown
in Figure 2 to produce the triene 2, which can undergo
1
3
Labeling experiments with [1- C]glucose indicated that
0% of the glycoaldehyde moiety in 3-phenylfuran
originates from C1-C2 of the sugar (see Table 2). 2-[5′-
Hydroxymethyl)-2′-formylpyrrol-1′-yl)-3-phenylpropi-
onic acid lactone reported by Kunert-Kirchhoff et al.
1990) was similarly observed in the model systems
containing glucose as the carbohydrate source.
7
(
(