Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Table 1: Volumetric thermal expansion coefficients, aV, of HC(NH2)2PbI3
and selected other compounds near room temperature.
cooling through the b–g transition, EPL blue-shifts substan-
tially, in agreement with existing reports.[12,13] This is similar to
the observed behavior at the tetragonal–orthorhombic tran-
sition in CH3NH3PbI3,[13] where the blue-shift arises from
reduced Pb–I orbital overlap due to the lowered symmetry,
though in HC(NH2)2PbI3 the blue-shift despite reduced tilting
suggests crystallographically hidden disorder of the Pb–I
network, though no disorder-induced emission broadening is
apparent.
Composition
Phase
T [K]
aV [10ꢀ6 Kꢀ1
]
Reference
HC(NH2)2PbI3
HC(NH2)2PbI3
CH3NH3PbI3
CsSnI3
Ag3[Co(CN)6]
Hg
b (solid)
a (solid)
b (solid)
g (solid)
solid
200–299
348–489
280
298
276
206–202
100–98.6
132
126
121
This work
This work
[19,20]
[21]
[22]
[21]
liquid
293
182
The static dielectric permittivity, er’, indirectly probes the
rotational freedom of the polar axis of the molecular
cation.[14] For the well-studied CH3NH3PbI3, er’ rises on
cooling in the tetragonal phase and drops abruptly through
the tetragonal–orthorhombic phase transition,[15] as the severe
tilting of the octahedra constrains the reorientation of the C–
N axis. In contrast, er’ for HC(NH2)2PbI3 has no discontinuity
and continues to rise on cooling in the g-phase (Figure 3c),
suggesting minimally inhibited reorientation of the polar axis.
The smaller value and reduced temperature dependence of er’
compared to that for CH3NH3PbI3 are consistent with the
smaller dipole moment for [HC(NH2)2]+. The persistence of
considerable cation motion in the g-phase is in line with our
previous observation of a glassy slowing of dynamics below
100 K in CH3NH3PbI3 and HC(NH2)2PbI3, with HC-
(NH2)2PbI3 exhibiting greater glass fragility.[5]
coefficient, aV, with those of other main-group halides and
selected framework materials and liquids is given in Table 1.
Fit over a temperature range of 200 K to 299 K, aV is greater
than 200 ꢁ 10ꢀ6 Kꢀ1 (R2 = 99.8%). Thus, aV for the b-phase is
larger than that for liquid mercury[21] and appears to be nearly
the largest for any extended crystalline solid near ambient
temperature. It was recently reported that aV = 220 ꢁ 10ꢀ6 Kꢀ1
for the mixed A-site [CH3NH3]0.5[HC(NH2)2]0.5PbI3, though
the precise temperature and fitting range are unspecified.[23]
In the b-phase, linear thermal expansion is ca. 60% greater in
the ab-plane (aa = 7.7 ꢁ 10ꢀ5 Kꢀ1) than in the c-direction (ac =
4.9 ꢁ 10ꢀ5 Kꢀ1), suggesting anisotropic mechanical properties.
While still large, aV is substantially reduced in the cubic a-
phase, consistent with a negative contribution from large
amplitude dynamic octahedral tilts as in A-site vacant
ReO3[16,17] and ScF3.[18]
The unit cell volume per formula unit, V, is given in
Figure 4a. A comparison of the volumetric thermal expansion
The isotropic ADP for Pb, Uiso, is given in Figure 4b, and
increases monotonically with temperature. While the value is
significantly elevated relative to typical values in oxides
(partially a consequence of 6s2 lone pair-induced anharmo-
nicity),[11] there are no discontinuities that would suggest
crystallographic Pb2+ displacements that are not captured in
our structure models for the low temperature phases.
The Pb-I-Pb octahedral tilt angle is given in Figure 4c, and
reflects the continuous a–b transition. In the g-phase, the tilt
angle jumps closer to linear, underscoring the unusual nature
of this transition.
ꢀ
Iodine ADPs in the directions orthogonal to the Pb I
bonds, U?, are given in Figure 4d. Consistent with thermally-
activated dynamic octahedral tilts, the values of U? decrease
monotonically on cooling in the a- and b-phases. However,
they increase significantly in the g-phase, again consistent
with disorder that is not captured by this crystallographic
model. The discrepancy between ADPs for the two distinct I
sites in the g-phase reflects parameter correlations that arise
from Bragg peak overlap.
Together, the photoluminescence, iodine ADPs, and
persistence of molecular motion in the g-phase suggest
complex (possibly modulated) disorder in this regime. This
is supported by the observation of weak (intensity < 0.5%
that of the strongest Bragg peak) diffuse scattering features
between Q = 1.55 ꢀꢀ1 and Q = 2.00 ꢀꢀ1 that are not indexed
by any plausible space group symmetry.[9,10] Nonetheless, the
pseudo-cubic unit cell is unambiguous, and underscores the
Figure 4. Selected crystallographic parameters for HC(NH2)2PbI3. Error
bars for (a)–(c) are smaller than the markers and are omitted. a) The
unit cell volume per formula unit, V, reveals unusually large volumetric
thermal expansion coefficients (aV =203ꢀ10ꢀ6 Kꢀ1 at 274 K). aV is
reduced in the cubic phase, consistent with a negative contribution
from large amplitude dynamic octahedral tilts.[16–18] b) The isotropic
ADP for Pb, Uiso, is large compared to typical values in oxides but
reveals no discontinuities associated with masked displacements in
the tetragonal phases. c) The Pb-I-Pb octahedral tilt angle reflects the
continuous a–b transition, and jumps back toward linear through the
unusual b–g transition. d) The ADPs for I in the directions orthogonal
ꢀ
to the Pb I bonds, U?, decline monotonically with cooling in the a-
ꢀ
different N H···I interactions between CH3NH3PbI3 and
and b-phases, consistent with reduced dynamic octahedral tilting. The
increased values of the U? ADPs on cooling to the g-phase suggest
disorder that is not fully captured by this crystallographic model.
HC(NH2)2PbI3, where the diamine may hydrogen-bond to
halogens on both sides of the cage.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 6
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!