SHORT COMMUNICATION
using an ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermofisher LTQ). Negative
mode was chosen for the experiments (capillary voltage 33 V). Sam-
ple solution (in acetonitrile) was infused into the ESI source at a
flow rate of 300 μLmin–1.
respectively. By using the linear equation, the precise amount of
each substance could be calculated at different times.
Acknowledgments
Synthesis of (NBu4)4[Mo6O17(NO)2] (1): A mixture of (NBu4)4-
[Mo8O26] (2.16 g, 1 mmol), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (0.184 g,
2.67 mmol), tetrabutylammonium bromide (0.428 g, 1.33 mmol),
and DCC (0.687 g, 3.33 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous acetoni-
trile (50 mL) and then allows to react at room temperature for
about 4 h. Then, the reaction solution was filtered to remove the
white 1,3-dicyclohexylurea (DCU) precipitate, and a dark-brown
solution was obtained; then, the filtrate was poured into ether,
which resulted in precipitation. After the solution cleared, the su-
pernatant liquid was poured off. The solid depositing in the bottom
of the beaker was redissolved in acetone and filtered to remove a
large amount of unreacted octamolybdate. The acetone was al-
lowed to slowly evaporate, the product deposited from the filtrate
as a black cubic solid. After recrystallization (acetone and aceto-
nitrile = 1:2, 10 mL), the title compound could be obtained as a
black crystalline products (60% yield based on Mo).
C64H144N6Mo6O19 (1877.52): calcd. H 7.73, C 40.94, N 4.48, O
16.19, Mo 30.66; found H 7.78, C 40.95, N 4.46, O 16.21, Mo
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Sci-
ence Foundation of China (NSFC) (grant number 91022010).
[1] R. M. J. Palmer, A. G. Ferrige, S. Moncada, Nature 1987, 327,
524.
[2] M. A. Marletta, Trends Biochem. Sci. 1989, 14, 488–492.
[3] P. G. Parzuchowski, M. C. Frost, M. E. Meyerhoff, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12182–12191.
[4] B. Wu, B. Gerlitz, B. W. Grinnell, M. E. Meyerhoff, Biomateri-
als 2007, 28, 4047–4055.
[5] F. De Rosa, M. R. Kibbe, S. F. Najjar, M. L. Citro, L. K.
Keefer, J. A. Hrabie, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3786–3787.
[6] H. P. Zhang, G. M. Annich, J. Miskulin, K. Stankiewicz, K.
Osterholzer, S. I. Merz, R. H. Bartlett, M. E. Meyerhoff, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5015–5024.
[7] J. H. Shin, M. H. Schoenfisch, Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 239–
249.
[8] P. S. Wheatley, A. R. Butler, M. S. Crane, S. Fox, B. Xiao, A. G.
Rossi, I. L. Megson, R. E. Morris, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 502–509.
30.65. UV/Vis (MeCN): λmax = 338 nm. IR (KBr pellet): ν = 2961,
˜
2874, 1663, 1568 1383, 962, 939, 885, 787 cm–1. MS (MeCN, ESI):
m/z
=
226.52 [Mo6O17(NO)2]4– (calcd. 226.91), 575.65
[9] a) K. D. Kroncke, C. V. Suschek, J. InVest. Dermatol. 2008,
128, 258–260; b) M. Mowbray, X. J. Tan, P. S. Wheatley, R. E.
Morris, R. B. Weller, J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 352–360;
c) N. J. Hinks, A. C. McKinlay, B. Xiao, P. S. Wheatley, R. E.
Morris, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 129, 330–334.
[10] I. V. Kozhevnikov, Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 171–198.
[11] J. T. Rhule, C. L. Hill, D. A. Judd, Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 327–
357.
[12] Y. P. Jeannin, Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 51–76.
[13] E. Coronado, P. Day, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 5419–5422.
[14] M. Sadakane, E. Steckhan, Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 219–237.
[15] W. H. Knoth, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 759–760.
[16] F. Zonnevijlle, M. T. Pope, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 2731–
2732.
(Bu4N)[H+][Mo6O17(NO)2]2– (calcd. 575.55), 1393.68 (Bu4N)2-
[H+][Mo6O17(NO)2]– (calcd. 1393.58).
X-ray Crystallographic Structural Determinations:
single crystal having approximate dimensions
A
suitable
of
0.550ϫ0.415ϫ0.355 mm3 was selected. Data collection was per-
formed at 100 K by using graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα radia-
tion (λ = 0.71073 Å). Data reduction, cell refinement, and experi-
mental absorption correction were performed with the software
package of Rigaku RAPID AUTO (Rigaku, 1998, version 2.30).
Structures were solved by direct methods and refined against F2
by full-matrix least-squares. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined
anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were generated geometrically. All
calculations were carried out by the program package of
SHELXTL version 5.1.[27]
[17] J. B. Strong, G. P. A. Yap, R. Ostrander, L. M. Liable-Sands,
A. L. Rheingold, R. Thouvenot, P. Gouzerh, E. A. Maatta, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 639–649.
[18] A. Proust, R. Thouvenot, M. Chaussade, F. Robert, P. Gouz-
erh, Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994, 224, 81–95.
CCDC-923001 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
for this compound. These data can be obtained free of charge from
The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.
ac.uk/data_request/cif.
[19] W. Clegg, R. J. Errington, K. A. Fraser, S. A. Holmes, A.
Schäfer, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 455–456.
[20] Y. G. Wei, B. Xu, C. L. Barnes, Z. H. Peng, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 4083–4084.
NO Releasing Test: The mononitrosyl-substituted compound of
(NBu4)3[Mo6O18(ϵNO)] was first synthesized according to the pro-
tocol presented by Proust[22] before the UV spectroscopy test. Ac-
cording to Lambert–Beer’s law, the absorbance of a solution has
a simple linear relationship with its concentration. Thus, through
making the standard working curve of the absorbance of
(NBu4)4[Mo6O17(ϵNO)2], (NBu4)3[Mo6O18(ϵNO)], and (NBu4)2-
[Mo6O19] versus different concentrations, the linear equation of the
absorbance of these compounds with their concentrations can be
simply obtained (Figure 7).
[21] J. Zhang, F. P. Xiao, J. Hao, Y. G. Wei, Dalton Trans. 2012, 41,
3599–3615.
[22] P. Gouzerh, Y. Jeannin, A. Proust, F. Robert, Angew. Chem.
1989, 101, 1377; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 1363–
1364.
[23] A. Proust, F. Robert, P. Gouzerh, Q. Chen, J. Zubieta, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3523–3535.
[24] J. B. Strong, R. Ostrander, A. L. Rheingold, E. A. Maatta, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3601–3602.
[25] X. D. Liu, Y. Q. Qiu, S. L. Sun, C. G. Liu, Z. M. Su, J. Theor.
Comput. Chem. 2010, 9, 219–223.
[26] L. Xu, M. Lu, B. B. Xu, Y. G. Wei, Z. H. Peng, D. R. Powell,
Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 4303; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002,
41, 4129–4132.
[27] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 2008, 64, 112–122.
[28] C. L. Lv, J. J. Hu, H. Zhou, Z. Li, R. N. N. Khan, Y. G. Wei,
Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 8681–8691.
[29] L. S. Wang, L. Zhu, P. C. Yin, W. W. Fu, J. K. Chen, J. Hao,
F. P. Xiao, C. L. Lv, J. Zhang, L. Shi, Q. Li, Y. G. Wei, Inorg.
Chem. 2009, 48, 9222–9235.
Preparation of Buffer Solutions: The concentrations of both the
Na2HPO4 and KH2PO4 solutions were 1/15 m. For the preparation
of pH 7.1 buffer solutions, 72 mL of Na2HPO4 and 28 mL of
KH2PO4 were mixed together, whereas for the preparation of
pH 8.2 buffer solutions, 95.8 mL of Na2HPO4 and 4.2 mL of
KH2PO4 were mixed together. The compound was removed from
the simulated body fluid by extraction and dissolved in acetonitrile
and then tested for the characteristic absorbance of (NBu4)4-
[Mo6O17(ϵNO)2], (NBu4)3[Mo6O18(ϵNO)], and (NBu4)2[Mo6O19],
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 1664–1671
1670
© 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim