Inorganic Chemistry
Article
experiment. The change in absorbance at 409 nm with time was
exponential at all ferrylMb concentrations (Figure 6a), and
plots of kobs vs [ferrylMb] were linear (Figure 6b), showing that
the reaction was first-order in [ferrylMb] and second-order
overall. The true second-order rate constant for the reaction
outcome of the simulations, given the reaction conditions being
modeled. This leaves k , k , k , k , and k as parameters that
4
5
8
−8
9
could significantly affect the predicted time evolution of
[ferrylMb].
The parameters k , k , k , k , and k all govern the fate of the
4
5
8
−8
9
7
−1 −1
was calculated to be (1.4 ± 0.1) × 10 M
s
from the slope
NO that putatively escapes the protein cage. Any increase in
2
of the Figure 6b line, a value that is close to that previously
reported in the literature for the reaction between NO and
the ratio k /k will lead to greater net recombination of
5
4
ferrylMb with NO , thus decreasing the final amounts of both
2
35
ferrylMb (Scheme 3).
The agreement between the rate constant calculated from
species. However, in practice it would take a huge error in the
literature derived value of this ratio (0.267 from Scheme 3) to
have any significant effect on ferrylMb survival under the
reaction conditions being modeled, where at all times the
oxyMb concentration far exceeded any ferrylMb that might be
35
Figure 6b and that reported earlier by Herold and Rehman
demonstrates that NO is the fastest reducing agent present in
photolyzed mixtures of ferrylMb and 1. If it were not, the rate
constant calculated from Figure 6b would have been higher
than Herold and Rehman’s. The close agreement does not,
generated. Thus, for example, if the value of k is decreased to 5
4
6
−1 −1
8
−1 −1
× 10 M
s
and that for k
is increased to 10 M
s
(both
5
+
however, exclude the possibility that Mn(PaPy Q)H O also
these numbers are well outside the reported uncertainties for
the respective parameters), a simulation still predicts the
2
2
reduces ferrylMb at rates comparable to or lower than NO. To
address this possible alternative, the amount of ferrylMb
reduced and the amount of NO generated by photolysis of a
given amount of 1 were determined independently, in a set of
experiments that are described in Supporting Information. In
these experiments, only one equivalent of ferrylMb was reduced
per equivalent of 1 photolyzed, which shows that NO is the
presence of ∼10 μM ferrylMb 10 ms after the laser pulse. A k
5
8
−1 −1
value of 10 M
s
for the ferrylMb reaction with NO
would
2
make it by far the largest known rate constant for the reaction
1
4
6
−1
of NO
s
with a biomolecule, while the k
would be at the low end of values reported for the
interaction of small gas molecules with either oxyMb or
value of 5 × 10 M
2
4
−1
8
,14,42,43
sole reducing agent generated in the photolysis. If Mn-
Mb.
And yet, much greater changes in the input rate
+
(
PaPy Q)H O were also capable of reducing ferrylMb on
constants would be needed to decrease the ferrylMb
concentration below 1−2 μM (the estimated detection limit
for these experiments).
2
2
the subsecond time scale, two equivalents of ferrylMb would
have been reduced per equivalent of 1 photolyzed in these
experiments. Therefore, in the experiments in which solutions
of oxyMb and 1 were irradiated to generate NO, free ferrylMb
generated by homolytic fragmentation of a metMb(OONO)
intermediate should have still been present 16 ms after
photolysis, and thus detectable.
The processes governed by k
at which NO is consumed independently of ferrylMb. The
value of k for the reaction of NO with NO is at the diffusion
limit and so is unlikely to be underestimated. However, if k−8 is
, k−8, and k determine the rate
8
9
2
8
2
overestimated and/or k is underestimated in Scheme 3, then
9
all else being equal the Figure 2 analysis would be
overestimating the amount of ferrylMb that is eventually
Evaluation of the Scheme 3 Model. Given that ferrylMb
was not generated in detectable quantities in the present
experiments, contrary to the predictions of earlier reports as
outlined in Scheme 3, it is now necessary to assess the
sensitivity of the Scheme 3 conclusions to possible errors in the
published kinetic parameters. One question that immediately
arises is whether Su and Groves could have overestimated the
amount of cage escape (Scheme 1) that occurred in their
experiments; the values of k and k12 in Scheme 3 are based
generated by reaction of NO with oxyMb. Note however that
2
even in the extreme case whereby none of the NO resulted in
2
additional ferrylMb formation, one would still see the 10%
ferrylMb generated by the initial NO cage escape, if this were
2
occurring.
To summarize, even if one assumes much larger uncertainties
in the kinetic parameters of Scheme 3 than are provided with
the literature values, ferrylMb is predicted to accumulate to
concentrations 5−10 times above the detection limit in the
experiments presented herein, if the reactions of oxyMb with
NO and metMb with peroxynitrite share a common metMb-
1
1
19
directly on this estimate. When the numerical simulation that
they used to obtain the k /k estimate of 10 was repeated, this
r
e
estimate was found to be very insensitive to even large
variations in the inputted initial concentrations of metMb and
peroxynitrite. Therefore, Su and Groves’ estimate for initial
ferrylMb generation via cage escape cannot be very far off.
Next to be examined were the possible effects that
uncertainties in the Scheme 3 rate constants might have on
the predicted time evolution of the ferrylMb concentration. Of
all the parameters in Scheme 3, the one with the greatest
(
OONO) intermediate, as proposed in Scheme 1.
DISCUSSION
■
Investigations by the Groves group and others over the past
decade have shown fairly convincingly that, during metMb-
catalyzed isomerization of peroxynitrite, some nitration of
reported uncertainty is k , for which the literature value is given
Tyr103 from the metMb takes place, and ferrylMb builds up as
6
4
−1 −1
7
−1 −1 14
12,17,19
as a range (10 M
that yielded Figure 2, the upper bound was arbitrarily chosen
Supporting Information), but a smaller value of k is unlikely
s
to 10 M s ). For the calculations
a transient but detectable intermediate.
These results are
consistent with the mechanism of Scheme 1 path 2, whereby
peroxynitrite first binds the Fe heme center to produce a
metMb(OONO) intermediate, which then rapidly cleaves
homolytically to form ferrylMb and caged NO . The NO
(
6
+
•
to change the conclusions; if ferrylMb reacts more slowly
with oxyMb, then it is almost certainly still converted to
ferrylMb by other competing processes, such as reduction by
ascorbate.
2
2
can then either recombine with the ferrylMb to release nitrate,
or escape the cage; the latter path gives rise to the ferrylMb that
is transiently detectable, and to the observed Tyr103 nitration.
In an early report, the extent of cage escape was estimated to be
The fact that (k + k ) and k are within 20% of the
11
12
2
8
,35
reported values was independently verified herein (Support-
ing Information and Figure 6). Of the remaining parameters, k3
17
as high as 20%, but this was later revised downward to
19
and k prove to be too small to have any real impact on the
∼10%.
7
G
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic400697a | Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX