A. Olbert-Majkut et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 656 (2003) 321–332
331
The relative yield of the HOCO radicals and
Acknowledgements
HOC(O)NO molecules was dependent on the
conditions of the experiment (temperature of
deposition, matrix temperature during photolysis
process) however both species were always
detected. In contrast with the CO· · ·HONO system
after photolysis of the C2H4· · ·HONO complex only
2-nitrosoethanol molecule, which is the product of
double addition reaction, was detected. The spectra
of 2-hydroxyethyl radical are well known, [3,4] no
band characteristic for this radical was detected in
our spectra. There are two possible reasons which
could explain different behavior of these two
systems. First, the 2-hydroxyethyl radical, CH2
OHCH2, is more reactive than hydroxy formyl
radical, HOCO, so, once it is formed it reacts
readily with the NO radical present in the same
matrix cage to form 2-nitrosoethanol molecule.
Second, one perhaps should take into account the
possibility that the C2H4· · ·HONO complex does
not dissociate completely and as a transition state a
cyclic intermediate is formed.
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial
support from the Polish State Committee for Scientific
Research (grant KBN no 5439611). A.O.M. gratefully
acknowledges the Wrocław Supercomputer Center for
providing the computer time and facilities.
References
[1] B.J. Finlayson-Pitts, J.N. Pitts Jr., Atmospheric Chemistry:
Fundamentals and Experimental Techniques, Wiley, New
York, 1986, Part IV, pp. 405–507, references cited therein.
[2] R. Atkinson, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 26 (1997) 215.
[3] Y.-P. G, H. Wann, Y.-P. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 99 (1993) 3272.
[4] E.J. Feltham, M.J. Almond, G. Marston, K.S. Wiltshire, N.
Goldberg, Spectrochim. Acta A 56 (2000) 2589.
[5] M. Krajewska, Z. Mielke, K.G. Tokhadze, J. Mol. Struct. 404
(1997) 47.
[6] R.A. Cox, R.G. Derwent, J. Photochem. (1976/1977) 23.
[7] Z. Mielke, A. Olbert-Majkut, K.G. Tokhadze, J. Chem. Phys.
118 (2003) 1364.
[8] Gmelins Handbuch der Anorganischen Chemie; Verlag
Chemie: Leipzig-Berlin, vol. 23, 1955, p. 85.
[9] A. Olbert-Majkut, PhD thesis, 2001, University of Wrocław,
Poland.
[10] N. Acquista, L.J. Schoen, D.R. Lide Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 48
(1968) 1534.
5. Conclusions
[11] S. Su
¨zer, L. Andrews, J. Chem. Phys. 88 (1988) 916.
[12] V.S. Langford, A.J. McKinley, T.I. Quickenden, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 122 (2000) 12859.
We have shown that the photolysis of the
C2H4· · ·HONO complex trapped in argon matrices
with l . 340 nm radiation leads to the formation
of 2-nitrosoethanol molecule that has been ident-
ified for the first time. Three conformers of 2-
nitrosoethanol molecule are formed whereas ab
initio calculations predict eight stable conformers
of this molecule. The conformers produced in
photochemical reaction were identified tentatively
as the most stable conformer with synclinal
orientation of the CO and CN bonds and intramo-
lecular hydrogen bond between OH and NO groups
(S1) and two less stable conformers with antiper-
iplanar orientations of the CO and CN bonds (A1
and A2). The experimental results are supported by
ab initio calculations of the geometries, energies
and vibrational frequencies of the eight conformers.
The 2-hydroxyethyl radical has not been identified
in the studied spectra.
[13] M.E. Jacox, W.E. Thompson, J. Chem. Phys. 93 (1990) 7609.
[14] R. Kometer, F. Legay, N. Legay-Sommaire, N. Schwentner,
J. Chem. Phys. 100 (1994) 8737.
[15] F. Legay, N. Legay-Sommaire, Chem. Phys. Lett. 211 (1993)
516.
[16] Z. Mielke, Z. Latajka, A. Olbert-Majkut, R. Wieczorek,
J. Phys. Chem. 104 (2000) 3764.
[17] R.M. Bentwood, A.J. Barnes, W.J. Orville-Thomas, J. Mol.
Spectrosc. 84 (1980) 391.
[18] (a) G.P. Ayers, A.D.E. Pullin, Spectrochim. Acta A 32 (1976)
1629. (b) G.P. Ayers, A.D.E. Pullin, Spectrochim. Acta A 32
(1976) 1689. (c) G.P. Ayers, A.D.E. Pullin, Spectrochim. Acta
A 32 (1976) 1695.
[19] (a) D.E. Milligan, M.E. Jacox, J. Chem. Phys. 38 (1963) 2627.
(b) M.E. Jacox, D.E. Milligan, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 42 (1972)
495.
[20] E.T. Arakowa, A.H. Nielsen, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 2 (1958) 413.
[21] R. Louis St, B. Crawford Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 42 (1965) 857.
[22] E.L. Varetti, G.C. Pimentel, J. Chem. Phys. 55 (1971) 3813.
[23] T.G. Koch, J.R. Sodeau, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 92
(1996) 2347.
[24] C.I. Lee, Y.P. Lee, X. Wang, Q.Z. Quin, J. Chem. Phys. 109
(1998) 10446.