A R T I C L E S
Madsen et al.
the N-O bonds, and breaking of N-O bonds is expected to
ensue.10,11 However, the dissociation processes following the
photoexcitation of aqueous nitrate have had a history of
considerable controversy over the past 35 years. Early photolysis
studies by Daniels et al.16 suggested that excitation in the n f
π* band at 300 nm results in the two primary product channels:
NO3- + hν f NO2- + O
•NO2 + •O-
(1)
(2)
The primary formation of •NO2 was also reported by Barat et
al.8 and Shuali et al.7 upon excitation of the π f π* band,
-
whereas the same studies suggested that NO2 arises from
secondary reactions and not from the direct photodissociation
process (eq 1). These findings were later contested by Bayliss
and Bucat,17 who, on the basis of the excitation studies of both
Figure 1. Absorption spectra of the species potentially involved in the
primary photolysis of aqueous nitrate.
-
the n f π* and the π f π* transition, concluded that NO2
The femtosecond transient absorption measurements presented
in this work produce direct evidence for peroxynitrite formation
by photoisomerization of nitrate within the solvent cage. The
measurements also reveal that the formation of peroxynitrite is
(eq 1) rather than •NO2 (eq 2) is the primary photodissociation
process. Still, more recent steady-state photolysis experiments
performed at 254 nm (right at the intersection of the π f π*
and n f π* absorption bands) indicate that •NO2 + •O- is the
dominant dissociation channel with a quantum yield of 9%,
while NO2 is produced in much smaller yields of less than
0.1%.4 Hence, it appears the photodissociation channels of
aqueous nitrate are not well-established.
accompanied by a minor yield of •O2 or NO-. In contrast,
-
-
-
neither NO2 nor •NO2 is identified among the primary
photolysis products. Apart from unveiling the primary photo-
kinetics of nitrate, the transient absorption measurements offer
a rare opportunity to follow the constitutional isomerization and
vibrational relaxation of small molecular ions.
In addition to photodissociation, numerous photochemical
investigations have shown that, upon excitation of the π f π*
band, the nitrate ion can isomerize to peroxynitrite:6-8
The present investigation of the nitrate photolysis is based
on femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy, which identi-
fies the species involved in the photodynamics by their steady-
state absorption spectra, depicted in Figure 1. The spectrum of
NO3-(aq) peaks at 200 nm with an extinction coefficient of ꢀ
) 9900 M-1 cm-1, while NO2-(aq) has a maximum extinction
coefficient of ꢀ ) 5500 M-1 cm-1 at 210 nm.3,28 •NO2(aq) and
NO3- + hν f ONOO-
(3)
This photoisomerization could occur directly or by recombina-
tion of primary photoproducts. Considering the latter possibility,
formation of peroxynitrate could in principle occur through
reaction of •NO2 and •O-. However, experiments using high
concentrations of •O- scavengers have deemed this reaction
•O-(aq) both have weak absorption bands (ꢀ < 250 M-1 cm-1
)
with maxima at 400 and 240 nm, respectively,29-31 whereas
the oxygen atom produced in reaction 1 does not absorb within
the spectral range probed. •NO(aq) absorbs only weakly in the
UV-vis region, while its anion, NO-(aq), absorbs below 300
nm and has an extinction coefficient of 1200 M-1 cm-1 at 260
nm.32 Finally, peroxynitrite potentially exists as planar cis- and
trans-isomers. The absorption band of cis-peroxinitrite is
centered at 302 nm with a maximum extinction coefficient of
channel insignificant.4 Likewise, ONOO- may be formed
through reaction of NO- + O2
or by the radical reaction
18-20
-
•NO + •O2 f ONOO-.21-25 So far, however, neither of the
reactants involved in these processes have been identified as
primary products of the aqueous nitrate photolysis. On the other
hand, steady-state photolysis studies of aqueous nitrate,4 am-
monium nitrate,26 and potassium nitrate27 films suggest that
peroxynitrite is formed by direct photoisomerization. These
findings are supported by resonant Raman spectroscopy of the
π f π* excitation, which indicates that excited-state aqueous
nitrate is pyramidal, thus bringing the oxygen atoms closer
together and facilitating the ONOO- formation.11,17
1670 M-1 cm-1 24,33,34 trans-ONOO- has not been observed in
.
aqueous solution, but guided by measurements and calcula-
tions on KOONO in solid Ar-matrices, we estimate that the
absorption spectrum of trans-ONOO-(aq) is shifted toward
longer wavelengths by ∼50 nm relative to that of the cis-
isomer.35,36 The extinction coefficient of trans-ONOO- has not
been determined.
(16) Daniels, M.; Meyers, R. V.; Belardo, E. V. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 389-
399.
(17) Bayliss, N. S.; Bucat, R. B. Aust. J. Chem. 1975, 28, 1865-1878.
(18) Donald, C. E.; Hughes, M. N.; Thompson, J. M.; Bonner, F. T. Inorg.
Chem. 1986, 25, 2676-2677.
(28) Fischer, M.; Warneck, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 18749-18756.
(29) Lymar, S. V.; Schwartz, H. A.; Czapski, G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106,
7245-7250.
(19) Hughes, M. N.; Nicklin, H. G. J. Chem. Soc. A 1971, 164-171.
(20) Hughes, M. N.; Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1411, 263-272.
(21) Beckman, J. S.; Beckman, T. W.; Chen, J.; Marshall, P. A.; Freeman, B.
A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990, 87, 1620-1624.
(30) Gra¨tzel, M. V.; Henglein, A.; Lilie, J.; Beck, G. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys.
Chem. 1969, 73, 646-653.
(22) Goldstein, S.; Czapski, G. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1995, 19, 505-510.
(23) Huie, R. E.; Padmaje, S. Free Radical Res. Commun. 1993, 18, 195-199.
(24) Kissner, R.; Nauser, T.; Bugnon, P.; Lye, P. G.; Koppenol, W. H. Chem.
Res. Toxicol. 1997, 10, 1285-1292.
(31) Rabani, J. AdV. Chem. Ser. 1968, 81, 131-152.
(32) Seddon, W. A.; Fletcher, J. W.; Sopchyshyn, F. C. Can. J. Chem. 1973,
51, 1123-1130.
(33) Løgager, T.; Sehested, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 6664-6669.
(34) Hughes, M. N.; Nicklin, H. G. J. Chem. Soc. A 1968, 450-452.
(35) Lo, W.-J.; Lee, Y.-P.; Tsai, J.-H. M.; Beckman, J. S. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1995, 242, 147-152.
(25) Blough, N. V.; Zafiriou, O. C. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 3504-3505.
(26) Koch, T. G.; Holmes, N. S.; Roddis, T. B.; Sodeau, J. R. J. Phys. Chem.
1996, 100, 11402-11407.
(27) Plumb, R. C.; Edwards, J. O. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 3245-3247.
(36) Krauss, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 222, 513-516.
9
15572 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 50, 2003