ELUCIDATION OF THE SURPRISING ROLE OF NO
645
The rate of oxygen desorption from the catalyst sur-
In view of the results presented in this paper, various
face is greatly enhanced by NO addition. Indeed, a sig- pathway(s) are needed to explain the catalytic effect of
nificant increase was found in the amount of oxygen NO on N O decomposition. The different experimental
2
formed if NO was added to the N O-containing feed observations are depicted in the scheme. The transitions
2
(
Fig. 11), and only a relatively small amount of NO is of the different structures considered (A–D) are also
needed to dramatically increase the N O decomposition considered in the reaction mechanism. Initially, N O
2
2
rate (Fig. 2). Although during this process NO is reacts on a vacant site, yielding N and leaving an oxi-
2
2
formed, even beyond the thermodynamic equilibrium dized site (reaction (I')). On the catalyst, a substantial
between NO, O , and NO according to Eq. (VI) (see amount of adsorbed NO is present, as observed by
2
2
Fig. 3), the enhanced oxygen production strongly sug- in situ FT-IR. Due to the absence of inhibition by NO in
gests a catalytic effect of NO. If Eq. (II) were the only the activity tests and the fact that no NO signal appears
promotion route induced by the addition of NO, a pro- at the time of the N O pulse in the Multitrack experi-
2
gressive increase in conversion upon increasing the ments, it is concluded that the NO adsorption and N O
2
inlet NO partial pressure would be expected. This is not decomposition do not compete for the same site, so
the case: the promotion occurs already at relatively low both processes occur at different Fe-species (light and
substoichiometric amounts of NO, indicating the cata- dark solid gray areas). Adsorption of N O (like Oᮀ)
2
lytic nature, and reaches a limiting value at increasing and NO in two open coordinations at the same iron site
molar NO/N O feed ratios up to 10. This suggests the seems hardly probable, since dinitrosyls were not iden-
2
involvement of NO adsorption and that the sites where tified by infrared studies in this system [Oᮀ]. As previ-
NO is adsorbed are not in competition with N O ously discussed, the production of NO shown in reac-
2
2
decomposition sites. Competitive adsorption would tion (II') is certainly not the major mode of promotion,
have resulted in inhibition, especially at high partial although it cannot be completely excluded in the reac-
NO pressures. From the observation that at 698 K only tion network. In Fe-zeolite catalysts, N O activation
2
four NO pulses are needed to restore the promotion occurs next to an adsorbed *NO molecule. At these
effect, from the pulse size and the amount of catalyst temperatures (550–700 K), the oxidized site (O) subse-
used, and assuming that all NO adsorbed at Fe sites, it quently oxidizes adsorbed NO to adsorbed NO (reac-
2
can be calculated that less than 0.9% of the Fe present tion (III')), yielding structure C in the scheme. Subse-
is involved in the promotion. This suggests that a very quently, NO desorption is induced by adsorption of
2
low fraction of Fe is active in the reaction.
NO (reaction (IV')), as was observed from the Multi-
track experiments by the presence of a NO signal at the
To explain the enhancement of the é desorption
2
2
time of the NO pulse. This closes the catalytic cycle in
rate at the time of the N O pulse, an adsorbed species
2
the conversion of N O and NO to N and NO at lower
formed at the time of the NO pulse needs to be
involved. The amount of adsorbed NO will be reduced
at high temperatures, while oxygen desorption at high
temperatures already proceeds fast. This adsorption
involvement is supported by the slower decay of the
NO promotion at lower temperatures in the dual-pulse
Multitrack experiments after NO pulsing is stopped.
Sang and Lund [8] used the interconversion of nitrates
and nitrites (Eqs. (IV), (V) in Introduction) to explain
2
2
2
temperatures. This is in excellent agreement with the
transient FT-IR/MS experiments, where NO formation
2
is observed upon switching from N O to NO.
2
Different options can be proposed to explain the
enhanced oxygen formation. Again N O activation
2
occurs next to an adsorbed NO molecule, yielding
structure B in the scheme. Subsequently, a second N O
2
molecule reacts with the site, yielding N and O (reac-
2
2
the enhancement of N O conversion by NO. However,
2
tion (V')), and structure A is regenerated. The enhanced
oxygen desorption from the active center has been
ascribed to a reduced stability of adsorbed oxygen,
induced by either electronic or steric effects of the NO
in the infrared analysis of ex-FeZSM-5, nitrate bands
have never been observed but only adsorbed NO and
NO species (Figs. 6, 8).
2
The Multitrack experiments clearly show that oxy- adsorbed on neighboring oxidized sites. A more plausi-
gen desorption is triggered at the time of the N O pulse ble explanation for the enhanced oxygen desorption is
2
and not at the time of the NO pulse. NO formation is reaction (VI'). The increased N O decomposition is
2
2
observed at the time of the NO pulse, indicating dis- simply explained by the recombination of oxygen
placement of adsorbed NO by NO as confirmed by present in adsorbed NO and oxygen species deposited
2
2
transient in situ FT-IR/MS experiments. In the Multi- by N O on a neighboring site. Alternatively, O forma-
2
2
track formation of O , NO is decoupled: NO is mainly tion from NO , via reaction (VI'), requires competition
2
2
2
2
released due to displacement by NO and probably by between N O and NO to oxidize a vacant ᮀ-site. If
2
2
thermal desorption, while O is formed during the N O N O is a more efficient oxidizer of these sites, NO lev-
2
2
2
2
pulses. If NO decomposition, as presented in Fig. 5, els beyond the thermodynamic equilibrium of Eq. (VI)
2
contributed significantly to O2 formation, an O2 are indeed feasible. Thus, the adsorbed NO serves to
response would have been expected at the time of the accommodate temporarily the deposited oxygen from
NO pulse, rather than at the time of the N O pulse only. the N O, freeing the neighboring site for deposition of
2
2
This excludes the possibility that Eq. (III) is the only a second oxygen. This would imply the presence of
reason for the promotion effect.
remote sites for the N O decomposition. Consequently,
2
KINETICS AND CATALYSIS Vol. 44 No. 5 2003