Communications
added, all the hydroxy proton signals disappeared and the
aromatic region gave sharp, clean signals at d = 7.68 (d, J =
aldehydes and, especially, is the most enantioselective catalyst
for linear aliphatic aldehydes. Unlike other catalysts devel-
oped for the addition of diphenylzinc—which often require
the addition of a significant amount of diethylzinc with
cooling (or heating) the reaction mixture to ensure high
enantioselectivity—the use of (S)-4 avoids the need for
additive and gives excellent results at room temperature.
7
7
.2 Hz, 2H); 7.55 (s, 1H); 7.48 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H); 7.27 (t, J =
.2 Hz, 2H); 7.20 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H); 7.18–7.10 (m, over-
lapping with the free benzene signal); 6.56 (s, 1H); 6.47 (s,
H); 6.45 ppm (s, 1H). On the basis of gradient double-
1
quantum-filtered (gDQ-COSY) and gradient heteronuclear
single-quantum (gHSQC) correlation spectroscopy experi-
ments, this complexwas characterized as a [2 +3] complex
The one-step synthesis of this ligand from H -binol and the
8
mild asymmetric reaction conditions make this chiral catalyst
practically useful for general synthesis. The NMR study has
also revealed a few interesting mechanistic characteristics of
this catalytic process.
containing two H -binol ligands, three Zn centers, and a total
8
of two phenyl groups on the Zn atoms. The four singlets in the
aromatic region were assigned to the aromatic protons of two
unsymmetrical H -binol ligands. The two doublets, two
8
triplets, and the multiplet were assigned to the two unsym-
Received: September 8, 2005
Published online: November 29, 2005
1
3
metrical phenyl groups on the Zn centers. The C NMR
spectrum of this compound displayed sixdownfield singlets at
d = 160.1, 158.5, 157.1, 156.7, 156.0 and 154.8 ppm: four were
assigned to the aryl carbon atoms bearing the oxygen atom in
the two unsymmetrical ligands and two are due to the ipso
phenyl carbon atom connected to the Zn atom in the {ZnPh}
Keywords: alcohols · aldehydes · asymmetric synthesis ·
.
nucleophilic addition · zinc
[
21]
[1] D. Seebach, A. K. Beck, S. Roggo, A. Wonnacott, Chem. Ber.
units. Compound 6 in Scheme 2 is proposed as a possible
structures for the [2+3] complexgenerated from the reaction
of diphenylzinc with the proposed [1+1] complex 5.
1985, 118, 3673 – 3682.
[
2] R. Noyori, S. Suga, K. Kawai, S. Okada, M. Kitamura, Pure
Appl. Chem. 1988, 60, 1597 – 1606.
Addition of trimethylacetaldehyde to the above [1+1] or
[
3] M. Nakajima, K. Tomioka, K. Koga, Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 9751 –
9758.
[
2+3] complexseparately showed no reaction. This demon-
strates that the phenyl group in the {ZnPh} units of 5 and 6
cannot migrate to the aldehyde. With the addition of up to
[4] J.-T. Wang, X. Fan, X. Feng, Y.-M. Qian, Synthesis 1989, 291 –
92.
5] M. Kaino, K. Ishihara, H. Yamamoto, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
989, 62, 3736 – 3738.
2
[
1
2 equivalents (with respect to (S)-4) of diphenylzinc in the
1
absence of the aldehyde, the [2+3] complexprobably
dissociated completely to form a compound that may contain
[
[
6] B. Weber, D. Seebach, Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 7473 – 7484.
7] M. Sakai, M. Ueda, N. Miyaura, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 3475 –
3477; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3279 – 3281.
only one H -binol ligand and multiple coordinated {ZnPh }
8
2
1
units. Its H NMR spectrum showed only one singlet at d =
.65 ppm for the aromatic hydrogen atom of the ligand,
[8] a) C. Bolm, M. Kesselgruber, A. Grenz, N. Hermanns, J. P.
Hildebrand, New J. Chem. 2001, 25, 13 – 15; b) J. Rudolph, F.
Schmidt, C. Bolm, Synthesis 2005, 840 – 842; c) C. Bolm, J.
Rudolph, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14850 – 14851.
6
indicating the formation of a C -symmetric complexas
2
represented by 7. The conversion of 6 into 7 may involved a
metathesis process between diphenylzinc and the zinc center
in 6 that contains no phenyl group to form the monophenyl-
ated zinc centers in 7. Addition of trimethylacetaldehyde to
this compleximmediately led to phenyl migration to the
[
9] a) J. X. Ji, J. Wu, T. T. L. Au-Yeung, C. W. Yip, R. K. Haynes,
A. S. C. Chan, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1093 – 1095; b) X. Y. Wu,
X. Y. Liu, G. Zhao, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 2299 –
2305.
[10] a) P. I. Dosa, J. C. Ruble, G. C. Fu, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 444 –
445; b) P. I. Dosa, G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 445 –
aldehyde. Catalysis by this monomeric H -binol complexis
8
446.
consistent with the observed linear relationship between the
ee value of the ligand and that of the product. The transition
state 8 is proposed for this reaction on the basis of previous
mechanistic work in the area of catalytic asymmetric organo-
[
11] a) W.-S. Huang, L. Pu, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4222 – 4223;
b) W. S. Huang, L. Pu, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 145 – 149.
12] a) C. Bolm, K. Muæiz, Chem. Commun. 1999, 1295 – 126; b) C.
Bolm, N. Hermanns, J. P. Hildebrand, K. Muæiz, Angew. Chem.
2000, 112, 3607 – 3609; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3465 –
3467; c) C. Bolm, M. Kesselgruber, N. Hermanns, J. P. Hilde-
brand, G. Raabe, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 1536 – 1538; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1488 – 1490.
[
[
22]
zinc additions. Multiple peaks at d = 4.85–4.25 (tBuCHPh)
and at 0.95–0.60 ppm ((CH ) C) suggest the formation of
3
3
various zinc alkoxide products from the addition of phenyl to
the aldehyde. These zinc alkoxides probably existed as
oligomers or clusters. After complete consumption of diphe-
nylzinc by excess trimethylacetaldehyde, the [2+3] complex
[
13] a) G. Zhao, X.-G. Li, X.-R. Wang, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2
2
001, 12, 399 – 403; b) D.-H. Ko, K. H. Kim, D.-C. Ha, Org. Lett.
002, 4, 3759 – 3762.
reappeared. Addition of D O to the reaction mixture
2
[14] M. G. Pizzuti, S. Superchi, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16,
2263 – 2269.
converted the zinc alkoxide products into 2,2-dimethyl-1-
phenyl-1-propanol with two singlets observed at d = 4.01 and
[15] J. M. Betancort, C. Garcia, P. J. Walsh, Synlett 2004, 749 – 760.
[16] M. Fontes, X. Verdaguer, L. Solà, M. A. Pericàs, A. Riera, J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 2532 – 2543.
1
0
.89 ppm in the H NMR spectrum. The ligand (S)-4 was also
regenerated. The mechanism depicted in Scheme 2 on the
basis of the NMR study illustrates our current understanding
of this catalytic process and more work will be conducted.
In summary, (S)-4 allows high enantioselectivity in the
reaction of diphenylzinc with both aliphatic and aromatic
[
[
[
17] L. Liu, L. Pu, Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7427 – 7430.
18] See the Supporting Information.
19] Selected references on 1,1’-binaphthyl-based bifunctional cata-
lysts: a) M. Kanai, N. Kato, E. Ichikawa, M. Shibasaki, Synlett
2005, 1491 – 1508; b) K. Matsui, S. Takizawa, H. Sasai, J. Am.
2
76
ꢀ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 273 –277