8318
A. K. Chakraborti, A. Kondaskar / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 8315–8319
1991, 91, 437–475; (d) Mitsunobu, O. In Comprehensive
Organic Synthesis; Winterfeldt, E., Ed.; Pergamon Press:
New York, 1996; Vol. 6, Part 1.3.4.1; (e) Rao, A. S.;
Paknikar, S. K.; Kirtane, J. G. Tetrahedron 1983, 39,
2323–2367.
5. (a) Crooks, P. A.; Szyudler, R. Chem. Ind. (London) 1973,
1111–1112; (b) Deyrup, J. A.; Moyer, C. L. J. Org. Chem.
1969, 34, 175–179; (c) Freifelder, M.; Stone, G. R. J. Org.
Chem. 1961, 26, 1477–1480; (d) Mousseron, M.; Jullien,
J.; Jolchine, Y. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1952, 757–766; (e)
Lutz, R. E.; Freek, J. A.; Murphy, R. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1948, 70, 2015–2023.
Scheme 2. Reaction of epichlorohydrin with a nucleophile.
The specific advantages are that the reactions are car-
ried out under mild conditions in short times, with
excellent stereo-, regio-, and chemoselectivity, and work
for aromatic and aliphatic amines. The low cost and
6. Alumina: Posner, G. H.; Rogers, D. Z. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1977, 99, 8208–8214.
7. (a) Et2AlNHR: Overman, L. E.; Flippin, L. A. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1981, 22, 196–198; (b) Silicon amides: Pap-
ini, A.; Ricci, I.; Taddei, M.; Seconi, G.; Dembach, P. J.
23
lack of appreciable toxicity of ZrCl4 are consistent
with increasing environmental concerns.24 The solvent-
free reaction conditions employed in the present
method will make it ‘environmentally friendly’ and
potentially useful for industrial applications.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 2261–2265; (c)
R2NMgBr: Carre, M. C.; Houmounou, J. P.; Caubere, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 3107–3110; (d) R%PbNR2:
3
Yamada, J.-I.; Yumoto, M.; Yamamoto, Y. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1989, 30, 4255–4258; (e) Cu amide: Yamamoto, Y.;
Asao, N.; Meguro, M.; Tsukade, N.; Nemoto, H.; Ada-
yari, N.; Wilson, J. G.; Nakamura, H. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1993, 1201–1203.
Typical procedure: 2-(phenylamino)cyclohexanol: ZrCl4
(0.03 g, 5 mol%) was added to a magnetically stirred
mixture of 1 (0.25 mL, 2.5 mmol) and aniline (0.225
mL, 2.5 mmol) at room temperature under nitrogen.
After completion of the reaction (15 min, TLC), the
reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O (15 mL) and the
precipitated catalyst was separated by decantation of
the supernatant ethereal solution. The catalyst was
washed with Et2O (10 mL) and the combined ethereal
solutions were dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated in
vacuo to afford 2-(phenylamino)cyclohexanol (0.475 g,
8. (a) Ti(OPri)4: Sagava, S.; Abe, H.; Hase, Y.; Inaba, T. J.
Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4962; (b) DIPAT (diisopropoxyalu-
minium trifluoroacetate): Rampalli, S.; Chaudhari, S. S.;
Akamanchi, K. G. Synthesis 2000, 78–80.
9. (a) Ph4SbOTf: Fujiwara, M.; Imada, M.; Baba, A.; Mat-
suda, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 739–742; (b)
La(OTf)3: Chini, M.; Crotti, P.; Favero, L.; Machhia, F.;
Pineschi, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 433–436; (c)
Yb(OTf)3: Meguro, M.; Asao, N.; Yamamoto, Y. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 2597–2601; (d) LiOTf:
Auge, J.; Leroy, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 7715–
7716; (e) Cu(OTf)2 and Sn(OTf)2: Sekar, G.; Singh, V. K.
J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 287–289.
1
100%), mp 57–59°C (lit.9e 58–59°C); H NMR (CDCl3)
l 1.03–1.42 (m, 4H), 1.72–1.78 (m, 2H), 2.10–2.16 (m,
2H), 2.8–3.0 (m, 2H, D2O exchangeable), 3.13 (ddd,
1H, J=3.9, 10.0, 10.1 Hz), 3.33 (ddd, 1H, J=4.2, 10.4,
10.5 Hz), 6.7–7.2 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) l 24.27,
25.02, 31.62, 33.15, 60.17, 74.55, 114.40, 118.38, 129.34,
147.81; EIMS (m/z) 191 (M+).
10. (a) CoCl2: Iqbal, J.; Pandey, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990,
31, 575–576; (b) TaCl5: Chandrasekhar, S.; Ramchander,
T.; Prakash, S. J. Synthesis 2000, 1817–1818.
11. Chini, M.; Crotti, P.; Macchia, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990,
31, 4661–4664.
References
12. (a) SmI2: Weghe, V.; Collin, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 1649–1652; (b) SmCl3: Fu, X.-L.; Wu, S.-H. Synth.
Commun. 1997, 27, 1677–1684; (c) CeCl3: Reddy, L. R.;
Reddy, M. A.; Bhanumathi, N.; Rao, K. R. Synthesis
2001, 831–832.
13. (a) Kotsuki, H.; Shimanouchi, T.; Teraguchi, M.;
Kataoka, M.; Tatsukawa, A.; Nishizawa, H. Chem. Lett.
1994, 2159–2162; (b) Kotsuki, H.; Hayashida, K.; Shi-
manouchi, T.; Nishizawa, H. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
984–990.
14. Mojtahedi, M. M.; Saidi, M. R.; Bolourtchian, M. J.
Chem. Res. (S) 1999, 128–129.
15. Metal alkylamides induce the rearrangement of epoxides
to allylic alcohols. See: (a) Crandall, J. K.; Apparu, M.
Org. React. 1983, 29, 345–443; (b) Kissel, C. L.; Rick-
1. (a) Gehlert, D. R.; Goldstein, D. J.; Hipskind, P. A. Ann.
Rep. Med. Chem. 1999, 201–210; (b) Corey, E. J.; Zhang,
F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1931–1934; (c) Johan-
nes, C. W.; Visser, M. S.; Weatherhead, G. S.; Hoveyda,
A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8340–8347; (d) Chng,
B. L.; Ganesan, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7,
1511–1514; (e) Rogers, G. A.; Parsons, S. M.; Anderson,
D. C.; Nilsson, L. M.; Bahr, B. A.; Kornreich, W. D.;
Kaufman, R.; Jacobs, R. S.; Kirtman, B. J. Med. Chem.
1989, 32, 1217–1230; (f) De Cree, J.; Geukens, H.; Leem-
poels, J.; Verhaegen, H. Drug Dev. Res. 1986, 8, 109–117.
2. (a) O’Brien, P. Angew Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 326–329;
(b) Li, G.; Chang, H.-T.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 451–454.
3. Ager, D. J.; Prakash, I.; Schaad, D. R. Chem. Rev. 1996,
96, 835–876.
4. (a) Bergmeier, S. C. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2561–2576; (b)
Hodgson, D. M.; Gibbs, A. R.; Lee, G. P. Tetrahedron
1996, 52, 14361–14384; (c) Hanson, R. M. Chem. Rev.
17. Huheey, J. E. Inorganic Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Roger &
Harper Row: Singapore, 1990; Chapter 18.