reaction was carried out under solvent-free conditions. For
example, the reaction of 4a with 5a without using toluene
afforded 6a of 51% ee in 51% yield. Similarly, 4b was
converted to 6b in 30% yield and 50% ee under solvent-free
conditions. In contrast, when the reaction was performed
using (S)-BINOL as catalyst instead of (R)-3, no reactivity
and enantioselectivity were observed (Table 1). It was also
found that the reaction is very sensitive to the structure of
nucleophile. In this case of the reactions between cyclohexene
oxide (4a) and o- (5b) or p-methylaniline (5c) under the same
conditions, the conversion as well as the enantioselectivity
dropped dramatically.
1 (a) O. M. Yaghi, H. Li, C. Davis, D. Richardson and T. L. Groy,
Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 474; (b) M. Eddaoudi, D. B. Moler, H.
Li, B. Chen, T. M. Reineke, M. O’Keeffe and O. M. Yaghi, Acc.
Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 319; (c) O. M. Yaghi, M. O’Keeffe, N. M.
Ockwig, H. K. Chae, M. Eddaoudi and J. Kim, Nature, 2003, 423,
705; (d) X. Zhao, B. Xiao, A. J. Fletcher, K. M. Thomas,
D. Bradshaw and M. J. Rosseinsky, Science, 2004, 306, 1012; (e)
G. Ferey, C. Mellot-Draznieks, C. Serre and F. Millange, Acc.
Che. Res., 2005, 38, 217; (f) R. J. Hill, D. L. Long, N. R.
Champness, P. Hubberstey and M. Schroder, Acc. Chem. Res.,
2005, 38, 335.
2 (a) M. Eddaoudi, J. Kim, N. Rosi, D. Vodak, J. Wachter, M.
O’Keeffe and O. M. Yaghi, Science, 2002, 295, 469; (b) K. Seki and
W. Mori, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 1380; (c) J. L. C. Rowsell, A.
R. Millward, K. S. Park and O. M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2004, 126, 5666; (d) R. Matsuda, R. Kitaura, S. Kitagawa, Y.
Kubota, R. V. Belosludov, T. C. Kobayashi, H. Sakamoto, T.
Chiba, M. Takata, Y. Kawazoe and Y. Mita, Nature, 2005, 436,
238.
3 (a) K. S. Min and M. P. Suh, Chem.–Eur. J., 2001, 7, 303; (b) K.
Uemura, S. Kitagawa, M. Kondo, K. Fukui, R. Kitaura, H. C.
Chang and T. Mizutani, Chem.–Eur. J., 2002, 8, 3587; (c) D.
Bradshaw, T. J. Prior, E. J. Cussen, J. B. Claridge and M. J.
Rosseinsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 6106; (d) K. S. Suslick,
P. Bhyrappa, J. H. Chou, M. E. Kosal, S. Nakagaki, D. W.
Smithenry and S. R. Wilson, Acc. Chem. Res., 2005, 38, 283; (e)
Y. Song, T. Zhou, X. Wang, X. Li and R. Xiong, Cryst. Growth
Des., 2006, 6, 14; (f) L. Pan, D. H. Olson, L. R. Ciemnolonski, R.
Heddy and J. Li, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 616; (g) S.
Horike, D. Tanaka, K. Nakagawa and S. Kitagawa, Chem. Com-
mun., 2007, 3395.
In summary, a novel chiral metal–organic framework has
been synthesized and structurally characterized. In the pre-
sence of the chiral metal–organic framework, asymmetric ring
opening reactions of epoxides with amines proceeded to give
optically active b-amino alcohols under solvent-free condi-
tions. Continued efforts to apply this strategy to other asym-
metric reactions are presently under way.
Notes and references
.
z X-ray single crystal diffraction data for (R)–1 2 was collected on a
Rigaku RAXIS RAPID imaging plate diffractometer using Cu Ka
radiation. Crystal data: formula C62H74N4O14, formula weight
1099.28, space group P21212(#18), a = 13.7716(6), b = 15.0164(7),
c = 15.8042(8) A, V = 3268.3(3) A3, Z = 2, r = 1.117 g cmꢁ3, 2ymax
= 136.51, R1 = 0.1250 (calculated on F2 for 2503 reflections with I 4
2s(I)), wR2 = 0.3256 (calculated on F for 3303 reflections), GOF =
4 (a) B. Gomez-Lor, E. Guttierez-Puebla, M. Iglesias, M. Monge, C.
Ruiz-Valero and N. Snejko, Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 2568; (b) K.
Schlichte, T. Kratzka and S. Kaskel, Microporous Mesoporous
Mater., 2004, 73, 81; (c) C. Wu, A. Hu, L. Zhang and W. Lin, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 8940; (d) L. Alaerts, E. Seguin, H.
Poelman, F. Thibault-Starzyk, P. A. Jacobs and D. E. De Vos,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2006, 12, 7353; (e) S. Hasegawa, S. Horike, S.
Furukawa, K. Mochizuki, Y. Kinoshita and S. Kitagawa, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 2607.
7
1.066. The structure was solved by SHELXS97 and refined by
SHELXL97 8. The molecule of 1 lies on a 2-fold axis in the crystal.
The absolute configuration of 1 was determined based on that of 2.
CCDC 660911. For crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic
format see DOI: 10.1039/b714083e
y X-ray single crystal diffraction data for (R)-3 was collected on a
Rigaku RAXIS RAPID imaging plate diffractometer using Mo Ka
5 (a) O. R. Evans, H. L. Ngo and W. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2001, 123, 10395; (b) Y. Cui, O. R. Evance, L. H. Ngo,
P. S. White and W. Lin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41,
1159; (c) Y. Cui, H. L. Ngo, P. S. White and W. Lin, Chem.
Commun., 2003, 994; (d) D. Bradshaw, T. J. Prior, E. J. Cussen,
J. B. Claridge and M. J. Rossensky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004,
126, 6106; (e) C. D. Wu, A. Hu, L. Zhang and W. Lin, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 8940; (f) W. Lin, J. Solid State Chem.,
2005, 178, 2486; (g) C. Wu and W. Lin, Chem. Commun., 2005,
3673; (h) D. N. Dybtsev, A. L. Nuzhdin, H. Chun, K. P. Bryliakov,
E. P. Talsi, V. P. Fedin and K. Kim, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2006, 45, 916; (i) Y. Song, T. Zhou, X. Wang, X. Li and R. Xiong,
Cryst. Growth Des., 2006, 6, 14; (j) S. Cho, B. Ma, S. T. Nguyen,
J. T. Hupp and T. E. Albrecht-Schmitt, Chem. Commun.,
2006, 2563.
radiation. Crystal data: formula C45H36Cu2O19
1007.86, space group P21(#4), a = 15.620(5), b = 11.377(4), c =
15.620(5) A, b = 94.88(5)1, V = 2766(2) A, Z = 2, r = 1.210 g cmꢁ3
, formula weight
,
2ymax = 50.01, R1 = 0.0745 (for 6750 reflections with I 4 2s(I)), wR2
= 0.1946 (for 8263 reflections), GOF = 1.039, Flack parameter =
ꢁ0.05(2) (refined using 3212 Friedel pairs). The structure was solved
by SHELXS97 and refined by SHELXL97. The absolute configuration
was determined based on the Flack parameter. At the first stage of the
structure analysis, it was suggested that the unit cell corresponded to
C-centered orthorhombic cell and its space group was C2221(#20).
After successive trials were failed in the structure determination, we
supposed that the compound might be crystallized in merohedrally
twinning form with two domains of the space group P21(#4). The unit
cell transformation matrix was 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 1 ꢁ0.5 0.5 0 (according to
the representation in SHELXL). The structures composed of the two
domains related by the matrix of 0 0 ꢁ1 0 ꢁ1 0 ꢁ1 0 0 was successfully
solved and refined to R1 = 0.0751. The twin fraction at the last stage
of the refinement was 0.510(3). CCDC 660912. For crystallographic
data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/b714083e
6 K. Tanaka, H. Takano and Z. Lipkowska, J. Inc. Phenom., 2006,
56, 281.
7 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS97, Program for the Solution of Crystal
Structures, University of Gottingen, Germany, 1997.
8 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL97, University of Gottingen, Germany,
1997.
ꢂc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
822 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 820–822