Chemistry Letters Vol.32, No.10 (2003)
921
Figure 3. Sulfur-specific GC of (A) untreated and (B) treated
light oil. 1b, 4,6-Dimethyldibenzothiophene; 2b, 4,6-dime-
thyldibenzothiophene 5,5-dioxide.
ꢄ
Figure 2. The disappearance of 1a (l) or 1b ( ) in tetrade-
cane during the oxidation with H2O2 and TPA at 40 ꢂC in tet-
radecane/AcOH biphasic system.
of sulfur-free aromatics from the AcOH phase. Figure 3 shows
the sulfur-specific GC of untreated and treated light oil. Sulfur-
specific GC analysis was carried out using a DB-5MS capillary
column (J&W Scientific) on a Shimadzu GC-2010 with a flame
photometric detector. The major peaks in the GC of untreated
and treated oil were identified as 1b and 2b, respectively, by
comparison of their retention times. Sulfur compounds in un-
treated oil disappeared by the oxidation, and they were replaced
by new sulfur-containing products having higher boiling points
in treated oil; these products should be the oxidized ones of the
sulfur compounds in untreated oil. Figure 3 also shows small
amounts of oxidized sulfur products remained in treated oil, in-
dicating that additional refining is necessary for further reduc-
tion of the sulfur content. For example, the sulfur content in
the treated oil decreased to 17 and 2ppm by extraction with
an equal volume of MeOH one and three times, respectively.
These results indicated that oxidized sulfur compounds can be
readily removed from light oil.
aqueous solution (0.5 mL, 5.8 mmol H2O2) and mixed with
AcOH (50 mL). Then, tetradecane solution (50 mL) of 1a
(0.25 mmol) was added and this biphasic mixture was heated
to 40 ꢂC with stirring. Concentration of 1a in tetradecane was
determined by HPLC. Figure 2shows that 1a and 1b were
smoothly removed from tetradecane phase by the oxidation.
At a reaction time of zero, 45% of 1a or 34% of 1b was extract-
ed from tetradecane with AcOH, and the oxidation proceeded in
AcOH (Scheme 1) in the same way as in the biphasic one using
MeCN.3 Most oxidation products, 2a (97%) and 2b (92%), dis-
tributed in the AcOH phase, resulting in the successive removal
of the sulfur compounds from the tetradecane phase. According-
ly, most of the oxidized sulfur compounds can be eliminated
from tetradecane only by separating the two phases. In the tet-
radecane/MeCN system, 52% of 1a or 31% of 1b distributed in
MeCN; the extractability of 1b with AcOH is a little higher than
that with MeCN, in contrast to that of 1a. The rates of removal
of 1a and 1b in the tetradecane/AcOH system were larger than
those in the tetradecane/MeCN one as expected; e.g., 1b was
completely consumed within 40 min in the former (Figure 2),
while the conversion was incomplete (ca. 57%) after 1 h oxida-
tion in the latter. These results suggested that AcOH would be a
more favorable polar solvent than MeCN.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated effective oxidation of
dibenzothiophenes with H2O2 and TPA in an organic biphasic
system using AcOH as a polar solvent. This oxidation system
was found to be effective for the oxidative desulfurization of
light oil. We are currently undertaking a more detailed investi-
gation to organize an overall process.
This oxidation process was applied to light oil containing
318 ppm sulfur. Light oil (50 mL) was treated for 1 h at
40 ꢂC in the acetic acid (50 mL) biphasic system with 35 wt %
H2O2 aqueous solution (0.5 mL, 5.8 mmol H2O2) and TPA
(2.5 mmol). The oil phase was separated, washed with water,
and dehydrated with CaCl2. Then its sulfur content was meas-
ured using a Horiba SLFA-UV21 analyzer. The sulfur content
in the treated oil was effectively reduced to 58 ppm, while that
without H2O2 and TPA was decreased to only 273 ppm; thus,
extraction alone is not sufficient for desulfurization. MeCN ex-
tracts aromatics as well as sulfur-containing compounds from
light oil in a light oil/MeCN system.6,7 The light oil used con-
tained 21 vol% aromatics and AcOH also extracted the aromat-
ics in this biphasic system, indicating the need of the recovery
References
1
T. Kabe, A. Ishihara, and H. Tajima, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
31, 1577 (1992).
2X. Ma, K. Sakanishi, and I. Mochida, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
33, 218 (1994).
3
K. Yazu, Y. Yamamoto, T. Furuya, K. Miki, and K.
Ukegawa, Energy Fuels, 15, 1535 (2001).
K. Yazu, Y. Yamamoto, K. Miki, and K. Ukegawa, J. Oleo
Sci., 50, 521 (2000).
4
5
6
T. Aida, Syokubai, 37, 243 (1995).
Y. Shiraishi, T. Hirai, and I. Komasawa, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 37, 203 (1998).
7
Y. Shiraishi, Y. Taki, T. Hirai, and I. Komasawa, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res., 38, 3310 (1999).
Published on the web (Advance View) September 8, 2003; DOI 10.1246/cl.2003.920