6
30
G.-F. Chen et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 20 (2013) 627–632
1
8
432, 1363, 1345, 1311, 1288, 1244, 1128, 1101, 987, 888, 843,
2.3.17. Compound 3q
2-(2-Furanyl)benzothiazole: brown crystals, IR (KBr, cm ):
3143, 3121, 3048, 1598, 1541, 1522, 1502, 1473, 1455, 1433,
1
ꢁ1
10, 761; H NMR: d
= 8.1 Hz, J
H, ArH), 7.96 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.70 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, ArH),
.56 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, ArH); 13C NMR:
H
8.93 (s, 1H, ArH), 8.42 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H,
ArH), 8.34 (dd, 1H, J
1
7
1
2
= 1.3 Hz, ArH), 8.13 (d, J = 8.2 Hz,
1420, 1385, 1313, 1253, 1244, 1218, 1155, 1012, 897, 882, 769,
1
761, 747; H NMR: d
H
8.08 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.90 (d,
d
1
C
164.9, 153.9, 148.8, 135.3, 135.2, 133.0, 130.1, 126.8, 126.0,
25.1, 123.7, 122.3, 121.8; m/z (ESI): 257 [M+H] .
J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.62 (s, 1H, FuranH), 7.51 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H,
ArH), 7.40 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.22 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, FuranH),
+
1
3
6
1
2
C
.61 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, FuranH); C NMR: d 157.6, 153.7, 148.8,
44.7, 134.3, 126.5, 125.2, 123.1, 121.6, 112.5, 111.5; m/z (ESI):
2
.3.12. Compound 3l
+
02 [M+H] .
2
-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)benzothiazole: white crystals, IR (KBr,
ꢁ
1
cm ): 3061, 1587, 1473, 1464, 1456, 1419, 1388, 1374, 1310,
1
1
279, 1257, 1245, 1230, 1136, 1027, 985, 824, 786, 757, 725;
NMR: d 8.23 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H, ArH), 8.09 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, ArH),
.93 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.90 (dd, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz, J = 2.0 Hz,
ArH), 7.57 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.52–7.55 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.43–
H
H
3
. Results and discussion
7
1
2
In the initial experiment, we investigated various conditions in
.45 (m, 1H, ArH); 1 C NMR: d
3
7
1
C
165.0, 154.0, 135.1, 133.5, 131.0,
the model reaction of o-aminothiophenol (1) with benzaldehyde
2a) in the presence of FeCl /Montmorillonite K-10 under ultra-
sound irradiation and the results were summarized in Table 1.
The effect of various solvents (such as EtOH, CH COOC , CH Cl
DMF, CH CN, THF, CHCl , 1,4-dioxane and MeOH) on the model
+
29.0, 126.7, 126.5, 125.7, 123.5, 121.7; m/z (ESI): 280 [M+H] .
(
3
3
H
2 5
2
2
,
2
.3.13. Compound 3m
-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)benzothiazole: white crystals, IR (KBr,
2
3
3
ꢁ
1
reaction was conducted in the presence of FeCl /Montmorillonite
cm ): 3067, 1624, 1583, 1549, 1508, 1481, 1457, 1449, 1377,
1
7
3
K-10. The results indicated that the solvents had a significant effect
on the product yield. The use of 1,4-dioxane as solvent gave poor
316, 1258, 1220, 1162, 1106, 1078, 1060, 964, 859, 826, 794,
1
54, 725; H NMR: d
H
8.26 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, ArH), 8.15 (d,
yields (Table 1, Entry 8). Solvents like DMF, CH
moderate yields (Table 1, Entries 4, 5 and 6). The best conversion
was observed when the reaction was performed in CH OH (Table 1,
3
CN and THF gave
J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.97 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.55–7.58 (m,
H, ArH), 7.45–7.48 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.42 (dd, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz,
163.0, 152.4, 136.6, 136.1, 133.3,
2
1
1
3
J
2
= 2.0 Hz, ArH); C NMR: d
C
3
Entry 9). Based on these results, CH
solvent for further investigations.
3
OH was then selected as the
1
2
32.5, 130.8, 130.6, 127.6, 126.5, 125.7, 123.5, 121.4; m/z (ESI):
+
80 [M+H] .
The effect of reaction temperature on the model reaction in the
presence of FeCl /Montmorillonite K-10 under ultrasound irradia-
3
2
.3.14. Compound 3n
tion was also observed. As shown in Table 1, when the temperature
was 25–30, 30–35 and 35–40 °C, the yield of 3a was 85.0% (Entry
2
-(3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl)benzothiazole: brown crystals,
ꢁ1
IR (KBr, cm ): 3099, 3004, 2934, 1616, 1604, 1584, 1559, 1529,
1
1
9
), 85.0% (Entry 10) and 83.2% (Entry 11) respectively. Conse-
478, 1462, 1427, 1387, 1364, 1315, 1279, 1256, 1194, 1124,
quently, the reaction temperature had little effect on the reaction.
In addition, the reaction was slow and gave unsatisfactory yield
033, 1011, 894, 872, 776, 756, 727; 1H NMR: d
9.85 (s, 1H,
H
OH), 8.06 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.89 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, ArH),
.75 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.56 (dd, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz, J = 1.9 Hz,
ArH), 7.48–7.51 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.37–7.39 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.03 (d,
(
(
72.5%) of 2-phenylbenzothiazole (3a) under nitrogen atmosphere
Table 1, Entry 12), it showed that aerial oxygen played an oxidant
7
1
2
role in this reaction.
13
J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, ArH), 4.00 (s, 3H, CH
3 C
); C NMR: d 168.2, 154.0,
To test the generality of this reaction, a series of aromatic
aldehydes with both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing
substituents were reacted with o-aminothiophenol under the opti-
mized reaction conditions, and the corresponding 2-substituted
benzothiazoles (3a–q) were obtained under ultrasound irradiation
or silent conditions. The results are summarized in Tables 2
and 3.
As shown in Tables 2 and 3, a series of aromatic aldehydes were
successfully employed to prepare the corresponding benzothiazole
derivatives in excellent yields. In general, the yields of benzothiazole
derivatives are similar or higher than those described in literatures.
The outstanding character of the present procedure is to save the
reaction time and improve the yield.
1
1
48.6, 147.0, 134.8, 126.3, 126.2, 124.9, 122.7, 122.0, 121.5,
14.8, 109.3, 56.2; m/z (ESI): 258 [M+H] .
+
2.3.15. Compound 3o
2
-(2-Hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)benzothiazole: brown crys-
ꢁ
1
tals, IR (KBr, cm ): 3055, 2937, 2837, 1583, 1540, 1470, 1460,
1
7
7
1
438, 1293, 1279, 1247, 1177, 1117, 1084, 1003, 936, 777, 756,
1
25; H NMR: d
.89 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.75 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.56 (dd,
H, J = 8.2 Hz, J = 1.7 Hz, ArH), 7.49 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.38
H
9.85 (s, 1H, OH), 8.06 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, ArH),
1
2
(
t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.03 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, ArH), 3.99 (s, 3H,
1
3
3 C
CH ); C NMR: d 168.2, 154.0, 148.6, 147.0, 134.8, 126.3, 126.2,
According to the method catalyzed by 4-methoxy-TEMPO in
presence of oxygen [4a], the time and yield of 3a were 9 h and
8
1
24.9, 122.7, 122.0, 121.5, 114.8, 109.3, 56.2; m/z (ESI): 258
+
[
M+H] .
0% respectively heating at 120 °C in xylene for the condensation
of o-aminothiophenol and benzaldehyde. The present procedure
gave 85% yield within 1 h (Table 2, Entry 1) at 25–30 °C. In the
reaction catalyzed by Dowex 50 W in water under aerial oxygen
[34], 3d was obtained in 92% yield at 70 °C for 10 h, whereas the
present procedure afforded 3d in 95.3% yield within 1.2 h at 25–
30 °C (Table 2, Entry 7).
2
.3.16. Compound 3p
0
0
2
-(3 ,4 -Methylenedioxyphenyl)benzothiazole: light yellow
ꢁ1
crystals, IR (KBr, cm ): 3058, 2987, 2908, 1602, 1497, 1473,
1
8
440, 1350, 1254, 1132, 1108, 1071, 1031, 988, 940, 881, 834,
1
H
04, 756, 727; H NMR: d 8.05 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.88 (d,
J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.61–7.64 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.48–7.51 (m, 1H,
ArH), 7.37–7.40 (m, 1H, ArH), 6.92 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.07 (s,
In the present procedure, furfuraldehyde (2q) also afforded the
desired products in moderate yields (72.3%) within 5.0 h (Table 2,
Entry 20). 2-Nitrobenzaldehyde and 2,4-dinitrobenzaldehyde
(Table 2, Entries 21 and 22) were failed. Aliphatic aldehyde was
less reactive than arylaldehyde, no product was obtained when
1
3
2
1
2
2 C
H, CH ); C NMR: d 167.6, 154.0, 150.1, 148.4, 134.8, 128.0,
26.3, 125.0, 122.9, 122.5, 121.5, 108.7, 107.5, 101.7; m/z (ESI):
+
56 [M+H] .