Khojastehnezhad et al.
FULL PAPER
Scheme 1
CH), 6.85 (t, J=8.7 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.46 (t, J=7.8
Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.48—7.55 (m, 4H, arom-H), 7.62 (td,
J=7.7, 1.2 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.84 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H,
arom-H), 7.87 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 8.37 (d, J=
8.5 Hz, 2H, arom-H).
1
3e (Ar=3-HOC6H4): H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 4.55 (s,
1H), 6.42—6.60 (m, 2H), 6.84 (s, 1H), 7.06 (t, J=8.2
Hz, 1H), 7.21 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.34—7.45 (m, 4H),
7.52—7.60 (m, 2H), 7.73—7.81 (m, 4H), 8.36 (d, J=
8.5 Hz, 2H).
+
34
sized according to the literature. The amount of H in
the PPA/SiO2 was determined by acid-base titration.
Melting points were recorded on an electrothermal type
9100 melting point apparatus. The IR spectra were ob-
tained using a 4300 Shimadzu spectrophotometer as
1
3f (Ar=4-HOC6H4): H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 5.21 (sbr.
1H), 6.44 (s, 1H), 6.56 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (t, J=
9.8 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (d, J=8.8 Hz,
2H), 7.61 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (d, J=6.4 Hz, 2H),
7.89 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.33 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 2H).
1
KBr disks. The H NMR (500 MHz) spectra were re-
corded with a Bruker DRX500 spectrometer.
General procedure for the synthesis of 14-aryl-14H-
1
3g (Ar=4-MeOC6H4): H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 3.65 (s,
dibenzo[a,j]xanthenes 3a — 3j using PPA/SiO as
catalyst
2
3H, OCH3), 6.49 (s, 1H, CH), 6.70 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H,
arom-H), 7.40—7.47 (m, 4H, arom-H), 7.51 (d, J=8.9
Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.61 (td, J=8.3, 1.1 Hz, 2H, arom-H),
7.81 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.86 (d, J=8.0 Hz,
2H, arom-H), 8.42 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H, arom-H).
A mixture of β-naphthol 1 (2 mmol), aromatic alde-
hyde 2a—2j (1 mmol), and PPA/SiO2 (0.030 g, 0.015
+
mmol of H ) was heated in the oil bath at 120 ℃ for
1
30—40 min. During the procedure, the reaction was
monitored by TLC. Upon completion, the reaction mix-
ture was cooled to room temperature and hot ethanol
was added. The catalyst was dissolved in hot ethanol
and filtered off. The product was then collected from the
filtrate after cooling to room temperature and recrystal-
lized from ethanol to give compounds 3a—3j in high
yields.
3h (Ar=4-MeC6H4): H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 2.04 (s,
3H, CH3), 6.66 (s, 1H, CH), 6.92 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 2H,
arom-H), 7.45 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.48 (d, J=
8.1 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.54 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H, arom-H),
7.61 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.91 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H,
arom-H), 7.92 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 8.65 (d, J=
8.5 Hz, 2H, arom-H).
1
3i (Ar=3-O2NC6H4): H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 6.63 (s,
1H, CH), 7.32 (t, J=8.0 Hz, 1H, arom-H), 7.47 (t, J=
7.4 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.55 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H, arom-H),
7.65 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.80—7.92 (m, 6H,
arom-H), 7.34 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 8.45 (s, 1H,
arom-H).
Recycling and reusing of the catalyst
Due to the fact that the catalyst was dissolved in hot
ethanol, it could therefore be recycled by a simple filtra-
tion. The separated catalyst was washed with cold etha-
nol, dried at 100 ℃ under vacuum for 2 h and was re-
used in another reaction. The catalyst could be reused at
least three times without significant loss of activity.
1
3j (Ar=4-O2NC6H4): H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 6.63 (s,
1H, CH), 7.47 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.54 (d, J=
8.9 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.63 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H, arom-H),
7.70 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.84—7.91 (m, 4H,
arom-H), 8.02 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 8.31 (d, J=
8.4 Hz, 2H, arom-H).
1
H NMR data for compounds 3a— 3j
1
3a (Ar=Ph): H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 6.53 (s, 1H, CH),
7.04 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H, arom-H), 7.19 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H,
arom-H), 7.45 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.54 (d, J=
8.9 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.58 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 2H, arom-H),
7.62 (td, J=7.0, 1.2 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.83 (d, J=8.9
Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.87 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 8.44
(d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H, arom-H).
Results and discussion
PPA-SiO2 was prepared according to the literature
34
procedure. Initially, the synthesis of compound 3a was
selected as a model reaction to optimize the reaction
conditions. The reaction was carried out by heating a
mixture of β-naphthol (2 mmol) and benzaldehyde (1
mmol) under various conditions.
1
3b (Ar=4-BrC6H4): H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 6.39 (s, 1H,
CH), 7.19 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.32—7.40 (m,
4H, arom-H), 7.42 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.53 (t,
J=7.5 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.74 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H,
arom-H), 7.78 (d, J=7.9 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 8.26 (d, J=
8.3 Hz, 2H, arom-H).
The efficiency of the reaction is affected mainly by
the amount of PPA/SiO2 (Table 1). No product was ob-
tained in the absence of the catalyst (Entry 1) indicating
that the catalyst is necessary for the reaction. Increasing
the amount of the catalyst increased the yields of the
product 3a. The optimal amount of PPA/SiO2 was 0.03
g (Entry 4); increasing the amount of the catalyst be-
yond this value did not increase the yield noticeably
(Entries 5, 6).
1
3c (Ar=4-ClC6H4): H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 6.51 (s, 1H,
CH), 7.14 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.22—7.55 (m,
6H, arom-H), 7.62 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.84 (d,
J=8.9 Hz, 2H, arom-H), 7.87 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 2H,
arom-H), 8.35 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H, arom-H).
1
3d (Ar=4-FC6H4): H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 6.53 (s, 1H,
298
© 2011 SIOC, CAS, Shanghai, & WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chin. J. Chem. 2011, 29, 297— 302