5
40 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2012
4 2 2
Table 2 Preparation of amides from alcohols and nitriles in the presence of KAl(SO ) .12H O under heterogeneous conditions
Entry
R
R′
Product
Time/h
Yield/%a
M.p. /°C
Reported[ref.]
Found
17]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
C
6
H
3
5
(CH
(CH
3
)
3
3
C
C
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
3h
3i
3j
3k
3l
3m
3n
3o
3p
2
1.5
2
2
2.5
3
2.5
1.5
2.5
1.5
3
2
2.5
2
96
90
93
93
90
85
80
90
89
90
74
90
89
92
85
85
132–134
96–98
133–135[
CH
CH =CH
)
3
95–96[
18]
9]
[
2
C
C
6
H
5
CHCH
CH
CHCH
3
62–64
63–65
18]
19]
19]
C
C
3-NO
4-CF
4-CH
6
H
H
5
C
6
H
5
5
2
128–130
114–115
127–130
136–137
117–120
116–118
112–115
113–115
126–129
116–117
75–77
129–130[
114–116[
128–130
6
5
6
H
3
[
2
C
6
H
4
4
(CH
(CH
(CH
3
)
3
)
3
)
3
C
3
C
3
C
19]
3
C
6
H
135[
[17]
3
C
6
H
4
117–118
18]
C
C
6
H
H
5
CH
CH
2
6 5 2
C H CH
117[
[
18]
18]
18]
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
6
5
2
(CH
(CH
(CH
(CH
3
)
3
)
3
)
3
)
3
3
3
3
C
113–115
CH
CH
4-CH
CH
2
CN
=CH
OC
C
C
C
114–115[
[
2
125–127
117[
20]
3
6
H
4
[
18]
3
C
C
6
H
H
5
CHCH
CHCH
3
75–76
18]
C
C
6
H
H
5
CH
CH
2
6
5
3
2
3
99–101
124–126
100–101[
–
6
5
2
CH
2
=CHCH
2
a
Isolated yields of products.
References to known products.
b
with the proposed structure. The IR spectrum of compound 3p
also supported the suggested structure.
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Research
Council of the IslamicAzad University ofYazd and The Islamic
Azad University of Zahedan of Iran.
In summary, under solvent-free conditions, alum is a
reusable, efficient, cheap, eco-friendly, readily available and
heterogeneous catalyst for this reaction. Allylic and benzylic
alcohols as well as tertiary alcohols react efficiently in Ritter
reaction with some advantages such as selectivity, generality,
simplicity, clean reactions, easy work up, scale up and improved
yields.
Received 13 April 2012; accepted 25 June 2012
Paper 1201260 doi: 10.3184/174751912X13418518739562
Published online: 28 August 2012
References
1
2
3
4
J.J. Ritter and P.P. Minieri, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1948, 70, 4045.
F.R. Benson and J.J. Ritter, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1949, 71, 4128.
J.A. Samguigni and R. Levins, J. Med. Chem., 1964, 7, 573.
K. Niknam, M.A. Zolfigol and T. Sadabadia, J. Iran. Chem. Soc., 2007, 4,
199.
Experimental
Alcohols, nitriles, and other necessary compounds were purchased
from Fluka and Merck companies. IR spectra were run on a Shimadzu
IR-470 spectrometer. H and NMR spectra were obtained using a
1
13
5
6
7
8
9
F. Tamaddon, M. Khoobi and E. Keshavarz, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48,
Bruker DRX-500 Avance spectrometer in solution in DMSO-d with
6
3
643.
E. Callens, A.J. Burton and A.G.M. Barrett, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47,
699.
H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor and A. Khoshnood, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9,
29.
T. Okuhara, X. Chen and H. Matsuda, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 2000, 200,
09.
TMS as an internal standard. Melting points were determined using a
Barnstead Electrothermal melting point apparatus. Mass spectra were
recorded on a Finnegan-Mat 8430 mass spectrometer at an ionisation
potential of 70 eV.
8
5
General procedure
A mixture of alcohol (3 mmol), nitrile (3 mmol), KAl(SO ) .12H O
1
4
2
2
J.S. Yadav, B.V. Subba Reddy, T. Pandurangam, Y. Jayasudan Reddy and
(
0.3 g) was placed in a round bottom flask. The materials were mixed
M.K. Gupta, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 1297.
and heated at 100 ºC for the given time (Table 2). The progress of the
reaction was followed by TLC. After the completion of the reaction,
the resulting mixture was cooled to room temperature and extracted
with EtOAc (2 × 20 mL). The organic layer was washed with 10%
NaHCO3 and water, dried with Na SO and concentrated under
10 V. Polshettiwar and R.S. Varma, Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49, 2661.
11 T. Okuhara and X. Chen, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 2001, 48, 293.
12 B. Sadeghi, B.F. Mirjalili and M.M. Hashemi, Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49,
2
575.
1
3
B.F. Mirjalili, M.M. Hashemi, B. Sadeghi and H. Emtiazi, J. Chin. Chem.
Soc., 2009, 56, 386.
2
4
reduced pressure to give the products in 81–96% yields. The solid
1
1
4
5
B. Sadeghi, A. Hassanabadi and S, Bidaki, J. Chem. Res., 2011, 35, 666.
B. Sadeghi, A. Hassanabadi and E, Taghvatalab, J. Chem. Res., 2011, 35,
product was then crystallised from H O.
2
N-Allyl-2-phenylacetamide (3p): White powder; m.p. 124–126 °C.
7
07.
−1
IR (KBr) (νmax, cm ): 3330, 3055, 1635, 1493,1412, 1205, 739, 693.
16
17
18
B. Sadeghi, A. Hassanabadi and M, Kamali, J. Chem. Res., 2012, 36, 9.
M.M. Laouraj and M. Mokhtary, Monatsh Chem., 2009, 140, 53.
K.V. Katkar, P.S. Chaudhavi and K.G. Akamanchi, Green Chem., 2011, 13,
835.
+
1
MS (m/z, %): 175 (M , 10). H NMR (500 MHz, d -DMSO): δ 7.24–
6
7
5
.38 (5H, m, 5 CH phenyl moiety), 5.91 (1H, m), 5.17(1H, s, NH),
13
.21–5.23(2H, m), 3.87(2H, m, CH ), 3.49(2H, s, CH ), C NMR
2
2
(
125.75 MHz, d -DMSO): δ 41.2, 47.3, 117.1, 128.1, 129.6, 131.2,
19 F. Tamaddon and F. Tavakoli, J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem., 2011, 337, 52.
20 J.C. Baum, J.E. Milne, J.A. Murry and O.R. Thiel, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 74,
2207.
6
1
7
34.2 135.9, 172.3. Anal. Calcd. for C H NO: C, 75.40; H, 7.48; N,
.99. Found: C, 75.28; H, 7.60; N, 7.82%.
11 13