10.1002/ejoc.201901864
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
COMMUNICATION
19[c]
41 (X = N-morpholine)
42
41
informations suggest that we can exclude the in-situ formation of
azirines under the reaction conditions reported in this manuscript.
mild C(sp2)-H-amination using
nucleophilic catalyst with aryl
[a] All reactions were performed on a 0.5 mmol scale in dry CHCl3 [0.25 M]
with TBA[Fe] [10 mol-%] using microwave irradiation for 1 h at 80 °C. [b]
Isolated yield after column chromatography. [c] Reaction was performed on
a 0.2 mmol scale.
Herein, we report
Bu4N[Fe(CO)3(NO)] as
a
a
acrylazides as starting materials. These materials are readily
accessible in one step via a Knoevenagel-condensation from -
azide alkylacetates and the corresponding aldehydes. A variety
of different substrates reacted smoothly to the corresponding
indole derivatives in good to excellent yields.
A Hammett-correlation for conversion of substrates 1, 5, 7, 9,
11, 15, and 17 clearly showed that more electronrich vinyl
azides are displaying a higher reactivity (Figure 2).
0,2
0,1
0
Acknowledgements
Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (PL
300/14-1) is gratefully acknowledged.
-0,4
-0,2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
-0,1
-0,2
-0,3
-0,4
-0,5
-0,6
Keywords: iron • C-H activation • C(sp2)-H-amination • indole •
metal-ligand cooperation • catalysis
[1]
For selected reviews see: a) E. F. V. Scriven, K. Turnbull, Chem. Rev.
1988, 88, 297-368; b) G. L’Abbé, Chem. Rev. 1969, 69, 345-363; c) S.
Bräse, C. Gil, K. Knepper , V. Zimmermann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 5188-5240, d) D. Huang, G. Yan, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017,
359, 1600-1619.
Figure 2. Hammett-correlation for TBA[Fe]-catalyzed C-H amination.
[2]
[3]
a) T. Curtius, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1890, 23, 3023-3033; b) T.
Curtius, J. Prakt. Chem. 1894, 50, 275-294.
For selected reviews see: a) T. Driver, Org Biomol Chem. 2010, 8,
3831-3846; b) M.-L. Louillat, F. W. Patureau, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43,
901-910; c) J. Jiao, K. Murakami, K. Itami, ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 610-
633; d) Y. Park, Y. Kim, S. Chang, Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 9247-9301.
In order to shed some light into a potential mechanism, control
experiments were performed (Figure 3). Azirine 2 was formed
following literature procedures[8] and subjected to our (condition
,
A), Driver´s (condition B)[9a] and Bolm´s (condition C)[9c]
[4]
a) J. H. Boyer, F. C. Canter, Chem. Rev. 1954, 54, 1-57; b) ,,Azides
and Nitrenes: Reactivity and Utility’’, E. F. V. Scriven, Academic Press,
Indianapolis, 1984; c) J. Aube, G. L. Milligan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 8965-8966; d) M. F. Budyka , M. M. Kantor, M. V. Alfimov, Russ.
Chem. Rev. 1992, 61, 25-39, e) ,,Organic Azides: Synthesis and
Applications’’, S. Bräse, K. Banert, Wiley, 2010.
procedures (eq. (1), Figure 3).
[5]
[6]
[7]
P. Wang, L. Deng, Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 1222-1240.
B. Plietker, A. Röske, Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 4188-4197.
For selected reviews see: a) G. L’Abbé, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1975,
14, 775-782; b) B. Hu, S. G. DiMagno, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13,
3844-3855.
[8]
[9]
D. Knittel, Synthesis, 1985, 2, 186-188.
a) B. J. Stokes , H. Dong , B. E. Leslie , A. L. Pumphrey, T. G. Driver, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7500-7501; b) Y. Liu, J. Wei, C.-M. Che,
Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 6926-6928; c) J. Bonnamour, C. Bolm, Org.
Lett. 2011, 13, 2012-2014.
[10] a) K. Isomura, S. Kobayashi, H. Taniguchi, Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 9,
3499-3502; (b) K. Isomura, K. Uto, H Taniguchi,. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1977, 664-665; c) A. Padwa, P. H. J. Carlsen, J. Org. Chem.
1978, 43, 2029-2037; d) K. Isomura, G.-I. Ayabe, S. Hatano, H.
Taniguchi, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980, 1252-1253; e) D. F.
Taber, W. Tian, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1058-1059; (f) S. Chiba,
G. Hattotri, K. Narasaka, Chem. Lett. 2007, 36, 52-53; g) X. Li, Y. Du, Z.
Liang, X. Li, Y. Pan, K. Zhao, Org. Lett. 2009,11, 2643-2646; h) S. Jana,
M. D, Clements, B. K. Sharp, N. Zheng, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3736-3739.
[11] a) I. T. Alt, B. Plietker, Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 1542-1545; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1519-1522; b) I. T. Alt, C. Guttroff, B. Plietker,
Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 10718-10722; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017,
56, 10582-10586.
Figure 3. C-H-amination: control experiments (conditions A: TBA[Fe] [10 mol-
%], CHCl3 [0.25 M], 80 °C; conditions B: Rh2(O2CC3F7)4 [5 mol-%], PhMe [1 M],
60 °C; conditions C: Fe(OTf)2 [10 mol-%], THF [0.5 M], 80 °C.
While TBA[Fe] did not show any reactivity, both the Rh- and the
Fe(OTf)2-catalyzed
rearrangement product 3 in low to moderate yield, indicating that
the TBA[Fe]-catalyzed transformation follows distinctive
versions
gave
the
corresponding
a
different mechanistic scenario. Treatment of o-deuterated aryl
vinyl azide 1-(o-D1) with TBA[Fe] led to a clean formation of
indole 3-(o-D/H) in 70 % yield. A small kinetic isotope effect was
observed indicating that the C-H-bond scission process might
not be the rate limiting step (eq. (2), Figure 3). These
[12] for non-metal catalyzed examples see: a) P. J. Roy, C. Dufresne, N.
Lachance, J.-P.Leclerc, M. Boisvert, Z. Wang, Y. Leblanc, Synthesis,
2005, 16, 2751-2757; b) A. G. O’Brien, F. Lévesque, P. H. Seeberger,
Chem.
Commun.
2011,
47,
2688-2690.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.