C O MMU N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Comparison of “Phase Screen” Ability for Bromination
Scheme 2. Phase-Vanishing Demethylation by Boron Tribromide
phase screen
density (g/cm3)
methoda
yieldb
ation of anisole and two substituted anisoles also produced the
corresponding phenols in 76-98% yield.
H2O
1.0
A
B
A
A
3%
54%
32%c
81%
In summary, we have demonstrated that a fluorous phase can
screen two otherwise miscible heavier and lighter organic phases
in the bromination of alkenes and the dealkylation of aromatic ethers
by boron tribromide. The fluorous phase acts as a liquid membrane
regulating the exchange between the two organic phases by passive
diffusion. The method may be suitable for controlling heat evolution
in exothermic reactions, especially on a large scale. This is usually
done by cooling and/or by slow addition of one of the components.
Cooling consumes energy, and both cooling and slow addition can
require complex engineering solutions. In contrast, heat evolution
in these fluorous phase screening reactions is regulated by the rate
of transport of the reagent, which in turn depends on readily tunable
features including its solubility in the fluorous phase, the volumes
and surface areas of the phases, and mixing method. Further
applications of this method will be reported in due course.
CH3CN
C6F14
0.79
1.67
a
Conditions: cyclohexene (4 mmol), hexane (1.5 mL), Br2 (2 mmol),
phase screen (1.5 mL), room temperature, 2 days (method A) or 4 h with
gentle stirring (method B) with aluminum foil protection from light.
Isolated yield for product from hexane layer by silica gel chromatography.
b
c
Acetonitrile layer contained 37% yield of dibromocyclohexane.
care not to mix the three layers, proved to considerably accelerate
the reaction. For example, bromination of cyclohexene was
complete within 4 h, giving trans-1,2-dibromocyclohexane in 90%
isolated yield (entry 2). Without shielding the reaction from light,
cyclohexyl bromide was generated in 36% yield along with trans-
,2-dibromocyclohexane in 60% yield. Not only cyclic alkenes
entries 1-5) but also aliphatic alkenes (entries 6-10) underwent
5
1
(
bromination to give the corresponding dibromides in high yields.
In every case, completion of the reaction was noticed by the
disappearance of the bromine phase and recovery of the transpar-
ency of the fluorous layer.6
The ability of the fluorous phase to act as a phase screen was
compared with that of acetonitrile and water, because these solvents
can also create three phase systems with bromine and hexane (Table
Acknowledgment. The Pittsburgh group thanks the National
Institutes of Health for support.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
characterization data (PDF). This material is available free of charge
via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
2
). The use of water as a middle layer was inefficient without
stirring to give trans-1,2-dibromocyclohexane in a very poor yield
3%), suggesting that the diffusion of bromine in water is sluggish.
In the case of acetonitrile, dibromocyclohexane was obtained in
2% from the upper hexane layer, but a comparable amount of the
(
1) Recent reviews: (a) Horv a´ th, I. T. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 641. (b)
Curran, D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1175. (c) Cornils, B.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2057. (d) Kitazume, T. J. Fluorine
Chem. 2000, 105, 265. (e) Furin, G. G. Russ. Chem. ReV. 2000, 69, 491.
(
(
f) Curran, D. P. In Stimulating Concepts in Chemistry; V o¨ gtle, F.,
3
Stoddard, J. F., Shibasaki, M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2000. (g)
Symposium-in-Print on fluorous chemistry. Gladysz, J.; Curran, D. P.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 3823 and succeeding papers.
product was found to be dissolved in the middle acetonitrile layer.
These observations suggest that features of reagent transportation
and extrusion of organic products are superior for fluorous media.
To show that the fluorous phase screening method is applicable
to other exothermic reactions, we focused on boron tribromide
(2) (a) Nakamura, H.; Linclau, B.; Curran, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
1
23, 10119. (b) Luo, Z.; Swaleh, S. M.; Theil, F.; Curran, D. P. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 2585.
(3) For the previously established procedures of bromination of alkenes, see:
(
a) Org. Synth. Coll. 1941; Vol. 1, p 521. (b) Org. Synth. Coll. 1943;
Vol. 2, p 171.
(BBr
3
), which is a powerful reagent for dealkylation of ethers and
(4) For bromination in ionic liquids, see: Chiappe, C.; Capraro, D.; Conte,
V.; Pieraccini, D. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1061.
is heavier than FC-72. BBr
and low temperatures (-78 and 0 °C) are typically employed. A
3
dealkylations are highly exothermic,
(
5) The polybromination course is negligible in our system, which often
becomes a problematic side reaction. For a related reference, see:
MacMillen, D. W.; Grutzner, J. B. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4516.
6) Like all slow addition techniques (for example, syringe pump additions),
the maximum benefits are reaped when the reaction is much faster than
the transport as in the case of the present bromination. Because reagents
have some solubility in the fluorous phase, the disappearance of the bottom
phase may not strictly correspond to the end of the reaction even for fast
reactions. Yet it is a good qualitative guide that the reaction is approaching
completion.
7
3
dry, inert atmosphere is required because BBr is highly moisture
(
sensitive, so water and acetonitrile are not potential phase screens.
We found that the present phase-vanishing method is advantageous
for reactions using boron tribromide (Scheme 2). A triphasic mixture
consisting of a dichloromethane layer containing R-methoxynaph-
thalene, FC-72, and boron tribromide was kept overnight at room
temperature. The bottom phase vanished, and R-naphthol was
obtained from the dichloromethane layer in 94% yield. Demethyl-
(7) (a) McOmie, J. F. W.; Watts, M. L.; West, D. E. Tetrahedron 1968, 24,
289. (b) Benton, F. L.; Dillon, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64, 1128.
2
JA027965Y
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 124, NO. 44, 2002 12947