overcome these problems. In fact, this rigidity makes steroids
exceptional building blocks for the synthesis of steroid-based
macrocyclic molecules.8 We report herein a straightforward
cyclodimerization of a bissteroid scaffold, prepared employ-
ing a “Click” reaction9 on a bisalkyne steroid, by using a
Cu-promoted Glaser-Eglinton homocoupling to furnish in
good overall yields a series of chiral, highly symmetric
tetrameric estrone-derived macrocycles (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
.
Synthetic Strategy for the Cu-Catalyzed Synthesis of
Estrone-Based Macrocycles
Figure 1. Some polymetallic macrocycles prepared using the DCC
cyclooligomerization approach.
valently connected polymetallic macrocyclic rings (in con-
trast with macrocycles joined through a more flexible M-C
bond)7 to study the long-range interaction between metallic
centers.
In contrast with this previous work and according to
literature precedents, the sequential building of a macrocycle
in a limited number of steps will face relative overall low
yields and contamination with a large collection of linear/
cyclic oligomers and polymers of different chain length.3
However, the use of rigid steroid scaffolds may help to
(8) The review by Li and Dias compiles most of the different structural
types of steroid-based architectures reported: (a) Li, Y.; Dias, J. R. Chem.
ReV. 1997, 97, 283. (b) Wallimann, P.; Marti, T.; Fu¨rer, A.; Diederich, F.
Chem. ReV 1997, 97, 1567. For the use of esteroids in the preparation of
cholaphanes and cholaphane-based macrocycles, see: (c) Tamminen, J.;
Kolehmainen, E. Molecules 2001, 6, 21. (d) Rivera, D. G.; Wessjohann,
L. A. Molecules 2007, 12, 1890. (e) Virtanen, E.; Kolehmainen, E. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 3385.
(9) (a) Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 2004. The head to tail cyclodimerization of peptides by the
copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne reaction has been reported. See: (b) Punna,
S.; Kuzelka, J.; Wang, Q.; Finn, M. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
2215. The following reference contains a nice selection of the state of the
art on the copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne reaction: (c) Rodionov, V. O.;
Presolski, S. I.; Gardinier, S.; Lim, Y. H.; Finn, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 12696.
Estrone 1 was propargylated at the oxygen and subse-
quently reacted with lithium TMS-acetylide, using standard
methodology to form 2, which was submitted to reaction
with bisazides 3a-f. The resulting dimers 4a-f were isolated
in 72-88% yields (Scheme 2), demonstrating the exceptional
efficiency of the Cu-catalyzed Huisgen reaction.10 Aromatic
(4a-c), heteroaromatic (4d), aliphatic (4e), and ferrocenyl
(4f) derived azides were fully compatible with this process.11
Having prepared half of the cavity, the TMS-group of the
alkyne of compounds 4 was removed (TBAF, THF), and
the terminal diyne 5 was submitted to the Glaser-Eglinton
coupling (Cu(OAc)2·H2O/MeCN,Py).12 The result of this
coupling strongly depends on the nature of the tether joining
both steroid nuclei. Thus, while compounds 5a and 5d,f
furnished the desired macrocycles 6, having four steroid
nuclei, four triazole, and two 1,3-diyne linkers disposed
(10) The synthesis of compound 4a is representative: A mixture of
diazide 3a (82.4 mg, 0.438 mmol, 1.0 equiv), alkyne 2 (356.6 mg, 0.877
mmol, 2.0 equiv), sodium (L)-ascorbate (17.4 mg, 0.088 mmol, 0.2 equiv),
and CuSO4·5H2O (11.0 mg, 0.044 mmol, 0.1 equiv) in DMF (10 mL) was
stirred under Ar at rt for 3 h. The reaction was quenched with water at 0
°C and allowed to reach rt. The mixture was extracted with AcOEt (3 ×
20 mL), and the organic extracts were washed with water (2 × 20 mL) and
once with brine (20 mL). The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and
filtered, and the solvent was removed under vacuum. The resulting white
solid was purified through a short pad of SiO2 (Hex/AcOEt 2:1 to 1:3) to
yield 4a as a white solid (384.5 mg, 88%). M.p. 126-128 °C. 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (s, 2H), 7.40-7.36 (m, 2H), 7.27-7.25 (m, 2H),
7.20 (d, J ) 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.75 (dd, J1 ) 8.7 Hz, J2 ) 2.4 Hz, 2H), 6.67 (d,
J ) 2.4 Hz, 2H), 5.62 (s, 4H), 5.13 (s, 4H), 2.90-2.73 (m, 4H), 2.41-1.21
(m, 28H), 0.86 (s, 6H), 0.17 (s, 18H). 13CNMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.0
(C), 145.0 (C), 138.0 (C), 133.1 (C), 130.4 (CH), 129.8 (CH), 126.4 (CH),
122.8 (CH), 122.7 (C), 114.7 (CH), 112.2 (CH), 109.5 (C), 89.9 (C), 80.0
(C), 62.0 (2CH2), 51.2 (3CH2), 49.5 (CH), 47.1 (C), 43.7 (CH), 39.3 (CH),
38.9 (CH2), 32.8 (CH2), 29.7 (CH2), 27.2 (CH2), 26.4 (CH2), 22.8 (CH2),
12.7 (CH3), 0.0 (CH3). IR (KBr) νmax 3435, 3139, 2160, 1609, 1498, 1456,
1250, 1047, 843 cm-1. [R]D30 -15.15 (c 0.858, CHCl3). MS (ES) m/z 1001.3
[M + H]+. Anal. Calcd. for C60H76N6O4Si2: C, 71.96; H, 7.65; N, 8.39.
Found: C, 72.23; H, 7.83; N, 8.13.
(11) The structure of all new compounds fully satisfies their spectro-
scopic data. See the Supporting Information.
(12) Cloninger, M. J.; Whitlock, H. W. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6153.
3556
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 16, 2008