Tetrahedron Letters
4
In conclusion we have explored catalytic activity of Pd/Nf-G
composite as catalyst for Buchwald-Hartwig amination and Heck
coupling reactions. The catalyst showed excellent activity against
these C-N and C-C bond forming reactions with simple
methodology. The stability of catalyst has been confirmed by
recyclability. The Pd/Nf-G catalyst can be used up to four cycles
with slight decrease in catalytic activity.
Acknowledgement
We gratefully acknowledge SAIF IIT, Bombay for the
TEM and ICP-AES analysis.
Fig. 2 The plot of GC yield (%) versus time (h) for scheme 2.
References
On the basis of above optimized parameters we have
also carried out the substrate study for Heck coupling with
Pd/Nf-G catalyst. In substrate study, various substituted aryl
halides has been successfully coupled with different alkenes. The
presence of substituents on aromatic ring of halides has
pronounced effect on yield of desire products. Substituents such
as -NO2, -COCH3 of aryl halides gave good response as compare
to -NH2, -OMe, -OH, -CH3, substituents (Table 4, entries 1-7).
However, substituted aryl bromide afforded excellent yield of
corresponding products but required longer reaction time (Table
4, Entries 3, 11 and 15). This is because of high bond energy of
the C-Br bond. The heterocyclic 2-iodothiophene derivative
easily coupled with alkenes and gives moderate yield of product
(Table 4, entry 8). The reactions between iodobenzene and
different alkenes has been tested against Pd/Nf-G catalyst and
found that all reactions efficiently gave high product yield with
100 % selectivity (Table 4, entries 9-15). However, selectivity of
trans styrene (88% and 90%, Table 4 entries 14 and 15) is higher
than cis styrene (4% and 5%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Aydemir, M.; Baysal, A.; Ozturk, G.; Gumgum, B. Appl. Organomet.
Chem., 2009, 23, 108-113.
Mondal, J.; Modak, A.; Bhaumik, A. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2011,
350, 40-48.
Sarkar, K.; Nandi, M.; Islam, M.; Mubark, M.; Bhaumik, A. Appl. Catal.
A: Gen., 2009, 352, 81-86.
Lee, D. H.; Taher, A.; Hossain, S.; Jin, M. J. Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 5540-
5543.
Budarin, V. L.; Shuttleworth P. S.; Clark, J. H.; Luque, R. Curr. Org.
Synth., 2010, 7, 614-627.
Nicolaou, K. C.;. Bulger, P. G.; Sarlah, D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005,
44, 4442-4489.
7
8
Torborg, C.; Beller, M. Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 3027-3043.
Magano, J.; Dunetz, J. Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 2177-2250.
9 Li, Y.; Liu, G.; Cao, C.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Pang, G.; Shi, Y. Tetrahedron,
2013, 69, 6241-6250.
10 Gai, X.; Grigg, R.; Ramzan, M. I.; Sridharan, V.; Collard, S.; Muir, J. E.
Chem. Commun., 2000, 20, 2053-2054.
11 Bourissou, D.; Guerret, O.; Gabbai, F. P.; Bertrand, G. Chem. Rev., 2000,
100, 39-91.
12 Marion, N.;. Nolan, S. P. Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1440-1449.
13 Wass, D. F .; Haddow, M. F.;. Hey, T. W.; Orpen, A. G.;. Russell, C. A.;
Wingad, R. L.; Green, M. Chem. Commun., 2007, 26, 2704-2706.
14 Guo, S.; Wang, Y.; Sun, C.; Li, J.; Zou, D.; Wu, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.,
2013, 54, 3233-3237.
Industrially catalyst recovery and recyclability has
greater importance. For this purpose we have assessed
recyclability of Pd/Nf-G composite for reaction of iodobenzene
with morpholine (Scheme 1) and also for reaction of iodobenzene
with ethyl acrylate (Scheme 2). For recyclability study Pd
loading was 0.2 mol% and 0.3 mol% for scheme 1 and scheme 2
respectively. After completion of reactions catalyst was separated
from reaction mixture by decantation, washed with ethyl acetate
and dried at room temperature. The recovered catalyst was
successively reused for next five cycles under same reaction
conditions. The results showed that the catalytic activity was
decreased after fourth cycle due to aggregation and leaching of
Pd NPs during recycling experiment (Fig. 3). The amount of Pd
lost after fourth cycle is 4% and 5% (0.0084 mg of and Pd 0.02
mg of Pd) for scheme 1 and scheme 2 respectively as determined
by ICP-AES. This clearly indicates that Pd/Nf-G has greater
stability and activity.
15 Zhang, P. P.; Zhang, X. X.; Sun, H. X.; Liu, R. H.; Wang, B.; Lin, Y. H.
Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50, 4455-4458.
16 Chen, W.; Li, P.; Wang, L. Tetrahedron, 2011, 67, 318-325.
17 Ma, Y. Y.; Ma, X. B.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, J. Q. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012,
2, 1879-1885.
18 Jin, M. J.; Taher, A.; Kang, H. J.; Choi, M.; Ryoo, R. Green Chem., 2009,
11, 309-313.
19 Awasthi, R.;. Singh, R. N. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 2011, 6, 4775-4786.
20 Shendage, S. S.; Patil, U. B. Nagarkar, J. M. Fuel Cells, 2013, 13, 364-
370.
21 Siamaki, A. R.; Khder, A. E. R. S.; Abdelsayed, V.; El-Shall, M. S.;
Gupton, B. F. J. Catal., 2011, 279, 1-11.
22 Heck, R. F. Acc. Chem. Res., 1979, 12, 146-151.
23 Shendage, S. S.; Patil, U. B.; Nagarkar, J. M. Tetrahedron Lett., 2013,
54, 3457–3461.
24 Li, Y.; Gao, W.; Ci, L.; Wang, C.; Ajayan, P. M. Carbon, 2010, 48, 1124-
1130.
25 Zhang, S.; Shao, Y.; Liao, H.; Engelhard, M. H.; Yin. G.; Lin, Y. ACS
Nano, 2011, 5, 1785-1791.
26 Yin, H.; Tang, H.; Wang, D.; Gao, Y.; Tang, Z. ACS Nano, 2012, 6,
8288-8297.
Fig. 3 The plot of GC yield (%) versus Run
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91-22-2163-1421/1423; fax: +91-22-2163-4262; e-mail: sureshsshendage@gmail.com