Inorganic Chemistry
EPR study has already been reported for chiral Cu -salen
Article
II
using the same concentration range as that in the pH-potentiometric
titrations. The CD spectra were registered with a Jasco J-810
spectropolarimeter using 1 mm and/or 1 cm cells in the 250−800 nm
wavelength range. Individual samples were prepared for the UV−vis
and CD experiments. IR spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer
Spectrum Two FTIR spectrometer in attenuated-total-reflectance
mode.
Continuous-Wave (CW)-EPR Measurements and Simulation
of the Spectra. All CW-EPR spectra were recorded with a Bruker
ElexSys E500 spectrometer (microwave frequency 9.45 GHz,
microwave power 13 mW, modulation amplitude 5 G, and
modulation frequency 100 kHz). Anisotropic EPR spectra were
recorded for aqueous solutions containing 5 mM copper(II) chloride
and 5 mM sulfosalan ligands. A NaOH solution was added to the
stock solution to adjust the pH of the samples. An 0.1 mL aliquot of
the sample solution was introduced into a quartz EPR tube, and then
1
5
II
complexes; however, Cu -sulfosalan complexes have not
been investigated before using simultaneous equilibrium and
EPR techniques. Below we report the equilibrium and
structural study of copper(II) complexes with several HSS-
type ligands, as shown in Scheme 1. Furthermore, the catalytic
activity of these complexes was also studied in aqueous media
in the Henry or nitroaldol reaction of aldehydes and
nitroalkanes, a synthetically important C−C bond-forming
1
6−20
process.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Materials and Methods. The CuCl stock solution was prepared
■
2
from the highest available grade, and its concentration was checked
gravimetrically and by the inductively coupled plasma method. The
concentration of the sulfosalan ligands were checked by pH
potentiometry. For solution equilibrium and spectroscopic studies,
doubly deionized and ultrafiltered (ELGA Purelab Classic system)
water was used.
0
.025 mL of methanol (MeOH) was added to avoid water
crystallization upon freezing. Frozen-solution EPR spectra were
measured in a Dewar container filled with liquid nitrogen at 77 K.
The measured spectra were corrected by the baseline spectrum
measured in the same way and simulated using a designated EPR
Synthesis of HSS-Type Ligands. The synthesis of the ligands
was performed according to the methods established in the literature.
HSS and BuHSS were prepared as described in ref 14, and cis-CyHSS,
26
program. To describe the isotropic spectra, the parameters g and
0
Cu
63,65
3
A0 of copper hyperfine ( Cu, I = / ) couplings were fitted and
2
N
14
10
two equivalent a
0
nitrogen ( N, I = 1) superhyperfine couplings
trans-CyHSS, and dPhHSS were obtained as described earlier. The
synthesis of PrHSS was carried out analogously to the preparation of
have been taken into account, with the parameters determined by
electron−electron double resonance (ELDOR)-detected NMR
(EDNMR) measurements. The relaxation parameters α, β, and γ
9
HSS; the details were reported in our previous paper. All ligands
1
13
were identified on the basis of their H and C NMR spectra, and
2
10
defined the line widths through the equation σMI = α + βM
I
+ γM
I
,
they were in excellent agreement with those reported earlier. The
purity of the ligands was also checked by pH-potentiometric titrations.
where M denotes the magnetic quantum number of the paramagnetic
I
II
metal ions. For the trans-CyHSS and dPhHSS spectra, the four lines
were fitted with separate line-width values (ω −ω ).
The anisotropic EPR spectra, recorded at 77 K, were also analyzed
with the EPR program. A rhombic g tensor (g , g , g ) and a rhombic
copper hyperfine A tensor (Ax , Ay , Az ) were fitted to simulate
the spectra. A rhombic nitrogen hyperfine tensor (a , a , a )
obtained by EDNMR was used in the simulation without fitting these
parameters. For a description of the line width, the orientation-
dependent α, β, and γ parameters were used to set up each
component spectrum. In order to check the correctness of the
evaluation, the solution spectra have been described also by using the
anisotropic EPR values and fitting the rotational correlation times.
Because natural copper(II) chloride was used for the measurements,
both the isotropic and anisotropic spectra were calculated as the sum
of the spectra of Cu and Cu weighted by their natural abundances.
The hyperfine and superhyperfine coupling constants and the
relaxation parameters were obtained in field units (Gauss = 10 T).
Pulsed-EPR Measurements. ESE-detected EPR and ELDOR
Synthesis and Isolation of the Cu -sulfosalan Complexes.
General Procedure. A total of 43.6 mg (0.24 mmol) of copper(II)
1
4
acetate [Cu(OAc) ] and 0.24 mmol of the appropriate sulfosalan
2
ligand (L) were dissolved in water (4 mL). The pH was adjusted to
x
y
z
Cu
Cu
Cu
7
.0−8.5 with concentrated sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and the
N
x
N
y
N
z
reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 14 h. Then the solution was
cooled to room temperature in ice water, and the Na [Cu(L)]
2
product was precipitated by the addition of 30 mL of ice-cold ethanol.
The solid was filtered, washed with absolute ethanol, and dried under
vacuum. The products were characterized by UV−vis and Fourier
transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopies and by the high-resolution
(
HR) electrospray ionization (ESI)-MS method. For details of the
synthesis of Na [Cu(HSS)] (1), Na [Cu(PrHSS)] (2), Na [Cu-
2
2
2
(
BuHSS)] (3), Na [Cu(cis-CyHSS)] (4), Na [Cu(trans-CyHSS)]
2
2
6
3
65
2
−
4
pH Potentiometry. The protonation constants (pK ) of the
a
sulfosalan ligands and the overall stability constants (log βpqr) of the
copper(II) complexes were determined by the pH-potentiometric
titration method using a carbonate free KOH solution (ca. 0.5 M).
The carbonate contamination was determined using the appropriate
(electron electron double resonance)-detected NMR (EDNMR)
27,28
measurements
were carried out with a W-band (95 GHz) Bruker
ELEXSYS E680 spectrometer in conjunction with a split-coil Oxford
T superconducting magnet equipped with an Oxford flow cryostat
21
6
Gran functions. Aliquots (10 mL) of the ligands (ca. 4 mM) were
titrated, the ionic strength of the samples was adjusted to 0.2 M KCl,
and the equilibrium measurements were carried out at 298 K. The
samples were stirred using a magnetic stirrer. During the titrations, the
headspace and sample were purged with argon in order to ensure the
absence of oxygen and carbon dioxide. The pH measurements were
made using a computer-controlled Metrohm 785 DMP Titrino
automatic titrator, and the instrument was equipped with a Metrohm
and a Bruker cylindrical cavity at 6 K. For the EDNMR
measurements, the pulse sequence was HTAmw2−T−π/
2mw1−τ−π −τ−echo, with the length of the high-turning angle
mw1
(
4
HTA) pulse 20 μs, t = 200 ns, and t = 400 ns. Delay times of T =
.4 μs and τ = 848 ns were applied. Spectra were recorded at 5−6
π/2 π
different observer positions, with 20−45 scans for each spectrum
depending on the echo intensity. The samples were prepared in water
using a 0.83 mM complex concentration, and glycerol was used to
avoid water crystallization. NaOH was added to the samples by
adjusting the pH (around pH 8.0).
6
.0262.100 combination glass electrode. The pH reading was
converted to hydrogen-ion concentration, as described by Irving et
al. The protonation constants (pK ) of the ligands and the overall
22
a
stability constants of the metal complexes, β
= [Cu L H ]/
The EDNMR and ESE-detected EPR spectra were simulated using
the EasySpin open-source MATLAB toolbox (version 5.2.28).
MS and NMR Spectroscopy. Time-of-flight (TOF)-ESI-MS
measurements were made with a Bruker maXis II MicroTOF-Q-type
Qq-TOF-MS instrument (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) both
in negative and positive modes. The instrument was equipped with an
electrospray ion source where the spray voltage was 4 kV. N was
utilized as a drying gas, and the drying temperature was 200 °C. The
spectra were accumulated and recorded using a digitalizer at a
pqr
p
q
r
29
p
q
r
[
Cu] [L] [H] , were calculated by using the dedicated computational
programs SUPERQUAD and PSEQUAD. The distribution curves
23
24
of the complexes formed between copper(II) and the ligands were
25
calculated by using the computational program MEDUSA.
UV−Vis, Circular Dichroism (CD), and FTIR Spectroscopic
Methods. UV−vis spectra of the copper(II) complexes were
recorded with an Agilent Technologies Cary 60 UV−vis xenon
pulse lamp spectrophotometer in the 250−800 nm wavelength range
2
1
1261
Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 11259−11272