2862 Yin et al.
Asian J. Chem.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
from Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Other
chemicals are also analytical grade.
NHK-9
1-Heptyl-3-methyl imidazole
H2SO4
Transesterification reaction procedure: All the experi-
ments were conducted in a 4-neck round bottom flask of volume
250 mL equipped with a stirrer, a thermometer, a condenser
pipe and a pressure-equalizing dropping funnel. The 4-neck
round bottom flask was dipped in a constant temperature water
bath which was equipped with a temperature sensor. 2-Ethyl-
hexanol and NKC-9 were put into the 4-neck round bottom
flask. The temperature in the reactor was maintained within
1 °C with respect to the desired temperature. The measured
quantities of 2-ethylhexanol and NKC-9 were charged into
the 4-neck round bottom flask and methyl acetate was charged
to the constant pressure drop funnel. Once the desired tempe-
rature was achieved, the methyl acetate was being dropped
into the reactive mixture over a 2 h period. After the dropping
was finished, the temperature is maintained at the desired
temperature for the fixed time. NKC-9 and the reactive liquid
were separated by vacuum filtration when it cooled down and
the NKC-9 was recycled at the same time. Finally the fraction
between 130 and 140 °C was collected by reduced pressure
distillation and weighed this fraction.
Gas chromatography was applied to study the components
of the reaction mixture. The conversions of 2-ethylhexanol and
the components of all samples were analyzed by gas chroma-
tography (GC7890F) equipped with hydrogen flame ionization
detector (FID). (N2 as carrier gas, a quartz capillary column
packed with PEG-20M 30 m × 0.53 mm × 0.5 µm, oven tempe-
rature 80 °C, injector temperature 220 °C, detector temperature
240 °C, injecting sample volume 0.2 µL; retention times:
methyl acetate 0.9 min, methanol 1.1 min, 2-ethylhexyl acetate
7 min, 2-ethylhexanol 12.5 min).
1
2
3
4
5
Time (h)
Fig. 1. Conversion of 2-ethylhexanol of the three different catalysts
(reaction temperature = 80 °C, methyl acetate/2-ethylhexanol = 3:1)
equipment corrosion and difficult to separate from the reaction
mixtures. Supported on the results above, the concentrated
sulfuric acid is not suitable for industrial production and the
catalytic activity of 1-heptyl-3 methyl imidazole acetate is
lower than others, thus, the strong-acid cationic exchange resin
NKC-9 proved to be the optimal catalyst in the transesterifi-
cation reaction of methyl acetate with 2-ethylhexanol.
Transesterification is a reversible reaction. The reactive
rate of reserve reaction changes with time. Fig. 1 also showed
that when the reaction time was 3 h, NKC-9 obtained the
highest conversion about 57 %. It was determined that 3 h
was chosen as the suitable reactive time.
Therefore, the catalyst used in the following experiments
in this paper was the strong-acid cationic exchange resin
NKC-9 and the reaction time was 3 h.
Product spectroscopic characterization: Infrared spectra
of the reaction product 2-ethylhexyl acetate (KBr pellets) was
recorded on Spectrum One-B (Perkin Elmer®) FT-IR spectro-
meter. 1H NMR spectra was measured in CHCl3-d1 using TMS
as internal standard with aVarian® INOVA spectrometer (400
MHz for 1H).
Optimization of reaction conditions
Effect of the reaction temperature: Temperature has a
significant effect on transesterification. To investigate the effect
of the reaction temperature, operations were carried out at 60,
70, 80, 90 and 100 °C. The initial molar ratio of methyl acetate
and 2-ethylhexanol was 3:1, reactive time was 3 h and the
catalyst loading was 20 wt. % (by mass of methyl acetate). As
shown in Fig. 2, at the beginning, with the increasing of tempe-
rature, the conversion of 2-ethylhexanol increased, because
the increase of temperature led to more successful collisions.
These successful collisions had sufficient energy (activation
energy) to break the bonds and form products and thus resulted
in higher convention of 2-ethylhexanol. However, when the
temperature reached 80 °C, the conversion of 2-ethylhexanol
was the highest point and then decreased with the increase of
temperature. Therefore, 80 °C was chosen as the most fixed
reaction temperature.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Catalyst and reaction time choices: Choice of catalyst
is important and results were obtained with different catalysts
for the transesterification.According to literature, the suitable
catalyst loading of concentrated sulfuric acid was chosen as
2 wt. % (by mass of methyl acetate)6, NKC-9 was 20 wt. %
(by mass of methyl acetate)4, 1-heptyl-3 methyl imidazole
acetate was 5 wt. % (by mass of methyl acetate)7.
The catalytic effect of the three different catalysts is
illustrated in Fig. 1. According to Fig. 1, it can be observed
that the catalytic effect: H2SO4 > NKC-9 > 1-heptyl-3 methyl
imidazole acetate. When acidic catalyst catalyzed, the reaction
mechanism of transesterification is that proton firstly combines
with the carbonyl of methyl acetate to form the intermediate
of carbocation. Then protophilic 2-ethylhexanol combines with
carbocation to form the intermediate. Finally this intermediate
is resolved to 2-ethylhexyl acetate and methanol. As H2SO4 is
stronger acidity than NKC-9, it showed better catalytic result
than NKC-9. But the concentrated sulfuric acid may cause
Effect of catalyst loading: The catalyst loading was
expressed as the weight ratio of the catalyst to the weight of
methyl acetate. The effect of catalyst loading on the conversion
of 2-ethylhexanol was tested varied from 0 to 20 wt % (by
mass of methyl acetate) at reaction temperature of 80 °C,
reactive time of 3 h and methyl acetate to 2-ethylhexanol molar