Reynhardt and Alper
Palladium catalysts are difficult to characterize due
in part to the fact that palladium is not NMR active.
Previous attempts to elucidate the mechanism of this
reaction have been hindered by this fact. However by
studying the accepted proposed mechanisms it is possible
and therefore, more than likely they resemble highly
branched polymers instead of dendrimers. This in turn
leads to a smaller amount of free amines available for
phosphonation. (3) Higher generations of dendrimers
grafted to the silica surface should be subject to crowding
at the periphery leading to further steric congestion and
possible back-folding, making fewer free amines available
to predict what possible resting states the catalyst would
form.6
,10,11,21
The greater part of this research was devoted
1
4
to the search for a pre-catalyst and reaction conditions,
under which a resting state that could be reactivated in
subsequent cycles is generated.
for phosphonation.
A solid-state 13C NMR method was developed to assess
the extent of growth of the dendrimers. The process is
quite straightforward and is derived from a method
developed by Mayoral18 for his phosphorus-containing
dendrimers. If the dendrimer grows perfectly, the ratio
of the integral of the aliphatic carbons to the integral of
the carbonyl carbon in the PAMAM backbone will be a
function of the generation, with the ratio declining over
the generations. As we cannot determine the absolute
value of the aliphatic carbons associated with the ami-
nopropyl silica gel alone (there is no carbonyl carbon in
the structure of aminopropyl silica gel), we have to correct
the theoretical value for G(1), with the experimental
values of G(1). The method indicates a trend for the
growth of the G(2)-G(4) dendrimers. The correction
factor was determined to be 13.6. This is most likely due
to the methyl capping of the aminopropylsilica gel. Data
for the higher generations was then calculated with this
value as a correction in the G(1) theoretical value.
To clarify the results further, we also calculated a 50%
growth column based on the assumption that only one
branch grows for each branching point (and not two as
in the perfect dendrimer). The results are reported in
Table 2.
P r ep a r a tion a n d Ch a r a cter iza tion of P a lla d iu m -
Com plexed P AMAM-SiO
ine (PAMAM) dendrimers, up to the fourth generation
Figure 1), on commercial aminopropyl silica gel (0.9
2
Den dr im er s. Polyamidoam-
(
mmol (0.1 amine groups/g), were prepared using litera-
ture methods (aminopropyl silica gel obtained from
1
Fluka). The dendrimers were phosphonated using diphen-
ylphosphine and paraformaldehyde by modification of
1
2
literature methods. The double phosphinomethylation
of the terminal amine groups of the dendrimers was
achieved by reacting the dendrimers with diphenylphos-
phinomethanol prepared in situ from diphenylphosphine
and paraformaldehyde in toluene (110 °C, 48 h). The
resulting phosphonated dendrimers were characterized
3
1
13
by solid-state P and C NMR; e.g., a chemical shift of
-
27 ppm in the 31P NMR spectrum compares well with
1
previously reported systems. The phosphonated den-
drimers were readily complexed on treatment with the
appropriate palladium complexes in toluene (rt, 1-2 h
under argon). The silica would turn deep orange to blood
red, and decolorization of the supernatant solvent was
used as an indication of the extent of complexation.
Due to the heterogeneous nature of the catalysts, usual
dendrimer characterization methods such as MS and
GPC could not be employed, but 13C and P NMR were
used to elucidate the structure, and palladium and
phosphorus ICP analysis was done to quantify the
amount of palladium and the extent of phosphonation of
the catalysts. A solid-state NMR internal standard
method (methyltriphenylphosphonium bromide as the
internal standard) for the rapid quantification of the
extent of phosphonation was also developed. The phos-
phorus NMR method was used as a quick estimation to
determine the amount of palladium required during the
complexation step, and the ICP analyses (carried out
externally) was done to improve the level of accuracy
As the growth of the dendrimers was not complete,
another characterization method was required to verify
the ICP and NMR results.
To quantitatively determine the degree of growth of
the dendrimer, a function D, defined as follows, is
proposed:
31
D ) M(d)/M (d)
t
where D is the degree of growth of the dendrimer, M(d)
is the mass of the dendrimer per gram, and M (d) is the
t
theoretical mass of the dendrimer per gram.
To assess D, a thermal gravimetric analyses (TGA)
study was undertaken. The results are summarized in
Table 3.
(Table 1).
It is clear from Table 1 that the extent of phosphona-
As can be seen in Table 3, the degree of growth of the
dendrimers is about 0.3-0.6 for the different generations.
Therefore, about 30% growth is detected for the higher
generations of the dendrimers. This is in accordance with
tion differed from the theoretical expectations, and
several reasons for this are plausible: (1) Some of the
amino groups on the aminopropyl silica gel used for the
synthesis of the dendrimers might reside in the pores of
the support and would therefore lead to ineffective
growth of the dendrimers due to steric hindrance and
would then result in ineffective phosphonation. (2) It is
statistically probable that the growth of the dendrimers
(14) (a) Nayler, A. M.; Goddard, W. A., III; Kiefer, G. E.; Tomalia,
D. A.; J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2339-2342. (b) J ansen, J . F. G.
A.; de Brabander-van den Berg, E. M. M.; Meijer, E. W. Science 1994,
2
66, 1226-1229.
(15) Amatore, C.; J utand, A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 178-180,
511-528.
(
whether inside the pores or outside) is not complete,13
(16) Newkome, G. R.; Moorefield, C. N.; Vogtle, F. Dendrimers and
Dendrons; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001.
(
10) Kawana, M.; Nakamura, S.; Watanabe, E.; Urata, H. J .
Organomet. Chem. 1997, 542, 185-189.
11) Scivanti, A.; Beghetto, V.; Campagna, E.; Zanato, M.; Mateoli,
U.; Organometallics 1998, 17, 630-635.
12) Reetz, M. T.; Lohmer, G.; Schwikkardi, R. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1526-1529.
13) Tsubokawa, N.; Ichioka, H.; Satoh, T.; Hayashi, S.; Fujiki, K.;
React. Funct. Polym. 1998, 37, 75-82.
(17) Reman, W. G.; De Boer, G. B. J .; Van Langen, S. A. J .;
Nahuijsen, A.; Eur. Patent no. EU 0411721A2, 1990.
(18) (a) Slaney, M.; Bardaji, M.; Casanove, M.; Caminade, A.;
Majoral J .; Chaudret, B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9764-9765. (b)
Bardaji, M. Kustos, M.; Caminade, A.; Majoral, J .; Chaudret, B.
Organometallics 1997, 16, 403-410. (c) Slaney, M.; Bardaji, M.;
Caminade, A.; Majoral J .; Chaudret, B. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 1939-
1945.
(
(
(
8
354 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 22, 2003