7
94
A. Pirisedigh et al.
Table 4 Comparison of aryldiazonium silica sulfate (3) in reaction of styrene or methyl acrylate at RT with other aryldiazonium salts (1, 2)
?
2
Ar-N
Ar
Olefin
Catalyst/mol%
Solvent
Time/min
Yield/%
a
1
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
a
[48]
4-Me-Ph
4-Me-Ph
Ph
Styrene
1
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
BmimPF
BmimPF
EtOH
EtOH
THF
840
60
93
97
38
87
85
76
82
88
91
75
91
85
90
Styrene
2.5
10
5
75
255
240
30
[20]
[20]
Styrene
2-Me-Ph
Ph
Styrene
Styrene
2.5
2.5
2
2-Me-Ph
Ph
Styrene
80
[49]
[49]
Methyl acrylate
Methyl acrylate
Methyl acrylate
Methyl acrylate
Styrene
6
6
180
180
10
4-Br-Ph
Ph
2
2.5
2.5
2
4-Br-Ph
2-Me-Ph
4-Br-Ph
2-Me-Ph
4-Br-Ph
15
[50]
[50]
300
240
80
Styrene
2
THF
Styrene
2.5
2.5
EtOH
EtOH
Styrene
90
At 70 °C
after vigorous stirring. The residue was washed with
3
EtOAc (3 9 10 cm ) and the combined organic layer was
References
3
washed with 20 cm H O and then dried over anhydrous
1
2
3
. Heck RF, Nolley JP (1972) J Org Chem 37:2320
. Mizoroki T, Mori K, Ozaki A (1971) Bull Chem Soc Jpn 44:581
. Djakovitch L, Wagner M, Hartung CG, Beller M, Koehler K
2
CaCl . The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure
2
1
13
to provide the pure product. The H NMR and C NMR
spectra of known compounds were identical to those in the
literature [20, 40, 48–50, 52, 53].
(
2004) J Mol Catal A 219:121
4. Choudary BM, Madhi S, Chowdari NS, Kantam ML, Sreedhar B
2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:14127
(
5
. Fabrizi G, Goggiamani A, Sferrazza A, Cacchi S (2010) Angew
Chem Int Ed 49:4067
Methyl trans-3-(2-benzoylphenyl)propenoate
4f, C H O )
17 14 3
6
7
. Kim SJ, Oh SD, Lee S, Choi SH (2008) J Ind Eng Chem 14:449
. Felpin FX, Nassar-Hardy L, Callonnec FL, Fouquet E (2011)
Tetrahedron 67:2815
(
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ): d = 7.80-7.82 (m, Ph,
3
–
CH=CH–CO–, 3H), 7.74-7.77 (m, Ph, 1H), 7.59-7.63
d, Ph, 1H), 7.53-7.56 (m, Ph, 1H), 7.44-7.49 (m, Ph,
H), 6.39 (d, J = 16 Hz, 1H, –CH=CH–CO–), 3.74 (s,
8. Gaudin JM (1991) Tetrahedron Lett 32:6113
9. Overman LE, Ricca DJ, Tran VD (1993) J Am Chem Soc
(
1
15:2042
4
1
1
0. Tietze LF, Buhr W (1995) Angew Chem Int Ed 34:1366
1. Ren G, Cui X, Yang E, Yang F, Wu Y (2010) Tetrahedron
66:4022
1
3
OCH , 3H) ppm; C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ): d = 197.1
3
3
(
–CO–Ph), 166.8 (–CO–OMe), 142.0 (–CH=CH–CO–),
1
1
1
39.4, 137.3, 134.7, 134.6, 134.2, 133.9, 133.6, 131.0,
30.8, 130.4, 130.1, 129.2, 129.1, 128.6, 128.1, 127.3 (Ph),
12. de Vries JG (2001) Can J Chem 79:1086
1
1
1
3. Shinkai I, King AO, Larsen RD (1994) Pure Appl Chem 66:1551
4. Priego J, Carretero JC (1999) Synlett 1603:1603–1605
5. Darses S, Pucheault M, Genet JP (2001) Eur J Org Chem 1121
20.5 (–CH=CH–CO–), 51.7 (OCH ) ppm; IR (KBr):
3
ꢀ
m = 3,051 (=C–H), 2,952 (C–H), 1,726 (C=O), 1,587
16. Carpes MJS, Correia CRD (2002) Tetrahedron Lett 43:741
17. Andrus MB, Song C, Zhang J (2002) Org Lett 4:2079
-
1
?
(
C=C) cm ; HRMS (ESI): calcd for (C H O ?H)
17 14 3
1
1
2
2
8. Roglans A, Pla-Quintana A, Moreno-Manas M (2006) Chem Rev
06:4622
9. Felpin FX, Miqueu K, Sotiropoulos JM, Fouquet E, Ibarguren O,
Laudien J (2010) Chem Eur J 16:5191
0. Masllorens J, Maas MM, Quintana AP, Roglans A (2003) Org
Lett 5:1559
1. Dai M, Liang B, Wang C, Chen J, Yang Z (2004) Org Lett 6:221
2
67.0938, found 267.0941.
1
Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge the funding support
received for this project from the Islamic Azad University, Kazerun
Branch, Iran. Further financial support from the Islamic Azad Uni-
versity, Fasa, and Khorasgan Branches, Iran, is gratefully
acknowledged.
1
23