K. Matoba et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 574 (1999) 3–10
9
3h, 3m, 3n, 3q and 3r, which are commercial products.
3-Phenylpropanal (3a): 91% yield; an oil; H-NMR
containing the above prepared Ph2SbCl and the flask
was deaerated and then filled with oxygen. A syringe
filled with 50 ml of oxygen was connected to the flask in
which the reaction was carried out by adding solution
of allyl alcohol (1a) (58.1 mg, 1 mmol) in acetonitrile
(10 ml) under stirring. After 2 h, the 18 ml of oxygen in
the syringe was consumed, which corresponds to 0.74
mmol (25°C, 1 atm) and the oxygen consumption did
not increase any more. The GLC yield of 3-phenyl-
propanal (3a) was 72% (0.72 mmol).
1
l=2.78 (2H, td, J=7.7, 1.4 Hz), 2.97 (2H, t, J=7.7
Hz), 7.18–7.30 (5H, m) and 9.83 (1H, t, J=1.4 Hz).
2-Methyl-3-phenylpropanal (3c): 67% yield; an oil;
1H-NMR l=1.09 (3H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 2.60 (1H, dd,
J=12.6, 7.8 Hz), 2.68 (1H, m), 3.09 (1H, dd, J=12.6,
5.0 Hz), 7.16–7.33 (5H, m) and 9.72 (1H, d, J=1.4
Hz).
1
3-Methyl-3-phenylbutanal (3e): 12% yield; an oil; H-
NMR l=1.45 (6H, s), 2.66 (2H, d, J=3.0 Hz), 7.20–
7.39 (5H, m) and 9.49 (1H, t, J=3.0 Hz).
3-Phenylcyclohexanone (3g): 11% yield; an oil; H-
4.2.4. Attempts to characterize the precipitates formed
after the reaction
1
NMR l=1.74–1.92 (2H, m), 2.07–2.19 (2H, m), 2.32–
2.62 (4H, m), 2.96–3.04 (1H, m) and 7.21–7.37 (5H,
m).
The IR spectrum of the dried precipitates showed the
band at 457 cm−1, which can probably be assigned to
SbꢀO [19], as well as the bands corresponding to mono-
substituted phenyl group. The combustion analysis
showed H% 1.85, C% 24.72 and O% 11.80 and these
values were lower than those expected from PhSbO2
(H% 2.18, C% 31.22, O% 13.86). In the mass spectrum
analysis (FAB) the value of 365 was observed as a
parent peak and also the fragment peaks clearly showed
the presence of antimony considered from their ratio of
isotopes. Further, EPMA analysis of another lot
showed the presence of both antimony and chlorine
and the ICP analysis of Sb and the ion chromatography
analysis of Cl revealed them to be 63.8% and 8.96%,
respectively, the ratio of which being 2:1. The XRD
analysis showed that the precipitates were amorphous
and not crystalline inorganic compounds such as SbCl3
and Sb2O3.
(E)-3-Acetoxy-1-phenyl-1-butene (3i): 63% yield; an
1
oil; H-NMR l=1.41 (3H, d, J=6.6 Hz), 2.08 (3H, s),
5.53 (1H, dq, J=6.9, 6.6 Hz), 6.19 (1H, dd, J=16.0,
6.9 Hz), 6.60 (1H, d, J=16.0 Hz) and 7.24–7.40 (5H,
m).
(E)-Cinnamyl phenyl ether (3l1) and (E,Z)-phenyl-3-
phenyl-1-propenyl ether (3l2): 3l2 was isolated as an
E/Z mixture; 3l1 (a white solid as a pure form) was
1
identified by the H-NMR spectrum of a mixture of 3l1
and 3l2. 3l1: 1H-NMR l=4.71 (2H, d, J=5.9 Hz), 6.43
(1H, dt, J=16.1, 5.9 Hz), 6.74 (1H, d, J=16.1 Hz) and
6.94–6.99, 7.25–7.44 (10H, m). (E)-3l2: an oil; 1H-
4
NMR l=3.38 (2H, dd, J=7.5Hz and J=1.4 Hz),
5.54 (1H, dt, J=12.1, 7.5 Hz), 6.51 (1H, dt, J=12.1
4
Hz and J=1.4 Hz) and 6.97–7.09, 7.16–7.46 (10H,
1
m). (Z)-3l2: an oil; H-NMR l=3.58 (2H, dd, J=7.6
Hz and 4J=1.4 Hz), 5.04 (1H, td, J=7.6, 6.0 Hz), 6.50
4
(1H, dt, J=6.0 Hz and J=1.4 Hz) and 6.97–7.09,
Acknowledgements
7.16–7.46 (10H, m).
(E)-1,3-Diphenyl-1-propene (3p): an oil; 1H-NMR
l=3.55 (2H, d, J=6.2 Hz), 6.37 (1H, dt, J=15.9, 6.2
Hz), 6.47 (1H, d, J=15.9 Hz) and 7.21–7.37 (10H, m).
The authors would like to thank Dr Naoya Shige-
moto of Shikoku Research Institute Incorporated for
analysis of the precipitates by EPMA, ICP, ion chro-
matography and XRD.
4.2.2. The procedure for NMR spectroscopic study
In an NMR tube Pd(OAc)2 (1.89 mg, 8.4 mmol) was
placed under N2. The in situ prepared Ph2SbCl (10.6
mg, 34 mmol) was dissolved in degassed CDCl3 (0.5 ml),
and the mixture was deaerated by suction under cooling
with liquid nitrogen. The deaerated solution was then
added to Pd(OAc)2 in the NMR tube under N2, and the
1H-NMR analysis was carried out.
References
[1] For recent reviews see: (a) L.D. Freedman, G.O. Doak, in: F.R.
Hartley (Ed.), The Chemistry of the Metal–Carbon Bond, vol. 5,
Wiley, New York, 1989, pp. 397–413. (b) Y.Z. Huang, Acc.
Chem. Res. 25 (1992) 182. (c) L.D. Freedman, G.O. Doak, J.
Organomet. Chem. 477 (1994) 1; J. Organomet. Chem. 486
(1995) 1; J. Organomet. Chem. 496 (1995) 137.
[2] (a) C.S. Cho, K. Tanabe, S. Uemura, Tetrahedron Lett. 35
(1994) 1275. (b) C.S. Cho, S. Motofusa, K. Ohe, S. Uemura,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 69 (1996) 2341.
[3] (a) R.F. Heck, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90 (1968) 5518. (b) R.F. Heck,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91 (1969) 6707. (c) J.B. Melpolder, R.F.
Heck, J. Org. Chem. 41 (1976) 265. (d) A.J. Chalk, S.A. Magen-
nis, J. Org. Chem. 41 (1976) 273. (e) R.F. Heck, Org. React. 27
(1982) 345. (f) J. Tsuji, Palladium Reagents and Catalysts, Wiley,
New York, 1995, p. 127.
4.2.3. The procedure for measurement of oxygen
consumption
Diphenylantimony chloride (1.2 mmol) was prepared
in situ by stirring triphenylstibine (282.5 mg, 0.8 mmol)
and antimony(III) chloride (91.2 mg, 0.4 mmol) in the
absence of solvent for 5 h at 25°C [10]. Then, the
internal standard dibenzyl (50.0 mg) and palladium(II)
acetate (6.9 mg, 0.03 mmol) were added to the flask