ChemComm
Communication
as [(QꢀÀ)CoII,HS(QꢀÀ)]. Despite the apparent similarity of this
complex with several reported cobalt complexes, unique cata-
lytic reactivities have been observed with it. Quantification of
the catalytic results and a possible mechanistic picture has
been presented. It is the subtle cooperative interplay between
cobalt and the redox-active ligands that make such catalytic
bond formation possible. The results presented here display
the catalytic utility of redox-active metal complexes in C–C bond
formation reactions, and provide impetus for carrying out
studies with a systematic variation of the ligand backbone.
Such investigations are likely to shed more light on the catalytic
activity of such metal complexes.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, SA 1580/5-1, SL
104/2-1) is kindly acknowledged for financial support of this
project. We thank Prof. Dr M. Dressel for access to the SQUID
¨
facilities of the 1. Physikalisches Institut, Universitat Stuttgart.
Scheme 1 Proposed catalytic cycle for the (electro)catalytic C–C bond
formation reaction with 1.
Notes and references
1 (a) M. D. Ward and J. A. McCleverty, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2002,
275; (b) C. G. Pierpont, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2001, 216–217, 95;
(c) P. Chaudhuri, C. N. Verani, E. Bill, E. Bothe, T. Weyhermu¨ller
and K. Wieghardt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 2213.
substrate for this reaction. The trends observed are similar to
the reaction with benzyl bromide (Fig. S10–S12, ESI†). However,
reaction rates with benzyl chloride are slower. For example, at a
scan rate of 100 mV sÀ1, the value of kobs for the reaction with
benzyl chloride is about 2.8 sÀ1. This observation is consistent
with the breaking of the C–halide bond as the possible rate
determining step. Control reactions were also performed with
Bu4NBr to rule out the involvement of species derived from BrÀ
in catalysis. Such a reaction did not display any catalytic current
(Fig. S9 and S13, ESI†).
2 For selected examples see: (a) B. de Bruin, D. G. H. Hetterscheid,
A. J. J. Koekkoek and H.-J. Gru¨tzmacher, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 2007,
55, 247; (b) P. J. Chirik and K. Wieghardt, Science, 2010, 327, 794;
(c) V. K. K. Praneeth, M. R. Ringenberg and T. R. Ward, Angew. Chem.,
2012, 124, 10374; (d) M. K. Tsai, J. Rochford, D. E. Polyansky,
T. Wada, K. Tanaka and J. T. Muckerman, Inorg. Chem., 2009,
48, 4372; (e) Forum Issue on Redox-Active Ligands, Inorg. Chem.,
2011, 50, 9737–9914; ( f ) Cluster Issue, Cooperative and Redox Non-
Innocent Ligands in Directing Organometallic Reactivity, Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem., 2012, 340–580; (g) V. Lyaskovskyy and B. de Bruin,
ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 270.
We then turned our attention to the possible mechanism of
this (electro)catalytic reaction. A mixture of in situ generated
[Co(Q2À)2]2À and benzyl chloride were stirred together, and a
ESI mass spectrum of the mixture was recorded. The main
product observed from this mixture was the five-fold coordinated
cobalt complex [Co(QꢀÀ)2(CH2Ph)]À (Fig. S15, ESI†). Additionally,
a chromatographic work-up of the reaction mixture, and 1H NMR
characterization of the organic phase delivered dibenzyl as the
exclusive product (Fig. S16, ESI†). Control experiments showed
that CoCl2 without the ligand does not deliver any product
(Fig. S17, ESI†). Taking these observations into consideration, a
mechanism shown in Scheme 1 can be postulated. The complex
12À activates the C–X bonds of the substrates which lead to a
release of XÀ and the formation of the aforementioned five-fold
coordinated species. The formation of the C–C coupled dibenzyl
product leads to a release of 1À, the reduction of which regene-
rates the active catalyst 12À. This cycle ensures that the 1/1À redox
couple of complex 1 remains unchanged during the catalytic
cycle, as has been experimentally observed (Fig. 3).
3 For selected examples see: (a) A. I. Poddel’sky, V. K. Cherkasov and
G. A. Abakumov, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2009, 253, 291; (b) Z. Sun,
H. Chun, K. Hildebrandt, E. Boethe, T. Weyhermu¨ller, F. Neese and
K. Wieghardt, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 4295; (c) P. Ghosh, A. Begum,
D. Herebian, E. Boethe, K. Hildebrand, T. Weyhermu¨ller and
K. Wieghardt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 563;
(d) M. R. Ringenberg, S. L. Kokatam, Z. M. Heiden and
T. B. Rauchfuss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 788; (e) D. Das,
H. Agarwala, A. Dutta Chowdhury, T. Patra, S. M. Mobin, B. Sarkar,
W. Kaim and G. K. Lahiri, Chem. – Eur. J., 2013, 19, 7384.
4 (a) M. M. Khusniyarov, K. Harms, O. Burghaus, J. Sundermeyer,
B. Sarkar, W. Kaim, J. van Slageren, C. Duboc and J. Fiedler, Dalton
Trans., 2008, 1355; (b) A. L. Balch and R. H. Holm, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1966, 88, 5201; (c) D. Herebian, K. Wieghardt and F. Neese, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 10997; (d) E. Bill, E. Bothe, P. Chaudhuri,
K. Chlopek, D. Herebian, S. Kokatam, K. Ray, T. Weyhermu¨ller,
F. Neese and K. Wieghardt, Chem.
– Eur. J., 2005, 11, 204;
(e) K. Chlopek, E. Bothe, F. Nesse, T. Weyhermu¨ller and
K. Wieghardt, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 6298.
5 (a) A. L. Smith, K. I. Hardcastle and J. D. Soper, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2010, 132, 14358; (b) W. I. Dzik, J. I. van der Vlugt, J. N. H. Reek and
B. de Bruin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 3356.
6 (a) N. Deibel, D. Schweinfurth, S. Hohloch, J. Fiedler and B. Sarkar,
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 2388; (b) N. Deibel, D. Schweinfurth,
S. Hohloch, M. Delor, I. V. Sazanovich, M. Towrie, J. Weinstein and
B. Sarkar, Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53, 1021; (c) S. Hohloch, P. Braunstein
and B. Sarkar, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2012, 546.
7 S. Bhattacharya, P. Gupta, F. Basuli and C. G. Pierpont, Inorg. Chem.,
2002, 41, 5810.
Summarizing, we have presented here a four-coordinate
cobalt complex with a redox-active ligand. The geometric and
electronic structure of this complex has been probed by a
variety of methods, and the complex 1 can be best described
11106 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 11104--11106
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014