7
2
Letters in Organic Chemistry, 2015, Vol. 12, No. 1
Vivek Srivastava
PHI 1600 spectrometer). The palladium contents of the sam-
ples were determined quantitatively by atomic absorption
spectroscopy (AAS) on a HITACHI Z-2300 instrument.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Declared none.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
3
.1. General Procedure for Heck Reaction
Supplementary material is available on the publishers
Web site along with the published article.
Add 50 mL round bottom flask with aryl halide (0.5
mmol), vinyl compound (1.5 mmol), catalyst in a solvent
system as per reported quantity in Table 1, Entry 1-25. Base
(
1.5 mmol) and phosphine ligand (0.05 mmol) were added as
REFERENCES
per requirement (Table 1, Entry 1-25). The resulting reaction
mass was allowed to heat at the 100 C for 1 hour. After cool-
ing the reaction mass the volatile materials were under re-
duced pressure at 40 C for 20 minutes. Then the reaction
product was isolated with diethyl ether (5x2mL) washing.
Then the purification of reaction product was carried out
with flash chromatography (eluent: AcOEt: n-hexane=1: 3)
to achieve the pure Heck reaction product.
o
[1]
Huang, C.; Li, C.; Shi, G. Enery Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8848.
Li, Y.; Fan, X.; Qi, J.; Ji, j.; Wang, S.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, F. Nano
Res. 2010, 3, 429.
[2]
o
[3]
Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D. A.; Dommett, G. H. B.; Kohlhaas, K. M.;
Zimney, E. J.; Stach, E. A.; Piner, R. D.; Nguyen, S. T.; Ruoff, R.
S. Nature 2006, 442, 282.
[4]
[5]
[6]
Mayer, J. C.; Geim, A. K.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Novoselov, T. J.;
Booth, T. J.; Roth, S. Nature 2007, 60, 446.
Ponomarenko, L. A.; Schedin, F.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Yang, R.; Hill,
E. W.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K. Science 2008, 356. 320.
Novoselov, K. S.; Jiang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Morozov, S. V.; Stormer, H.
L.; Zeitler, U.; Maan, J. C.; Boebinger, G. S.; Kim, P. ; Geim, A. K.
Science 2007, 315, 1379.
3
.2. Catalyst Recycling Experiment
Add 50 mL round bottom flask with with aryl halide (0.5
[
[8]
7]
Garg, B.; Ling, Y. C. Green Materials 2012, 1, 47.
Pumera, M. Langmuir 2007, 23, 6453.
mmol), vinyl compound (1.5 mmol), Pd/rGO (0.25 mole %)
in [bmim]NTf (2 mL) with K CO (1.5 mol). The resulting
reaction mass was allowed to heat at 100 C for 1 hour. The
reaction mass was allowed to cool at room temperature (20-
2
reaction mass under reduced pressure at 40 C for 20 minutes.
The reaction product was isolated after washing with diethyl
ether (5x2mL) and the catalytic system was dried under re-
duced pressure at 50°C for 30 minutes. Then the next slot of
reactants was added for the next recycling run.
[9]
Seechurn, D. C. C. J.; Kitching, M. O.; Colacot, T. J.; Snieckus, V.
Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5062.
2
2
3
o
[
[
10]
11]
Hooper, M. Platinum Metals Rev. 2005, 49, 77.
Nicolaou, K. C.; Bulger, P. G.; Sarlah, D. Angew Chem. Int. Ed.
o
5 C). Then the volatile materials were evaporated from the
2
005, 44, 4442.
o
[12]
Miyaura, N.; Sujuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1996, 95, 2457.
[13]
[14]
[15]
Blaser, H. U.; Indolese, A.; Schnyder, A.; Steiner, H.; Studer, M.
Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 2001, 3, 173.
Scheuermann, G. M.; Rumi, L.; Steurer, L.; Bannwarth, W.;
Mulhupt, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8262.
Tang, Z.; Shen, S.; Zhuang, J.; Wang, X. Angew Chem. Int. Ed.
2
010, 49, 4603.
[
[
[
16]
17]
18]
Singh, G. ; Kumar, A. Indian Journal of Chemistry 2008, 47A, 495.
Srivastava, V. Journal of Chemistry 2013, 2013, 1.
Tan, Y.; Xu, C.; Chen, G.; Zheng, N.; Xie, Q. Energy Environ. Sci.
2012, 5, 6923.
CONCLUSION
We have successfully developed a highly efficient ligand
free method for Heck reaction. Ionic liquid mediated Pd/rGO
catalyst in an ionic liquid medium which afforded the cou-
pling products with excellent yield. One of the major advan-
tages of the proposed protocol is that the catalyst system can
be easily re-used without loss of catalytic activity, thereby
multiplying catalyst turnover. Another advantage is that the
reaction proceeds without phosphine ligands, which are ex-
pensive, toxic and contaminants of product. The Green na-
ture of ionic liquid and its operational simplicity makes the
present Heck reactions more attractive.
[
19]
20]
Chen, M.; Zhang, Z.; Li, L.; Liu, F.; Wangb, W.; Gao, J. RSC Adv.,
2
014, 4, 30914.
[
Cassol, C.C.; Umpierre, A.P.; Machado, G.; Wolke, S.I.; Dupont, J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3298.
Bellina, F.; Chiappe, C. Molecules 2010, 15, 2211.
Kumar, S.; Mukri, B. D.; Patil, S.; Madras, G.; Hegde, M. S. J.
Chem. Sci. 2011, 123, 47.
[21]
[
22]
[
23]
Martins, S. M. A.; Brancob, P. C. S.; Pereira, A. M. D. R. L. J.
Braz. Chem. Soc. 2012, 23, 688.
[
[
24]
25]
Irimescu, R.; Kato, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 523.
Hagiwara, H.; Shimizu, Y.; Hoshi, T.; Suzuki, T.; Okhubo, M. K.,
Yokoyama, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4349.
Kumar, S. S. R.; Murki, B. D.; Patil, S.; Madras, G.; Hegde, M. S.
J. Chem. Sci. 2011, 123, 47.
Pan, C.; Liu, M.; Zhang, L.; Wu, H.; Ding, J.; Cheng, J. Cat. Com-
mun. 2008, 9, 321.
Shem, L.; Huang, S.; Nie, Y. Lei, Y. Molecule 2013, 18, 1602.
[26]
[27]
[
28]
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors confirm that this article content has no con-
flict of interest.