Graphite oxide as an efficient solid reagent for esterification reactions

Article abstract of DOI:10.3906/kim-1401-81

Esterification of organic acids with alcohols under mild conditions in high yields using graphite oxide, a readily available and inexpensive material, as an effective reagent is described.

Full text of DOI:10.3906/kim-1401-81

Turk J Chem
2014) 38: 859 – 864
Turkish Journal of Chemistry
(
http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/chem/
¨
˙
⃝
c TUBITAK
Research Article
doi:10.3906/kim-1401-81
Graphite oxide as an efficient solid reagent for esterification reactions
1
,∗
2
1
Maryam MIRZA-AGHAYAN , Rabah BOUKHERROUB , Mahshid RAHIMIFARD
1
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Research Center of Iran (CCERCI), Tehran, Iran
Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Lille 1 University, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
2
Received: 29.01.2014
•
Accepted: 14.04.2014
•
Published Online: 15.08.2014
•
Printed: 12.09.2014
Abstract:Esterification of organic acids with alcohols under mild conditions in high yields using graphite oxide, a readily
available and inexpensive material, as an effective reagent is described.
Key words: Acids, alcohols, esterification, graphite oxide, solid reagent
1
. Introduction
Esters are a class of compounds widely distributed in nature. Esters encompass a large family of organic
compounds with broad applications in medicine, biology, chemistry, and industry as plasticizers, solvents,
perfumes, and flavor chemicals and also as precursors for a gamut of pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and other
fine chemicals.1
Esterification of alcohols by carboxylic acids using homogeneous acid catalysts is very well known.2
However, the use of homogeneous acid catalysts for esterification like sulfuric acid and p-toluenesulphonic acid
suffers from several drawbacks such as the occurrence of side reactions, corrosion of the equipment, and the
need to deal with acidic wastes.3 The use of solid catalysts for chemical transformations has received increasing
attention,4,5 and has the advantages of being easy to recover and reuse, as well as being compatible with
environmental considerations.6
−10
Several authors have reported the utilization of solid acid porous materials such as zeolites,1
1−14
meso-
porous materials,15,16 ion-exchange resins,17 and HO3 S-functionalized porous carbon18,19 for different reac-
tions. For example, Amberlyst 15 is known as a catalyst with good properties in terms of its esterification
efficiency.20 Heteropoly acids (HPAs) supported on acid activated bentonite matrix (AT-GMB) act as stable
solid acid catalysts for esterification of acetic acid with n-, sec-, and tert-butanol to produce their corresponding
esters.21 More recently, Minakawa and co-workers have reported on the direct dehydrative esterification of alco-
hols and carboxylic acids with a macroporous polymeric acid catalyst at 50–80 C after 12 h.22 Although most
of the solid acid catalysts offer distinct advantages over conventional methods in terms of product separation
and recycling, they suffer from certain drawbacks such as high cost, long reaction times, poor selectivity, and
lower yields of the desired products.
◦
Graphite oxide (GO) has attracted much interest as a possible route for the large-scale production
and manipulation of graphene,23 a material with outstanding properties. GO and graphene oxide, pre-
pared by exhaustive oxidation of graphite, have been explored as heterogeneous catalysts for various organic
∗
Correspondence: m.mirzaaghayan@ccerci.ac.ir
8
59

MIRZA-AGHAYAN et al./Turk J Chem
transformations.2
4−31
In spite of many successful examples of using GO or graphene oxide as a catalyst support
4−39
to the best of our knowledge there is still no report of using GO as an efficient solid acid
in recent years,2
catalyst.
2
. Results and discussion
We previously reported that GO could be applied as an efficient oxidizing agent for the oxidative aromatization
of Hantzsch derivatives.40 More recently, we have shown the high performance of GO for oxidation of various
alcohols into their corresponding aldehyde or ketone compounds under ultrasonic irradiation.41 In continuation
of our investigation, herein we discuss the potential use of GO as a highly efficient reagent for the esterification
of different carboxylic acids with various alcohols under mild conditions (Scheme).
Scheme. Esterification reaction of different carboxylic acids with various alcohols.
The GO utilized in this work was prepared according to a modified Hummers’ method.4
1−44
The
synthesized GO was characterized using UV/Vis spectroscopy, powder XRD, and FT-IR spectroscopy.24,41
At an earlier stage of our work, the reaction of acetic acid (5 mmol), hexanol (5 mmol), and GO under
different experimental conditions was examined with the aim to obtain the maximum yield of product. The
results are presented in Table 1.
As indicated in Table 1, when the esterification of acetic acid with 1-hexanol was performed in absence
◦
of GO, the reaction was very slow and gave only 6% of the corresponding ester after 2 h at 90 C (Entry 1,
Table 1). It should be noted that hexyl acetate was obtained in only 25% yield when the reaction of acetic acid,
◦
1
-hexanol, and 5 mg of GO was carried out at 50 C (Entry 2, Table 1). Increasing the amount of GO to 50
◦
mg and the temperature to 90 C led to a significant increase in the yield of the corresponding ester to 93%
(
Entry 3, Table 1). However, it seems that 5 mg of GO was sufficient for this reaction as hexyl acetate was
◦
obtained in 81% yield after 2 h at 90 C (Entry 4, Table 1).
In a similar fashion, various acids such as acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid reacted smoothly
with primary and secondary aliphatic alcohols (1-hexanol, 1-pentanol, 1-decanol, 1-butanol, 2-pentanol, and
◦
cyclohexanol) or benzyl alcohol in the presence of GO at 90 C to afford the corresponding ester derivatives
(
Table 1). Under these experimental conditions, the reaction of 5 mmol of acetic acid with 5 mmol of 1-
pentanol in the presence of 5 mg of GO gave pentyl acetate in 80% yield (Entry 5, Table 1). Similarly, the
reaction of acetic acid with 1-decanol or benzyl alcohol afforded decyl or benzyl acetate in 85% and 80% yield,
respectively (Entries 6 and 7, Table 1). High yields were also obtained for the esterification of propionic acid
with 1-hexanol or 1-butanol: 80% and 92% yield, respectively (Entries 8 and 9, Table 1). In a similar fashion,
hexyl butyrate, butyl butyrate, and benzyl butyrate were synthesized in 80% yield under otherwise similar
experimental conditions (Entries 10-12, Table 1). In the case of secondary alcohols such as 2-pentanol, the
yield of esterification was low when the reaction was performed under conditions similar to those for primary
alcohols. An increase in the GO amount (from 5 mg to 10 mg) was required to achieve good yields (Entries
1
1
3 and 14, Table 1). Similar behavior was observed for secondary cyclic alcohols such as cyclohexanol (Entries
5–19, Table 1). 2-Pentyl acetate, cyclohexyl propionate, and cyclohexyl butyrate were obtained in 73%, 81%,
860

MIRZA-AGHAYAN et al./Turk J Chem
Table 1. Esterification of various acids with different alcohols in the presence of GO as solid reagent.
Entry Acid
Alcohol
Time Temperature GO
Yielda
◦
(
h)
( C)
90
50
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
(mg) (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
acetic acid
1-hexanol
2
—
5
6
acetic acid
1-hexanol
1-hexanol
2
25
93
81
80
85
80
80
92
80
80
80
43
73
35
50
81
50
75
-
acetic acid
2
50
5
acetic acid
1-hexanol
1-pentanol
1-decanol
2
acetic acid
2
5
acetic acid
2
5
acetic acid
benzyl alcohol
1-hexanol
2
5
propionic acid
propionic acid
butyric acid
butyric acid
butyric acid
acetic acid
2
5
1-butanol
1-hexanol
2
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
3
5
1-butanol
3
5
benzyl alcohol
2-pentanol
2-pentanol
cyclohexanol
cyclohexanol
cyclohexanol
cyclohexanol
cyclohexanol
1-hexanol
2
5
3
5
acetic acid
3
10
5
propionic acid
propionic acid
propionic acid
butyric acid
butyric acid
benzoic acid
benzoic acid
benzoic acid
benzoic acid
benzoic acid
2
3
5
6
10
5
3
6
10
—-
—-
10
10
10
10
10
3
1-hexanol
24
3
6
1-hexanol
37
73
70
89
86
1-hexanol
24
24
24
24
1-pentanol
4-nitrobenzoic acid 1-hexanolb
4-nitrobenzoic acid 1-pentanolb
(
a)The products in these reactions were analyzed by gas chromatography (Varian CP-3800) with a flame ionization
detector (FID), and n-hexane was used as an internal standard. (b) For 5 mmol of acid 10 mmol of alcohol was used.
and 75% yield using 10 mg of GO as reagent after 3 h, 6 h, and 6 h, respectively (Entries 14, 17, and 19,
Table 1).
Finally, we investigated the esterification reaction of aromatic acids such as benzoic and 4-nitrobenzoic
acid with 1-hexanol or 1-pentanol. When the esterification of benzoic acid with 1-hexanol was performed in the
◦
absence of GO, the reaction was very slow and gave only 6% of the corresponding ester after 24 h at 90
C
(
Entries 20 and 21, Table 1). Addition of 10 mg of GO to the reaction mixture led to the successful formation
of hexyl benzoate in 73% yield after 24 h (Entry 23, Table 1). Similarly, the reaction of benzoic acid with 1-
pentanol, and 4-nitrobenzoic acid with 1-hexanol or 1-heptanol gave the corresponding esters: pentyl benzoate,
hexyl 4-nitrobenzoate, and pentyl 4-nitrobenzoate in 70%, 89%, and 86% yield after 24 h, respectively (Entries
24–26, Table 1). However, it should be noted that the esterification of aromatic acids needed a long reaction
time and the yields were moderate.
Next, we examined the reusability of the GO for the esterification of acetic acid with 1-hexanol. After
completion of the reaction, GO was removed by filtration. The GO was dried and reutilized for 3 consecutive
8
61

MIRZA-AGHAYAN et al./Turk J Chem
esterification reactions. The results in Table 2 indicate a loss of activity of the recycled GO after each reaction.
Hexyl acetate was obtained in 81%, 39%, and 14% yield after the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd run, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2. Reusability of GO for the esterification of acetic acid with 1-hexanol.
a
Entry Yield (%) Time (h) Run
1
2
3
81
39
14
2
2
2
First
Second
Third
a
◦
Determined by GC. Reaction conditions: acetic acid (5 mmol), 1-hexanol (5 mmol), and GO (5 mg) at 90 C.
3
. Conclusion
The esterification reaction in the presence of a solid acid, GO, in a solvent-free system proved to be highly
efficient on the investigated substrates. The esterification of aliphatic and aromatic acids with aliphatic and
aromatic alcohols afforded the corresponding esters in the presence of GO. This method has several advantages
as the reaction occurs in solvent-free conditions, and takes place in short reaction times and mild conditions.
The yield was good for esterification of aliphatic acids with primary alcohol compounds. However, an increase
in the amount of GO for secondary acyclic and cyclic alcohols was required to obtain comparable yields. The
esterification of aromatic acids required a long reaction time and the yields were moderate. Furthermore, GO
is a cost effective material that may be easily removed from the reaction mixture by simple filtration.
4
4
. Experimental
.1. General remarks
All compounds were obtained from Merck and used without further purification. GC/MS analysis was performed
on a FISON GC 8000 series TRIO 1000 gas chromatograph equipped with a capillary column CP Sil.5 CB, 60 m
×
0.25 mm ID. 1 H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 80 spectrometer using TMS as internal standard.
4
.2. Preparation of GO
Eight grams of graphite was added to a mixture of 14 mL of sulfuric acid (98%), 4 g of potassium persulfate,
◦
and 4 g of phosphorus pentoxide with stirring. The mixture was kept at 80 C for 6 h. The resulting product
was washed with water and dried. CAUTION: 8 g of preoxidized product was added to 180 mL of sulfuric acid
(
98%), followed by the slow addition of 24 g of potassium permanganate with the temperature maintained below
◦
◦
20
C in order to avoid overheating and explosion. The temperature was increased to 35 C and maintained
for 2 h. Next 400 mL of water was added over 15 min. A further 1.1 L of water was added to dilute the
solution, and 20 mL of hydrogen peroxide (30%) was added to the solution to quench the excess potassium
permanganate. A brown solution was obtained and was washed with a 2-L solution of 1:10 hydrogen chloride
(
37%):water in order to remove metal ions and finally washed with 2 L of water. Dried GO was obtained by
centrifugation followed by dehydration on a rotary evaporator under vacuum.4
1−44
4
.3. Typical procedure for esterification
To a solution of acid (5 mmol) and alcohol (5 mmol) was added GO (5 mg). The resulting mixture was stirred
◦
at 90 C for the indicated time in Table 1 prior to GC analysis. The mixture was filtered and purified with
862

MIRZA-AGHAYAN et al./Turk J Chem
fractional distillation. The spectroscopic data of the obtained esters were compared with those of authentic
5−48
samples.4
References
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Zaidi, A.; Gainer, J. L.; Carta, G. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1995, 48, 601–605.
Patai, S. (Ed.), The Chemistry of Carboxylic Acid and Esters. Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1969.
Vogel, A. I.; Furniss, B. S. Vogel’s Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry. Longman: London, UK, 1989.
Kantam, M. L.; Bhaskar, V.; Choudary, B. M. Catal. Lett. 2002, 78, 185–188.
Liu, W.-T.; Tan, C.-S. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 3281–3286.
Collignon, F.; Loenders, R.; Martens, J. A.; Jacobs, P. A.; Poncelet, G. J. Catal. 1999, 182, 302–312.
Kim, H.-J.; Kang, B.-S.; Kim, M.-J.; Kim, D.-K.; Lee, J.-S.; Lee, K.-Y. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2004, 153, 201–204.
Kim, H.-J.; Kang, B.-S.; Kim, M.-J.; Park, Y. M.; Kim, D.-K.; Lee, J.-S.; Lee, K.-Y. Catal. Today 2004, 93–95,
3
15–320.
9
.
Marchetti, J. M.; Miguel, V. U.; Errazu, A. F. Fuel 2007, 86, 906–910.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0. Park, Y.-M.; Lee, D.-W.; Kim, D.-K.; Lee, J.-S.; Lee, K.-Y. Catal. Today 2008, 131, 238–243.
1. Corma, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 559–614.
2. Davis, M. E. Nature 2002, 417, 813–821.
3. Liu, F.; Meng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, L.; Nawaz, F.; Xiao, F.-S. J. Catal. 2010, 271, 52–58.
4. Jones, C. W.; Tsuji, K.; Davis, M. E. Nature 1998, 393, 52–54.
5. Melero, J. A.; van Grieken, R.; Morales, G. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3790–3812.
6. De Vos, D. E.; Dams, M.; Sels, B. F.; Jacobs, P. A. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3615–3640.
7. Barbaro, P.; Liguori, F. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 515–529.
8. Hara, M.; Yoshida, T.; Takagaki, A.; Takata, T.; Kondo, J. N.; Hayashi, S.; Domen, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2
004, 43, 2955–2958.
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
9. Toda, M.; Takagaki, A.; Okamura, M.; Kondo, J. N.; Hayashi, S.; Domen, K.; Hara, M. Nature 2005, 438, 178–178.
0. Park, J.-Y.; Kim, D.-K.; Lee, J.-S. Bioresource Technol. 2010, 101, S62–S65.
1. Bhorodwaj, S. K.; Dutta, D. K. Appl. Clay Sci. 2011, 53, 347–352.
2. Minakawa, M.; Baek, H.; Yamada, Y. M. A.; Wook Han, J.; Uozumi, Y. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 5798–5801.
3. Choi, W.; Lee, J.-W. Graphene: Synthesis and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011.
4. Vijay Kumar, A.; Rama Rao, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 5188–5191.
5. Dreyer, D. R.; Jia, H.-P.; Bielawski, C. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6813–6816.
6. Dreyer, D. R.; Bielawski, C. W. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1233–1240.
7. Jia, H.-P.; Dreyer, D. R.; Bielawski, C. W. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 4431–4434.
8. Jia, H.-P.; Dreyer, D. R.; Bielawski, C. W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 528–532.
9. Dreyer, D. R.; Jia, H.-P.; Todd, A. D.; Geng, J.; Bielawski, C. W. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 7292–7295.
0. Dreyer, D. R.; Jarvis, K. A.; Ferreira, P. J.; Bielawski, C. W. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 757–766.
1. Dreyer, D. R.; Jarvis, K. A.; Ferreira, P. J.; Bielawski, C. W. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 7659–7667.
2. Xiong, Z.; Zhang, L. L.; Zhao, X. S. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 2428–2434.
3. Zhang, H.; Lv, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, J. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 380–386.
4. Severin, N.; Kirstein, S.; Sokolov, I. M.; Rabe, J. P. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 457–461.
8
63

MIRZA-AGHAYAN et al./Turk J Chem
3
3
3
3
3
5. Ide, Y.; Nakasato, Y.; Ogawa, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3601–3604.
6. Zhou, Y.-G.; Chen, J.-J.; Wang, F.-B.; Sheng, Z.-H.; Xia, X.-H. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 5951–5953.
7. Sutter, P. W.; Flege, J.-I.; Sutter, E. A. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 406–411.
8. Tang, Z.; Shen, S.; Zhuang, J.; Wang, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4603–4607.
9. Scheuermann, G. M.; Rumi, L.; Steurer, P.; Bannwarth, W.; M u¨ lhaupt, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8262–
8
270.
4
4
4
0. Mirza-Aghayan, M.; Boukherroub, R.; Nemati, M.; Rahimifard, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 2473–2475.
1. Mirza-Aghayan, M.; Kashef-Azar, E.; Boukherroub, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 4962–4965.
2. Zhou, X.; Huang, X.; Qi, X.; Wu, S.; Xue, C.; Boey, F. Y. C.; Yan, Q.; Chen, P.; Zhang, H. J. Phys. Chem. C
2
009, 113, 10842–10846.
4
4
3. Wang, Z.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, J.; Boey, F.; Zhang, H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 14071–14075.
4. Kovtyukhova, N. I.; Ollivier, P. J.; Martin, B. R.; Mallouk, T. E.; Chizhik, S. A.; Buzaneva, E. V.; Gorchinskiy,
A. D. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 771–778.
1
3
1
4
5. Pouchert, C. J.; Behnke, J. The Aldrich Library of
C and H FT NMR Spectra; Vol. 1–3; Aldrich Chemical
Company: Milwaukee, WI, USA, 1993.
4
4
6. Gowrisankar, S.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5139–5143.
7. Won, J.-E.; Kim, H.-K.; Kim, J.-J.; Yim, H.-S.; Kim, M.-J.; Kang, S.-B.; Chung, H.-A.; Leeb, S.-G.; Yoon, Y.-J.
Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 12720–12730.
4
8. Xue-Shun, J.; Hai-Long, W.; Qing, H.; Ling-Long, K.; Wei-He, Z. J. Chem. Res. 2006, 2, 135–138.
864

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Chemistry is the property of Scientific and Technical
Research Council of Turkey and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or
posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users
may print, download, or email articles for individual use.