W.-W. Zhang et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 78 (2012) 65–71
67
with a UV detector at 254 nm. Methanol containing 30% (v/v) water
was used as the mobile phase and at a split flow rate of 0.8 mL/min.
Ester identification and quantification were done by comparing the
retention time and peak area of the sample with standard. Pure
phenylethyl acetate was used as external standard.
1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker DMX
400. Spectra were run in CDCl3 and referenced to an internal TMS
standard.
Scheme 1. Transesterification of 2-phenylethanol and vinyl acetate.
tion between amphiphilic molecules and enzyme molecules at the
interface could play an important role on the enzyme activity [21].
Surfactants behave as the interface between the organic phase and
the enzyme harboring buffer providing first level of protection to
the enzyme entrapped within the micelle [23]. So the influence
of the different kinds of surfactants used for gelatin MBGs prepa-
ration was investigated by immobilizing lipase from C. rugosa in
CTAB (cationic), AOT (anionic) and Triton X-100 (nonionic) based
microemulsion organogels, respectively. All the three surfactants
formed thermostable reverse micellar solutions with the solvents.
From Fig. 1, AOT based MBGs gave the highest yield with 98.4%
transesterification after 24 h in comparison to CTAB or Triton X-
100 based MBGs. CTAB based MBGs performed the lowest activity,
which may be due to the strong interaction between the cationic
head group in the surfactant molecule and the negatively charged
structure of lipase which may result in reduced activity [34]. Com-
pared with cationic surfactants, moderate interactions between
lipase and nonionic surfactant are responsible for better catalytic
activity than cationic surfactants. But different observations were
made by Dandavate and Madamwar [31]. In their study, it was
found that lipase immobilized in Triton X-100 based organogels
exhibited comparatively lower esterification activity than lipase
immobilized in CTAB-based organogels. They speculated that it
might be owing to the poor stability of Triton X-100 organogels.
However in our study we obtained stable Triton X-100 organogels
with different Wo and Po value which may perform better transes-
terification activity. Thus AOT based MBGs were further exploited
at various conditions.
2.9. Characterization of products
Phenylethyl acetate (1): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm):
7.32–7.21 (m, 5H), 4.28 (t, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 2.94 (t, 2H, J = 6.0 Hz), 2.03
(s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm): 170.96, 137.87, 128.92,
128.54, 126.60, 64.95, 35.13, 20.93. ESI-MS: 165.1 [M+H]+.
2-Phenylpropyl acetate (2): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm):
7.33–7.21 (m, 5H), 4.21–4.10 (m, 2H), 3.09 (q, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 2.01
(s, 3H), 1.30 (d, 3H, J = 8.0 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm):
170.96, 143.22, 128.52, 127.30, 126.71, 69.39, 38.95, 20.86, 18.10.
ESI-MS: 179.1 [M+H]+.
Benzyl acetate (3): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm): 7.37–7.34
(m, 5H), 5.11 (s, 2H), 2.10 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ı,
ppm): 170.94, 135.96, 128.59, 128.29, 66.34, 21.02. ESI-MS: 151.1
[M+H]+.
4-Bromobenzyl acetate (4): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm):
7.50–7.22 (m, 4H), 5.05 (s, 2H), 2.10 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3, ı, ppm): 170.65, 135.02, 131.68, 129.91, 122.23, 65.43, 20.92.
ESI-MS: 251.0 [M+Na]+.
3-Methylbenzyl acetate (5): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm):
7.27–7.13 (m, 4H), 5.07 (s, 2H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 2.10 (s, 3H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm): 171.02, 138.28, 135.88, 129.06, 125.40,
66.43, 21.37, 21.01. ESI-MS: 187.1 [M+Na]+.
1-Phenylethyl acetate (6): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm):
7.36–7.29 (m, 5H), 5.88 (q, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 2.07 (s, 3H), 1.53 (d,
3H, J = 4.0 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm): 170.31, 141.73,
128.53, 127.89, 126.12, 72.33, 22.23, 21.34. ESI-MS: 165.1 [M+H]+.
4-Nitrobenzyl acetate (7): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm):
8.23 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.52 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.21 (s, 2H), 2.16 (s,
3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm): 170.50, 147.63, 143.30,
128.35, 123.73, 64.73, 20.78. ESI-MS: 218.0 [M+Na]+.
Theeffectoftheconcentrationof enzymeusedduringtheimmo-
bilization step was studied and the result was shown in Fig. 2. We
investigated different lipase concentration of MBGs on transesteri-
fication. From Fig. 2, it was observed that the transesterification rate
decreased markedly as the amount of lipase used in immobiliza-
tion processes increased. Excessive lipase concentration resulted in
Cyclohexyl acetate (8): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm):
4.74–4.72 (m, 1H), 2.03 (s, 3H), 1.86–1.67 (m, 4H), 1.42–1.26 (m,
6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm): 170.46, 72.58, 31.60, 25.33,
23.75, 21.33. ESI-MS: 143.1 [M+H]+.
Octyl acetate (9): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm): 4.05 (t,
2H, J = 6.0 Hz), 2.05 (s, 3H), 1.64–1.59 (m, 2H), 1.36–1.26 (m, 10H),
0.88 (t, 3H, J = 6.0 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm): 171.11,
64.58, 31.74, 29.18, 29.14, 28.57, 22.59, 20.90, 14.00. ESI-MS: 173.2
[M+H]+.
Decyl acetate (10): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm): 4.05 (t,
2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 2.05 (s, 3H), 1.83–1.58 (m, 2H), 1.31–1.27 (m, 14H),
0.88 (t, 3H, J = 8.0 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ı, ppm): 171.09,
64.58, 31.85, 29.49, 29.26, 29.22, 28.58, 25.88, 22.63, 20.89, 14.02.
ESI-MS: 201.2 [M+H]+.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis of arylethyl acetate catalyzed by CRL immobilized
The CRL immobilized in MBGs using different surfactants were
applied and the activities of these biocatalysts were evaluated
in the transesterification of 2-phenylethanol with vinyl acetate
(Scheme 1).
Fig. 1. Effect of different surfactants based reverse micelles. (a) Transesterification
was carried out at 37 ◦C and 150 rpm for 24 h in vinyl acetate. 2-Phenylethanol
concentration was 10 mg/mL.