M. H. Serrano-Wu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 8593–8595
8595
strategy should be applicable to other bifunctional
Acknowledgements
molecules containing nucleophilic heteroatoms or possi-
bly stabilized carbanions. Moreover, the recent demon-
stration of the 2-trimethylsilyl ethyl group as a versatile
linker for solid phase synthesis suggests an interesting
application of our novel deprotection methodology to
The authors would like to thank Professor Jim
Leighton (Columbia University) for helpful discussions.
6
immobilized ester substrates.
References
Several mechanistic possibilities may be proposed for
the deprotection of TMSE esters by NaH in DMF. We
favor a mechanism whereby NaH reacts with adventi-
tious moisture in the solvent, and that NaOH is in fact
1
. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999;
pp. 399–400.
7
2. General experimental procedure: To a solution of the
TMSE ester (1.0 mmol) in 4 mL DMF (Aldrich) was
added NaH (40 mg, 1.0 mmol of a 60% dispersion in
mineral oil) in one portion as a solid. The heterogeneous
mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. Upon
disappearance of starting material, the reaction was parti-
tioned between 1 N HCl and ether. The organic layer was
washed with water and brine, and then dried over MgSO4
prior to filtration and evaporation. The crude product
was purified by trituration with hexanes or flash chro-
matography.
the active species. In fact, a number of bases (KO-t-
Bu, KOTMS, KOEt) were identified as competent
8
hydroxide precursors. ‘Anhydrous’ hydroxide is
known to cleave simple (i.e. methyl and ethyl) esters by
attack at the carbonyl and subsequent acylꢀoxygen
9
,10
bond fissure,
and certainly this mechanism may
operate in the hydrolysis of unhindered esters such as
a. With sterically-demanding substrates, however, a
2
different reaction pathway involving hydroxide attack
at silicon may prevail. Subjecting ethyl mesitoate to the
standard reaction conditions affords no hydrolysis
product, whereas the corresponding TMSE ester 2b
undergoes clean deprotection at room temperature.
Moreover, an aliquot from the deprotection reaction of
3
. After 24 h at room temperature, the reaction of 2a in
THF proceeded to 31% conversion; in CH CN, 50%
3
conversion. Both reactions were contaminated with
unidentified by-products.
. Bender, M. L.; Dewey, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78,
2
a revealed the generation of hexamethyldisiloxane
4
5
(
detected by GC/MS), which provides additional evi-
317–319.
dence for anhydrous hydroxide attacking silicon in a
similar fashion to fluoride. The observed stability of a
SEM ether to the reaction conditions (ester 2e) suggests
that the collapse of the putative silicate intermediate is
facilitated by expulsion of a good carboxylate leaving
group for the ester, while no such leaving group is
available for the SEM ether.
. The corresponding TES ether of 2d was quantitatively
deprotected under the reaction conditions to afford 4-
hydroxymethyl benzoic acid. Meanwhile, the TBS ether
of 2d gave a mixture of mono- and bis-deprotected
material.
6. Wang, B.; Chen, L.; Kim, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
1463–1466.
7
. When the reaction is performed in the presence of 4 A
molecular sieves, the reaction proceeds to only 18% con-
version after 24 h.
,
In summary, we have discovered a novel method for
the deprotection of TMSE esters that offers an attrac-
tive alternative to existing methodology. In addition to
greater functional group tolerance, this mild method
generates volatile by-products that are easily removed
to afford analytically pure material. The incorporation
of this protocol into a tandem alkylation/deprotection
strategy contributes to the potential increased utility of
the TMSE ester protecting group in organic synthesis.
8. However, when aqueous 1 N NaOH was used with DMF
as solvent, incomplete conversion (53%) of 2a was
observed after 48 h.
9. Roberts, W.; Whiting, M. C. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 1290–
1293.
10. Gassman, P. G.; Schenk, W. N. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42,
918–920.